Join us.

We’re working to create a just society and preserve a healthy environment for future generations. Donate today to help.

Donate

In State of the Union, Biden Pays Little Heed to Climate Justice

In his second State of the Union address, President Joe Biden hailed his administration’s significant accomplishments over the last two years and called on lawmakers to “finish the job” on a wide variety of policy issues. He uttered the phrase over and over — more than a dozen times, in fact — in relation to everything from repairing the economy and controlling the cost of prescription drugs to expanding access to affordable health insurance and making the tax code fairer.

About a third of the way through his 73-minute speech, he called on the country to “finish the job” when it comes to climate change.

“We have an obligation, not to ourselves, but to our children and our grandchildren to confront it,” he said. “I’m proud of how America at last is stepping up to the challenge. We’re still going to need oil and gas for a while. … But there’s so much more to do. We’ve got to finish the job.”

Agreed.

We must finish this job (if that phrase can even be applied to such a “super wicked problem,” as the climate crisis is often called).

And yes, there is “so much more” our nation must do to keep global temperatures below 1.5 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels — the goal of the international climate accord that America reentered on Biden’s first day in office back in January 2021.

Global average temperatures have already risen about 1 degree Celsius (2 degrees Fahrenheit) since the 1880s. The rise sounds small, but we’re already living with its huge, and deadly, effects: more extreme heat, more intense storms, more wildfires, and more scary news for all of us earthly inhabitants, human and otherwise.

Not Enough Attention on Climate Change

Last night, though, Biden didn’t go into much detail about how we might actually finish this monumental job, other than to point to existing incentives in the Inflation Reduction Act and the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law to address climate change and accelerate the transition to clean energy. He pointed specifically to tax credits that enable families to purchase electric vehicles and energy-efficient appliances and efforts to conserve public lands.

“We’re just getting started,” he continued, and then took an opportunity to poke those Republicans who voted against the infrastructure law. “I’ll see you at the groundbreaking,” he quipped, referencing the many important (and likely popular) government-funded projects in the offing.

These laws are important steps our nation is taking to address the climate crisis — historic even. But again, we must do much more and go much further to, quote, “finish the job,” and our nation’s public officials need to spend more time talking about it.

To wit: In Biden’s address last night, the word “climate” appeared three times.

Three. Times.

In a speech of more than 9,000 words. On arguably the defining issue of our era.

As mentioned above, the president did go into more detail than the three specific mentions of the word “climate.” And to be sure, the economy polls much higher on the list of Americans’ priorities than climate and the environment.

But our changing climate is affecting “everything, everywhere, all at once,” to quote Melissa Aronczyk, an associate professor of journalism and media studies at Rutgers University, who was herself quoting the eponymous sci-fi action flick.

“We live in a world that demands that we put climate at the center of everything we do,” she said yesterday during a webinar on how to effectively communicate about climate change.

While Biden touted climate and clean energy progress in his speech and laid out plans for more work ahead, his message was at times muddled. And it was pretty far from the “center” of his address.

No Mention of Climate Justice

The word “environment” didn’t appear in the president’s address, either; nor did the word “air” (though it did show up in the word “airlines,” which he also mentioned three times).

What's worse, he made no mention of the phrases “climate justice” or “environmental justice”; indeed, neither phrase appeared in the speech (though, in fairness, he did discuss some related issues, such as the need to ensure access to clean water, to replace toxic lead pipes that damage brain function and disproportionately affect low-wealth people and communities of color, and to cut pollution in and bring clean energy jobs to “communities often left behind”).

To be sure, Biden pledged to address environmental justice on the campaign trail, and he signed an executive order on his first day in office to direct at least 40 percent of federal investments to disadvantaged communities.

The administration needs to promote this important work and do more to ensure the most marginalized among us no longer bear the greatest brunt of pollution, floods, extreme heat, and other climate impacts.

One place to start is by promoting — and convincing Congress to pass — the Environmental Justice for All Act, which, as my former colleague Hannah Klaus noted, would “pave the way for remedying a long history of environmental harm and racism and ensuring the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of all people with respect to the development, implementation, and enforcement of health and environmental laws and regulations.”

We at the Center for Progressive Reform are making climate justice a top priority — and we want to hear more about it from our public officials. In fact, we demand it. It’s gratifying that Biden will be touting climate and energy policies in a climate messaging “blitz” in the days to come, but as Aronczyk argues, climate must be at the center of his communications, starting with his major annual address to we, the people.

