This blog post is the first in a forthcoming series on the 2018 Farm Bill.
As Congress begins the complex task of crafting the next Farm Bill, much is at stake – from conservation to "food stamps" to rural economies. This blog post is the first in a series addressing important policy considerations with an eye toward making the Farm Bill more effective, rather than backsliding on these and other important issues.
President Obama once referred to the current (2014) Farm Bill as a "Swiss Army knife" because of the many areas of American life that it touches. Another way to think of the omnibus legislation, passed roughly every four to five years, is as a food security bill.
Food security is a helpful framework to foster improved policy coherence in the next Farm Bill across a breadth of policy areas. A food-secure Farm Bill is one that provides for effective conservation on agricultural working lands, strong rural economies, and healthy food access for all Americans. In order to attain food security, the various titles of the Farm Bill need to work together, but in reality, fundamental inconsistencies exist among the legislation's titles.
For example, the Farm Bill's crop insurance "safety net" title, as implemented, rewards poor stewardship while the law's conservation title tries to address environmental harms caused by that agricultural production. The conservation title does this by authorizing and funding voluntary programs that provide billions of dollars to farmers to install conservation practices with the goals of improving environmental outcomes on agricultural land and reducing water pollution, soil erosion, and greenhouse gas emissions.
In addition to being undermined by crop insurance policy, we don't have a comprehensive understanding of how well the conservation title's best practices work. In fact, soil erosion, water pollution, and other problems persist.
Congress needs to make critical improvements in the 2018 version of the Farm Bill if it is to achieve a more food-secure America and a better value for taxpayers. It can begin with a down payment on a more effective conservation title embodied in a recently introduced bill, the Healthy Fields and Farm Economies Act.
The thrust of the Healthy Fields and Farm Economies Act is simple: to authorize and fund the measurement, evaluation, and reporting of conservation program outcomes. This baseline data is necessary for the government to assess how well conservation practices work and under what circumstances, a prerequisite to improving the effectiveness of conservation programs. In the past, conservation practice data and research has been stymied by privacy concerns voiced by industry groups, leading to privacy requirements that far exceed those applied to most Americans. The Healthy Fields and Farm Economies Act addresses this concern by providing reasonable privacy safeguards in addition to a robust mechanism for bona fide public research.
Incorporating the policies set forth in the Healthy Fields and Farm Economies Act into the next Farm Bill is a foundational step to a truly effective conservation title, one that is better designed to address agricultural pollution, conserve our precious natural resources to ensure future production, and provide a better value for the public's investment.
Showing 2,834 results
Laurie Ristino | January 17, 2018
This blog post is the first in a forthcoming series on the 2018 Farm Bill. As Congress begins the complex task of crafting the next Farm Bill, much is at stake – from conservation to “food stamps” to rural economies. This blog post is the first in a series addressing important policy considerations with an […]
Alejandro Camacho | January 11, 2018
Professor Michael Robinson-Dorn of the University of California, Irvine co-authored this article with Center for Progressive Reform Member Scholar and University of California, Irvine Professor Alejandro Camacho. It originally appeared in The Conversation on January 11, 2018. Since the Endangered Species Act became law in 1973, the U.S. government has played a critical role in […]
James Goodwin | January 9, 2018
On January 8, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) struck a resounding blow against the Trump administration’s ill-advised agenda to put its thumb on the scale of the energy market by propping up the coal industry, unanimously rejecting a controversial proposal by Department of Energy (DOE) Secretary Rick Perry. Perry’s plan would have resulted in […]
Matthew Freeman | December 28, 2017
CPR’s Member Scholars and staff rounded out a prolific year of op-ed writing with pieces covering several topics, touching on the Endangered Species Act, the scuttling of criminal justice reform, saving the Chesapeake Bay, the Administration’s efforts to unravel the Clean Power Plan, and the tax bill President Trump signed into law last week. You […]
Daniel Farber | December 27, 2017
The Obama Administration’s Clean Power Plan would require utilities to improve efficiency at coal-fired power plants and reduce the use of those plants in favor of generators using natural gas or renewables. Head of EPA Scott Pruitt claims EPA can only require CO2 cuts that can be accomplished by utilities “inside the fenceline” of a […]
Matthew Freeman | December 21, 2017
“Despite the most extensive bipartisan support in many years for the reform of mass incarceration in the United States, the Trump administration has ignored this enormous problem and focuses solely on greater leniency for white collar criminals.” So writes CPR’s Rena Steinzor in her latest op-ed in The Hill. She goes on to describe the circumstances […]
Katie Tracy | December 20, 2017
President Trump planned and then starred in his own ribbon-cutting ceremony last week, symbolic of all the safeguards for health, safety and the environment that he intends to shred while in office. This mockery of the administration’s obligation to ensure the public is protected from harm caused by corner-cutting businesses coincided with the release of […]
Matthew Freeman | December 19, 2017
“You don’t grasp the beauty of the destruction of words. Do you know that Newspeak is the only language in the world whose vocabulary gets smaller every year?” Winston Smith, 1984 Donald Trump has never been known for the breadth of his vocabulary. In his case, I’ve always assumed that was a marker of a […]
Carl Cranor | December 18, 2017
Is the current “tax reform” going through Congress just? Justice is important because even if citizens are treated dissimilarly by institutions, if the differences are just, all have reasonable treatment and the institutions are likely to be socially accepted. A widely endorsed theory of justice, developed by the philosopher John Rawls nearly 50 years ago, […]