Join us.

We’re working to create a just society and preserve a healthy environment for future generations. Donate today to help.

Donate

On Strike for Climate Justice and Workers’ Rights

Tomorrow (September 20), I'm standing up for workers' rights by marching to the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., as part of the Global Climate Strike. I'll be walking in solidarity with the students and youth organizing the strike to spread the message that climate action is imperative.                      

Addressing the growing climate crisis and creating jobs are two necessary actions often pitted against each other, as if only one were possible at a time. That's a false choice, misleading rhetoric created by the fossil fuel industry and climate science deniers in Congress to slow down government action while continuing to pass the cost of dirty energy extraction onto families and communities – both in dollars and in health consequences. The reality is that we can have both good, green jobs and a healthy environment; thriving workers and a thriving planet go together.

Discussions about climate change often start with the environmental solutions required to curb carbon pollution, from shifting to renewable energy sources to regenerative agriculture. These discussions are critical, but we can't forget about workers. Many are significantly impacted by the effects of climate change, and we could end up uprooting the lives of many more if we do not account for them in our climate plans.

Climate change, left unabated, poses significant health and safety hazards to millions of workers, such as more frequent and intense exposure to extreme heat and extreme weather events, air pollution, toxic chemicals, and vector-borne illnesses. While workers continue to labor in increasingly hazardous conditions, their productivity will likely decline in an effort to maintain their health and safety, posing economic risks to working families and employers. What is more, inaction will increase the likelihood of illness, resulting in more days away from work, while more frequent and more extreme weather events will wreak havoc on existing infrastructure, making it more difficult for workers to commute and costly for businesses to rebuild. If that doesn't sound like an idyllic future, we have to stop the wait-and-see approach and instead act with determination and courage right now.

Taking action to combat climate change will also affect workers' health, safety, and economic well-being, which is why workers must be at the center of the conversation. For example, transitioning away from fossil fuel extraction to renewable energy sources will result in businesses disappearing and workers losing their jobs. But at the same time, millions of jobs will be created in the new, green energy economy. We must put plans in place to ensure we leave no one behind, whether by guaranteeing a just transition to a new job or, for older workers, into retirement. We must ensure that all workers have good, fair-paying jobs, job training programs, good health care, and the right to organize.

The bottom line: Climate change will affect our lives. The only question is whether we want to prepare our families, our businesses, and ourselves for the future ahead, or follow the path that the fossil fuel industry has mapped out for us: letting the escalating climate crisis create chaos so that they can continue to rake in profits in the short term. I choose to stand with the strikers on Friday, calling for action right now.

Showing 2,823 results

Katie Tracy | September 19, 2019

On Strike for Climate Justice and Workers’ Rights

Tomorrow (September 20), I'm standing up for workers' rights by marching to the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., as part of the Global Climate Strike. I'll be walking in solidarity with the students and youth organizing the strike to spread the message that climate action is imperative.                  […]

David Hunter | September 18, 2019

The World Bank Considers Stepping Back from Accountability

For nearly two years, the World Bank Board of Directors has fumbled what should be an easy decision to modernize its Inspection Panel, the primary institution that addresses the damage the Bank's lending can do to local communities. At issue is whether the Panel should be able to monitor the Bank's implementation of Management Action […]

Joel A. Mintz | September 16, 2019

Abolition of Supplemental Environmental Projects: A Damaging Retreat for Environmental Enforcement

Late last month, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) quietly took a major step to undercut the enforcement of our federal pollution control laws. In a publicly released but little publicized memorandum, DOJ’s Associate Attorney General for Environment and Natural Resources, Jeffrey Bossert Clark, announced that the agency will no longer approve enforcement case settlements […]

Amy Sinden | September 16, 2019

Overshoot: Trump’s Deregulatory Zeal Goes Beyond Even Where Industry Asks Him to Go

Originally published in The Revelator. Reprinted under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 3.0. The Trump EPA last month proposed a new plan to remove oil and gas developers’ responsibility for detecting and fixing methane leaks in their wells, pipelines and storage operations. This proposal to axe the Obama-era methane rule is notable for two reasons. […]

Daniel Farber | September 16, 2019

A Welcome Victory in the D.C. Circuit

Originally published on Legal Planet. Last Friday, the D.C. Circuit decided Wisconsin v. EPA. The federal appeals court rejected industry attacks on a regulation dealing with interstate air pollution but accepted an argument by environmental groups that the regulation was too weak. Last week also featured depressing examples of the drumbeat of Trump administration rollbacks, […]

Daniel Farber | September 9, 2019

Trump’s Legal Challenges to the California Car Deal

Originally published on Legal Planet. Prompting rage by President Trump, California and several carmakers entered into a voluntary agreement on carbon emissions from new cars that blew past the administration's efforts to repeal existing federal requirements. Last week, the Trump administration slapped back at California. Although there's been a lot of editorializing about that response, […]

Daniel Farber | September 5, 2019

Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Next President

Originally published on Legal Planet. Under executive orders dating back to President Ronald Reagan, regulatory agencies like EPA are supposed to follow cost-benefit analysis when making decisions. Under the Trump administration, however, cost-benefit analysis has barely even served as window-dressing for its deregulatory actions. It has launched a series of efforts to prevent full counting […]

David Flores | September 5, 2019

Hurricane Dorian May Brush Virginia, Bringing Danger of Toxic Floodwaters

In August, Virginians remembered the devastation wrought by Hurricane Camille 50 years earlier. After making landfall on the Gulf Coast, that storm dumped dozens of inches of rain in western portions of the Commonwealth and killed more than 150 people in flash floods and landslides. Today, Virginians along the Atlantic coast and in the Hampton […]

Evan Isaacson | September 3, 2019

The Ball Is Back in EPA’s Court Following Release of Final Bay Restoration Plans

Last week, the six Chesapeake Bay states and the District of Columbia posted their final plans to meet the 2025 pollution reduction targets under the Bay cleanup effort known as the Chesapeake Bay Total Maximum Daily Load ("Bay TMDL" for short). These final Watershed Implementation Plans (WIPs) were, by and large, little different from the […]