Read about our climate justice work, subscribe to our email list, and support our fund for climate justice.

Showing 2,817 results

Protestors holding a climate justice sign

Allison Stevens | February 8, 2023

In State of the Union, Biden Pays Little Heed to Climate Justice

In his second State of the Union address, President Joe Biden hailed his administration’s significant accomplishments over the last two years and called on lawmakers to “finish the job” on a wide variety of policy issues. He uttered the phrase over and over — more than a dozen times, in fact — in relation to everything from repairing the economy and controlling the cost of prescription drugs to expanding access to affordable health insurance and making the tax code fairer. About a third of the way through his 73-minute speech, he called on the country to “finish the job” when it comes to climate change.

US Capitol Building behind green trees

Daniel Farber | February 7, 2023

When Bad Things Happen to Good Regulations

In their crusade against “wokeness,” congressional Republicans are taking aim at a Labor Department rule about pension plan investments. The rule’s transgression is apparently that it makes it easier for pension plans to consider how climate-related risks might affect a company’s bottom line. To avoid being woke, the GOP would apparently prefer pension managers to close their eyes to financial realities, sleepwalking their way through the climate crisis. The real fear, of course, is that more wide-awake investment might disfavor some of the GOP’s biggest corporate supporters.

James Goodwin | January 31, 2023

Biden Administration’s Long-Overdue Regulatory Reforms Are Expected Soon. Here’s What to Look For.

Where are President Joe Biden’s regulatory process reforms? That’s the question many progressive advocates have been asking since the administration released its Day One memo inaugurating a “process with the goal of producing a set of recommendations for improving and modernizing regulatory review.” Two years later, this process remains in limbo.

Rebecca Bratspies | January 20, 2023

What’s In a Name? Urban Infrastructure and Social Justice

Arriving in New York City, you might take the Van Wyck Expressway past the Jackie Robinson Parkway on your way from JFK airport. Or you might cross the Kościuszko Bridge as you travel from LaGuardia airport. Or you might take the George Washington Bridge to the Major Deegan Expressway. Or, you might use the Goethals Bridge, or the Pulaski Skyway, or the Outerbridge Crossing. What, if anything, would those trips tell you about the city (other than that we desperately need better mass transit)? All this infrastructure commemorates individuals who helped shape the city’s history. Yet, few people remember that, before these names became a shorthand for urban congestion, they were actual people.

James Goodwin | January 18, 2023

To Preserve Our Constitutional Order, We Need More Federal Judges Like Brandeis

The federal judiciary is in crisis. Now stocked with conservative jurists who openly disdain the courts’ limited constitutional role and actively dismiss the public they serve, this critical branch of our government presents an unacceptable risk to the stability of our democracy and economy. But there are solutions at hand.

chemical barrels or drums

Robert L. Glicksman | January 17, 2023

Fixing What’s Wrong with Environmental Enforcement

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and its environmental regulatory state partners have engaged in many important successful efforts to foster compliance with regulatory obligations through enforcement actions and otherwise. But in her new book, Next Generation Compliance: Environmental Regulation in the Modern Era, Cynthia Giles documents widespread and significant noncompliance with these obligations.

James Goodwin | January 12, 2023

Biden’s New Open Government Plan Lays Out a Progressive Regulatory Reform Agenda

In case you missed it, the Biden administration capped off 2022 with the release of a new “open government” plan that aims to improve access to federal data and information, better engage the public in the regulatory process, and streamline delivery of government services and benefits.

Power lines in rural North Carolina

Ajulo Othow, Sidney A. Shapiro | January 11, 2023

Op-Ed: Clean, Affordable Electricity For All

This op-ed was originally published in the Winston-Salem (North Carolina) Journal and the Greensboro (North Carolina) News & Record. The Winston-Salem Journal recently reported that Walmart had joined environmental and climate advocates in opposition to Duke Energy’s proposed carbon reduction plan, which is now under review by the N.C. Energy Commission. In the clash of […]

air pollution

Daniel Farber | January 10, 2023

Learning to Name Environmental Problems

There are U.S. Supreme Court cases going back a century or more dealing with what we would now consider environmental issues, such as preserving nature or air pollution. But when did the Court start seeing filthy rivers and smoky cities as embodiments of the same problem, despite their striking physical differences? And when did it start thinking of “wilderness” as a good thing rather than a failure to use available resources?