The Hill Op-Ed: Brett Kavanaugh's Opportunistic Corner Cutting

Rena Steinzor

Aug. 30, 2018

This op-ed originally ran in The Hill.

Tens of thousands of thoughtful — and not so thoughtful — words have been written about Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh’s substantive positions on issues the court will face. At least one question has not been addressed, however: Is Judge Brett Kavanaugh so ideological about certain topics that he veers toward sloppiness?

As a law professor, I spend a lot of time around first-year law students, introducing them to the professional standards that define a good lawyer. My advice includes three things they must never do: ignore inconvenient language in a law to distort its meaning; rocket off on tangents that have little to do with the subject at hand; and cite one law to support a conclusion in another area to which it does not apply.

Kavanaugh has done all three things in D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals opinions of significance and his colleagues have rightly called him out for this professionally dubious behavior. The three examples have to do with administrative law, his specialty, and an area where he will try to lead the Supreme Court if confirmed.

Read the full op-ed in The Hill.

Read More by Rena Steinzor
Posted in:
CPR HOMEPAGE
More on CPR's Work & Scholars.
July 13, 2020

The Peril of Ethylene Oxide: Replacing One Public Health Crisis with Another

July 2, 2020

Will COVID-19 'Shock' Workplace Injury Law Like the Railroads of the Early 20th Century?

July 1, 2020

California Keeps on Truckin'

June 19, 2020

The Supreme Court's DACA Decision, Environmental Rollbacks, and the Regulatory Rule of Law

June 19, 2020

Supreme Court Affirms Title VII Protections for LGBTQ+ Community

June 18, 2020

D.C. Circuit Restricts 'Housekeeping' Regulations

June 18, 2020

The Climate Crisis and Heat Stress: Maryland Farms Must Adapt to Rising Temperatures