Join us.

We’re working to create a just society and preserve a healthy environment for future generations. Donate today to help.

Donate

Romney’s Views About Climate Policy: A Detailed Timeline

Cross-posted from Legal Planet.

There has been considerable discussion of Governor Romney's views about the causes of climate change and about policies such as cap and trade.  It's not easy, however, to find detailed documentation.  For that reason, I've assembled as much information as I could find about what Romney has said and done over the years, with links to sources (including video or original documents when I could find them).

Jan. 2003.  Romney takes office as Governor of Massachusetts.

July 21, 2003.  In a letter to New York Governor George Pataki, Romney says : “Thank you for your invitation to embark on a cooperative northeast process to reduce the power plant pollution that is harming our climate.  I concur that climate change is beginning to effect on sic our natural resources and that now is the time to take action toward climate protection. . . . I believe that our joint work to create a flexible market-based regional cap and trade system could serve as an effective approach to meeting these goals.”

Jan. 2004 to July 2005. “During his first 18 months as governor of Massachusetts, Mitt Romney spent considerable time hammering out a sweeping climate change plan to reduce the state's greenhouse gas emissions.”  (L.A. Times).

May 6, 2004.  Romney announces the Massachusetts Climate Protection Plan.  The Plan was Massachusetts’ effort to implement a regional climate change plan adopted by the New England Governors and Eastern Canadian Premiers (NEG/ECP) in August 2001.  The plan’s medium term goal was to reduce GHG emissions 10% below 1990 levels by 2020. The plan stresses voluntary measures by business in conjunction with a carbon registry and with carbon reductions by government – but it also says: “Massachusetts is committed to active participation in the effort to develop a multi-state cap and trade program covering greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions.”

According to Romney, the plan would make sense because of its other benefits even if it turned out later that climate change was not a problem:  “Although many of the policies will not be easy to implement, the benefits will be long-lasting and enormous – benefits to our health, our economy, our quality of life, our very landscape. These are actions we can and must take now, if we are to have ‘no regrets’ when we transfer our temporary stewardship of this earth to the next generation.”  Also, the plan states, “A consensus of climate change scientists agrees that the increasing concentrations of GHGs are causing a rise in average global temperatures.”

Nov. 7, 2005.  “On Nov. 7, 2005, Mr. Romney hailed the proposed nine-state climate-change agreement the RGGI cap-and trade system as ‘good business’ that would spur investment in renewable energy while having only moderate effects on energy bills.”  Then “alarm bells went off in the business community.”  Later, Romney said he became concerned about the lack of a cap on permit prices. (Wall Street Journal).

Dec. 2005.  Romney changes course on regional cap-and-trade program (RGGI): “in mid-December Romney abruptly pulled his state out — despite the fact that several staffers in his administration had spent two and a half years and more than half a million dollars negotiating and shaping the deal.” (Salon).

Dec. 2005.  Romney announces he will not run for reelection as governor.  (Boston Globe).

2006.  “Laying the foundation of a presidential candidacy, Governor Mitt Romney has spent all or part of 212 days outside Massachusetts so far in 2006, an average of more than four days on the road each week, a Globe review of his public schedules shows.”  (Boston Globe).

March 16, 2006.  Romney signs smart-growth legislation. (press release).

2007-2008.  Romney’s first presidential run.

Feb. 23, 2007. “Unfortunately, some in the Republican Party are embracing the radical environmental ideas of the liberal left. As governor, I found that thoughtful environmentalism need not be anti-growth and anti-jobs. But Kyoto-style sweeping mandates, imposed unilaterally in the United States, would kill jobs, depress growth and shift manufacturing to the dirtiest developing nations. . . . Republicans should never abandon pro-growth conservative principles in an effort to embrace the ideas of Al Gore. Instead of sweeping mandates, we must use America's power of innovation to develop alternative sources of energy and new technologies that use energy more efficiently."  (UCSB).

May 2007.  “There are a lot of people who are concerned about global warming. I think we're probably experiencing a change in our climate. Human activity may well be contributing to it. I think it probably is. What I don't know is how much of the change is due to human activity, and what action we can take that would change the trajectory of the things we're seeing. “ (emphasis added) He calls for “no regrets” policies and says the developing countries must share in any effort to set an international cap. (video here).

2010.  In his book, No Apology, Romney says: "I believe that climate change is occurring. ... I also believe that human activity is a contributing factor. I am uncertain how much of the warming, however, is attributable to man and how much is attributable to factors out of our control." (emphasis added) He discusses swapping the payroll tax for a carbon tax, comparing this option favorably with cap-and-trade as a policy measure. He opposes unilateral U.S. action such as a cap-and-trade policy as economically disastrous and ineffective.

