Join us.

We’re working to create a just society and preserve a healthy environment for future generations. Donate today to help.

Donate

Alt v. EPA: EPA’s control over CAFOs shrinks again

Lois Alt is a 61-year-old grandmother who sued EPA in federal court arguing that her large chicken farming operation is exempt from Clean Water Act (CWA) permitting requirements. On October 23, the judge ruled in her favor in an alarming decision that could mean thousands of other large industrial farming operations do not need permits. 

The case began when EPA found Ms. Alt in violation of the CWA for discharging without a permit. EPA ordered her to apply for one and informed her that, under the law, she could be subject to civil or criminal penalties. The agency later withdrew the notice, essentially mooting the case. Nevertheless, Judge Bailey felt compelled to rule on the merits.

The facts are not disputed. Ventilation fans blow litter and manure out of Ms. Alt’s eight chicken houses. Rainwater washes this pollution from the yard surrounding the chicken houses into Mudlick Run, a nearby stream, by means of “man-made ditches” (opinion, p.5). Normally, a concentrated animal feeding operation (CAFO) like Ms. Alt’s must get a permit to discharge into surface waters. Congress added a provision to the CWA in 1987 excusing agricultural stormwater discharges from permitting requirements. EPA has construed this exemption as only covering areas in which manure was applied to land in accordance with specific guidelines. Judge Bailey’s decision—that the discharge from Ms. Alt’s farm fits under the CWA’s agricultural stormwater exemption—would greatly extend the scope of the exemption.

Ms. Alt raises about 200,000 birds a year in her eight chicken houses. She is part of a nationwide trend toward larger and more consolidated animal agriculture operations. Chicken farms across the country have consolidated over the past 60 years, with production per farm increasing a thousand-fold. These massive operations have significant consequences for the health of the Chesapeake Bay and other waterways. They are such a concern that Congress specifically wrote them into the Clean Water Act, a notable move given that agriculture is generally exempt from the act.

Although EPA has a specific statutory mandate to regulate CAFOs, its oversight has been spotty and controversial. For the most part, the agricultural industry has escaped any meaningful regulation and it is fighting tooth and nail to hang on to this privileged status. Through the American Farm Bureau Federation, its powerful and well-funded trade association, the farm lobby has used every available tool to cripple efforts to regulate CAFOs, filing lawsuits and mounting PR campaigns.

The Alt case is just another example.

Ms. Alt was an ideal plaintiff. She is “a proud West Virginian, a loving mother and a doting grandmother,” according to the Bay Journal. She is a longtime electrician for the construction industry who invested her life savings into her West Virginia chicken farm.

But that’s just one side of the story.

A peak behind the curtain reveals that Big Ag was pulling the strings. According to the Bay Journal, the West Virginia Farm Bureau bankrolled Ms. Alt’s case. The American Farm Bureau Federation, which recently lost its lawsuit against EPA claiming that the entire Bay TMDL was outside the agency’s authority, was granted intervener status. Ms. Alt raises chickens for Pilgrim's Pride, which, according to its website, is the second-largest chicken producer in the world. The company employs approximately 38,000 people and has the capacity to process more than 36 million birds per week. Ms. Alt is one of about 3,900 contract growers who supply poultry for the company's operations. 

The decision, if it stands, could affect thousands of CAFOs, with disastrous consequences for clean waterways across the country. It could also succeed in tying up the courts in endless litigation, with each CAFO questioning whether its discharge is exempt from the CWA and requiring courts to decide each case one by one.

EPA is weighing its options and the environmental groups that intervened in the case may appeal. For the sake of clean water across the country, let’s hope they win.

 

 

Showing 2,818 results

Anne Havemann | November 5, 2013

Alt v. EPA: EPA’s control over CAFOs shrinks again

Lois Alt is a 61-year-old grandmother who sued EPA in federal court arguing that her large chicken farming operation is exempt from Clean Water Act (CWA) permitting requirements. On October 23, the judge ruled in her favor in an alarming decision that could mean thousands of other large industrial farming operations do not need permits.  […]

Amy Sinden | November 5, 2013

CPR Scholars: ACUS’ recommendations to OIRA fall short

Since the Reagan Administration, federal agencies have been required by Executive Order to send their major rules to the White House’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) for review before releasing them to the public. OIRA review consists of, among other things, ensuring that agencies subject their rules to cost-benefit analysis to make sure the […]

Sidney A. Shapiro | October 30, 2013

Senate Republicans against DC Circuit Court nominees: talking through their hats

This week, it was reported that Senate Democrats plan to force a vote to confirm one judicial nominee to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals if Republican Senators continue to block the nominee’s confirmation. Patricia Ann Millett, who has worked for Democratic and Republican administrations in the past, is the contested candidate.  Although the circuit […]

Rena Steinzor | October 29, 2013

The coal ash rule rises like the phoenix: Judge Reggie Walton orders EPA to get the rule back on track within 60 days, congratulations to Earthjustice and its clients

Congratulations to our friends at Earthjustice and their clients for a tremendous victory in federal district court today. Judge Reggie Walton (a George W. Bush appointee) ordered the Obama Administration to provide a schedule for regulating coal ash within the next 60 days.   This epic battle now shifts back to the White House and Congress where […]

Sidney A. Shapiro | October 28, 2013

New CPR Issue Alert on toxics: reform must help, not hinder states and victims’ rights

In the United States, the framework for safeguarding people and the environment against the dangers of toxic chemicals comprises three mutually reinforcing legal systems: federal regulation, state and federal civil justice systems, and state regulation. Each part of the framework however, has been substantially weakened — the civil justice systems by years of tort “reform,” and […]

Michael Patoka | October 25, 2013

White House changes to food import rule weaken consumer protections

Last Friday, the FDA posted the revisions the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) made to two food safety rules drafted by the agency two years ago. The proposed rules were issued under the Food Safety and Modernization Act, which Congress passed in the wake of widespread food safety disasters. As we’ve mentioned […]

Matt Shudtz | October 24, 2013

OSHA’s new tools for addressing chemical hazards could bolster enforcement

Today OSHA announced two new web-based resources designed to help employers eliminate chemical hazards in the workplace. Both the toolkit for identifying less-hazardous substitutes and the annotated exposure limits table are useful informational resources designed to promote voluntary action by conscientious employers and informed demands by workers and their advocates. But OSHA has to deal with both […]

Matt Shudtz | October 23, 2013

SBA’s Office of Advocacy wants even more time to review OSHA’s silica proposal

SBA’s Office of Advocacy has added its voice to the chorus of business interests who want OSHA to delay publication of a new rule that would protect workers from the deadly effects of silica exposure. In a letter to OSHA chief David Michaels, the top lawyers from the Office of Advocacy claim that it will be […]

Holly Doremus | October 23, 2013

Mass. v. EPA bears fruit for environmental petitioners

Court rules that EPA must decide if new water quality standards are needed to protect the Gulf of Mexico A US District Court in Louisiana recently ruled, in Gulf Restoration Network v. Jackson, that EPA must decide whether it has to impose new water quality standards for nutrient pollution in the Mississippi River watershed. Although […]