Join us.

We’re working to create a just society and preserve a healthy environment for future generations. Donate today to help.

Donate

Wind on the Water: Five Benefits of Offshore Wind Energy

A few years ago, the prospects of offshore wind energy seemed lofty, but the industry is finally taking off. As part of his efforts to combat climate change, President Joe Biden has pledged to double offshore wind production by 2030. This commitment stems from the enormous benefits and potential that wind energy can provide as we transition to clean, sustainable energy. 

Harnessing something as intangible as wind may seem like an unlikely source of energy, but it’s downright powerful, thanks to the design and capacity of offshore wind farms. A single rotation of General Electric’s most powerful turbine, Haliade-X, can power a household in the United Kingdom for two days. Results may differ slightly in the United States because the average U.S. household uses about three times more electricity than the average U.K. household. 

Last month, the Biden administration approved the Vineyard Wind project, the first large-scale wind farm in the United States — located 15 miles off the coast of Martha’s Vineyard in Massachusetts, it will use 62 Haliade-X turbines to power 400,000 homes and generate 3,600 jobs.

The project is massive compared to two other U.S. projects — one with five turbines off the coast of Rhode Island and another with two turbines off the coast of Virginia.  Together, they produce 42 megawatts of electricity per year. Put into context: the Block Island project — alone —  produces about 30 megawatts of offshore wind, and has the capacity to power 20,000 homes.

Here’s a look at five benefits of offshore wind:

Jobs. Offshore wind power creates jobs. Biden administration officials estimate that offshore wind farms could generate 44,000 new jobs in the sector alone — through construction jobs — as well as 33,000 new jobs in other sectors, including manufacturing, installation, and operations and maintenance (O&M). According to a recent report by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management at the U.S. Department of the Interior, O&M jobs are considered permanent, highly skilled jobs because annual and ongoing operations are needed to sustain the life of the installation.

Tourism. Offshore wind farms attract tourists, according to a 2019 study from the University of Rhode Island. The Block Island Wind Farm off the coast of Rhode Island saw a 19 percent increase in AirBnB leases since it was built in 2016. Tourists see the wind turbines by boat, with some touring the site by the Block Island Ferry.

Opponents say massive wind farms impair visual enjoyment of the natural environment. In fact, offshore wind farms are located far from the coastline; as such, they are less visible from land and don't require hundreds of miles of transmission lines, which are a true eyesore. With the noted increase in visiting tourists, it’s clear that when turbines are visible, they bring revenue to the region.

Fishers also benefit. Anglers near Block Island noticed target species crowd around the turbines because their steel bases create “support structures,” encrusted with mussels and crustaceans, that attract scup, mahi-mahi, and striped bass.

Public Health. Wind energy is clean; it doesn’t pollute the air like coal, gas, oil and other fossil fuels. The leading driver of climate change, fossil fuels emit nitrous oxide, sulfur dioxide, and carbon dioxide — all of which damage public health. Wind energy, on the other hand, can help the United States transition away from fossil fuel emissions  and improve not only our environment but also our health.

Sustainability. Unlike fossil fuels, which take millions of years to form, wind energy is inexhaustible. Offshore wind power differs from its onshore counterpart in two ways. First, offshore wind speeds are steadier and faster and, as a result, generate more, and more reliable and efficient, energy. Second, offshore wind turbines are unimpeded by physical restrictions, whereas onshore turbines can be blocked by buildings or other structures in the natural environment. 

Resilience. Unlike traditional building structures, wind turbines are adaptable to hurricanes; they have a built-in mechanism that locks and protects the blades when wind speeds exceed 55 miles per hour. When storms subside, the blades resume providing electricity to the grid. They are reliable in all seasons. 

Winter, in fact, is the most productive season for offshore wind power because that’s when winds are strongest (because air density increases with falling temperatures). Freezing weather isn’t a problem either, thanks to de-icing and ice-proofing strategies. As our world moves toward clean and renewable sources of energy, and as the wind market grows, significant improvements in wind technology are expected.

Of course, change brings skepticism. But offshore wind farms are crucial as we transition toward a clean energy future that creates jobs, improves public health, and protects our environment. 