June 2011.  Romney announces presidential run.

June 3, 2011.  Romney: "I think it's important for us to reduce our emissions of pollutants and greenhouse gases that may well be significant contributors to the climate change and global warming that you're seeing,"  (Politico)

Oct. 28, 2011.  Speaking at the Consol Energy Center, Romney said, "My view is that we don't know what's causing climate change on this planet." (NPR)  He also says “I do not believe in a cap and trade program.”  The speech stresses energy independence and aggressive development of fossil fuels, saying “let the drillers start drilling.”  (Video here)

May 30, 2012.  Romney cinches nomination with Texas primary win.  (Fox)

July 11, 2012.  According to a campaign surrogate: “Although Romney does not support EPA's climate regulations, he is ‘certainly not a denier’ when it comes to the reality of climate change and the fact that human activities are contributing to rising global temperatures . . . But he does not believe unilateral regulations in the United States would be effective because of rising emissions from countries in the developing world, such as India and China.”  (E&E News).

Showing 2,817 results

Daniel Farber | July 31, 2012

Romney’s Views About Climate Policy: A Detailed Timeline

Cross-posted from Legal Planet. There has been considerable discussion of Governor Romney’s views about the causes of climate change and about policies such as cap and trade.  It’s not easy, however, to find detailed documentation.  For that reason, I’ve assembled as much information as I could find about what Romney has said and done over […]

| July 26, 2012

Planting the Seeds of the Future: The Plant Genetic Resources Treaty

a(broad) perspective Today’s post is the sixth in a series on a recent CPR white paper, Reclaiming Global Environmental Leadership: Why the United States Should Ratify Ten Pending Environmental Treaties.  Each month, this series will discuss one of these treaties.  Previous posts are here. International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture Adopted […]

Rena Steinzor | July 25, 2012

Member Scholar John Knox Appointed to United Nations Post on Human Rights and the Environment

CPR Member Scholar John Knox has been appointed the U.N. Human Rights Council’s first Independent Expert on Human Rights and the Environment. The position was created in March with a mandate to study the relationship of human rights and the environment, and prepare a series of reports to the Human Rights Council over the next […]

Robert Adler | July 24, 2012

The Conundrum of Responding to Crippling Drought: Help Now or Reduce Future Vulnerability?

The relentless heat wave that has plagued much of the country this summer, along with an accompanying paucity of rain, have plunged vast swaths of the United States into the most crippling drought in decades. Corn crops and now soy crops are withering, and commodity prices have risen dramatically. That could signal a sharp rise […]

Daniel Farber | July 23, 2012

Don’t Knock EPA’s Knack for NAAQS

Cross-posted from Legal Planet. On Tuesday, the D.C. Circuit decided American Petroleum Institute (API) v. EPA, an interesting case dealing with nitrogen oxide (NO2) levels. The standard is supposed to include a margin of safety.Under the Clean Air Act, EPA sets National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for airborne substances that endanger human health or […]

Thomas McGarity | July 19, 2012

CPR White Paper: The Next OSHA — Progressive Reforms to Empower Workers

The Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 is one of the surviving monuments of the era of progressive social legislation (extending from the mid-1960s through the mid-1970s) during which Congress enacted the nation’s foundational health, safety and environmental laws. That statute empowered the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) to write safety and health […]

Aimee Simpson | July 18, 2012

FDA Takes Baby Step Toward Protecting the Public from BPA

Yesterday, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced that it would amend an existing food additive regulation to prohibit the use of Bisphenol A (BPA) in “infant feeding bottles (baby bottles) and spill-proof cups, including their closures and lids, designed to help train babies and toddlers to drink from cups (sippy cups).”  BPA, a […]

Ben Somberg | July 18, 2012

White House Now Not Sure it is Interested at All in Public’s Ideas for Strengthening Existing Rules

The White House’s message on its program for retrospectively reviewing existing regulations just shifted a little further away from recognizing the need for protective regulations for health, safety, and the environment. First the White House said it was interested in “expanding” certain existing regulations, if appropriate. Then it said it was interested in hearing ideas […]

Daniel Farber | July 17, 2012

Climate Strategies: ‘One Step at a Time’ or ‘Don’t Jump the Gun’??

Cross-posted from Legal Planet. In some situations, voluntary efforts leads other people to join in, whereas in others, it encourages them to hold back.  There’s a similar issue about climate mitigation efforts at the national, regional, or state level.  Do these efforts really move the ball forward?  Or are they counterproductive, because other places increase their […]