Showing 2,817 results

Alina Gonzalez | June 15, 2021

Wind on the Water: Five Benefits of Offshore Wind Energy

Not long ago, the prospects of offshore wind energy seemed lofty, but the industry is finally taking off. As part of his efforts to combat climate change, President Biden has pledged to double offshore wind production by 2030. This commitment stems from the enormous benefits and potential that wind energy can provide as we transition to clean, sustainable energy.

James Goodwin | June 10, 2021

Department of Labor’s Emergency Temporary Standard Too Weak to Protect All Workers from COVID-19

The Labor Department’s emergency COVID standard, released June 10, is too limited and weak to effectively protect all workers from the ongoing pandemic. Workers justifiably expected an enforceable general industry standard to protect them from COVID-19, and the Center for Progressive Reform (CPR) has been calling for such a standard since June 2020. But what emerged after more than six weeks of closed-door White House review was a largely unenforceable voluntary guidance document, with only health care workers receiving the benefit of an enforceable standard.

James Goodwin | June 9, 2021

CPR Scholars and Staff Back EPA’s Plan to Eliminate Trump ‘Benefits-Busting’ Rule

In addition to cleaning up our environment, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) must also clean up the mess the Trump administration left behind. The Biden EPA recently took an important step in this direction by finalizing its plan to rescind a Trump-era rule that would drastically overhaul how it analyzes the rules it develops to implement the Clean Air Act. If implemented, Trump's "benefits-busting" rule would have sabotaged the effective and timely implementation of this popular and essential law, which protects the public from dangerous pollution that worsens asthma and causes other diseases. On June 9, the EPA held a public hearing to gather feedback on rescinding the rule. CPR Member Scholars Rebecca Bratspies and Amy Sinden joined me in testifying in support.

Daniel Farber | June 9, 2021

What Have We Learned from Recent Disasters?

Hurricanes Harvey and Maria. California wildfires. Superstorm Sandy. The great Texas blackout. The list goes on. These mega-events dramatize the need to improve our disaster response system. The trends are striking: escalating disaster impacts, more disaster clustering, more disaster cascades, and less predictability. We need to up our game. Lisa Grow Sun and I discuss the implications in a new paper, but here are a few of the key takeaways.

Clarissa Libertelli | June 8, 2021

Waiting for a Reckoning: Reflections on World Oceans Day, the BP Oil Spill, and Worker Safety

World Oceans Day marks a time to reflect on how our oceans connect to human and environmental health. This year’s theme of “Life and Livelihoods” comes at a time when our federal government is turning to energy jobs and climate justice. As the BP/Deepwater Horizon oil spill of 2010 showed, the lives and livelihoods of millions are affected by how we manage ocean policy. Eleven years later, will policy adapt to prioritize human and environmental health over business?

Daniel Farber | June 7, 2021

The Turning Tide

Some events last week sent a strong signal that the tide is turning against fossil fuels. Each of the events standing alone would have been noteworthy. The clustering of these events dramatizes an important shift. To paraphrase Churchill, this may not be beginning of the end for fossil fuels, but at least it is the end of the beginning of the campaign against them.

Maggie Dewane | June 3, 2021

Connect the Dots Podcast Explores Clean Energy Policy and Local, State, and Federal Governance

In this episode of Connect the Dots, host Rob Verchick and his guests discuss energy policy at different levels of government and who's leading the way in the clean energy journey.

Karen Sokol | May 27, 2021

Drilled News Op-Ed: The Supreme Court’s Obscure Procedural Ruling In Baltimore’s Climate Case, Explained

Member Scholar Karen Sokol submitted an op-ed to the online outlet, Drilled News, on the Supreme Court's minor procedural ruling in the Baltimore climate case and its potentially major implications.

Daniel Farber | May 24, 2021

Getting the Lead Out

Lead can cause neurological damage to young children and developing fetuses. The only really safe level is zero. Because poor children are the most likely to be exposed to this hazard, this is also a major environmental justice issue. The Trump EPA took the position that it could set a hazard level higher than zero because of the cost of reaching a lower threshold. In a split decision, the Ninth Circuit reversed. The statutory issues are complicated, and a dissent raised some reasonable arguments. Ultimately, though, it's hard to believe Congress wanted EPA to misrepresent that a certain level of lead is safe for children when it really isn't.