Nearly 100 million Americans endured scorching temperatures this summer, and similar heat waves and other extreme weather are on track to occur more frequently across the country due to climate change.
Climate change poses a serious threat to occupational health and safety. Workers — especially low-income workers and those who work outdoors — are particularly vulnerable to rising temperatures and increasingly frequent extreme weather and other climate-related disasters.
Workers’ ability to adapt to or escape the effects of climate change is constrained by their jobs and employers. Workers are being forced to choose between their safety and their livelihoods. This means workers are more likely to suffer long-lasting financial problems as a result of extreme weather events, further limiting their choices.
Working in extreme heat
Workers in agriculture, construction, transportation, and manufacturing are often exposed to extreme heat and are most at risk of heat stress-related injury and fatality. Workers who toil in extreme heat are at risk of heat stress and heat stroke. Heat stroke occurs when the body’s temperature rises rapidly, and it can cause permanent disability or even death if the individual does not receive emergency treatment.
The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) reports that 259 workers died from exposure to extreme heat between 2016 and 2020 and thousands more suffered serious heat-related injuries. Those numbers are likely much lower than the reality because BLS almost exclusively relies on companies to voluntarily report worker fatalities. A report from Public Citizen, for example, found that heat exposure is likely responsible for upward of 2,000 worker deaths each year.
Farmworkers die from heat stroke at a rate 20 times greater than the rate for all U.S. civilian workers. Currently, agricultural workers experience an average of 21 days a year when the heat index surpasses workplace safety standards; by 2050, the number of unsafe work days is expected to nearly double to 39 days each year. Workers who are paid based on how much crop they harvest face financial incentives to skip breaks to rest and hydrate, and many states don’t enforce break and hydration standards where they exist.
The occupational hazards posed by climate change disproportionately affect workers of color. Black and Latino workers bear the brunt of heat-related occupational risks because they are overrepresented in outdoor jobs like agriculture and construction. Since 2010, Hispanic workers have accounted for a third of all heat fatalities, despite making up only 17 percent of the U.S. workforce.
The health risks associated with climate-related hazards in the workplace are exacerbated for low-income workers, often through inadequate housing or transportation. For example, inadequate housing can include people who are unhoused, live in overcrowded shelters or in migrant housing provided by their employer, who are incarcerated, or live in uninhabitable conditions because of landlord neglect. Inadequate transportation can refer to walking long distances in extreme heat, long outdoor wait times for public transportation, and more.
No worker should die from heat
Heat stress and heat stroke are preventable diseases when adequate workplace regulations are enforced. Currently, however, there is no national standard regulating extreme heat in the workplace.
For years, worker safety advocates have been calling on the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) to implement standards for hazardous heat conditions. In October 2021, OSHA finally initiated the rulemaking process to develop a standard for heat injury and illness prevention at work. Implementing a final standard, however, could take years — it takes OSHA an average of seven years, and as long as 19 years, to develop and issue safety standards. In the face of climate change, this is time workers don’t have.
The agency is also facing intense opposition from industries that would be affected by a national heat safety standard, hampering the rulemaking process. Advocates worry that if OSHA does not establish a standard by 2024, the issue will be abandoned if the White House changes hands, and it could be years before the agency returns attention to the problem.
Rep. Judy Chu’s (D-Cal.) Asuncion Valdivia Heat Illness and Fatality Prevention Act of 2021 would address some of these concerns and difficulties by establishing a two-year deadline for OSHA to promulgate a standard to prevent excessive heat exposure at work. The bill is named after a worker who died from heat stroke after working for 10 straight hours in 105-degree heat. If this legislation passes, it would emphasize the urgency around extreme heat and ramp up pressure on OSHA to establish enforceable standards.
Although a heat safety standard may be years away, OSHA announced a National Emphasis Program in April 2022 that outlines targeted enforcement policies to minimize heat-related injury and death. As part of the program, OSHA will proactively inspect workplaces in 70 high-risk industries when the National Weather Service announces a heat warning for the area. These policies are authorized under OSHA’s authority to ensure workers have a hazard-free workplace.
As temperatures continue to rise across the country, more workers will die from extreme heat. It is more important than ever for OSHA to establish an enforceable heat safety standard to eliminate entirely preventable heat-related fatalities.
Showing 2,829 results
Grace DuBois | August 31, 2022
Climate change poses a serious threat to occupational health and safety. Workers — especially low-income workers and those who work outdoors — are particularly vulnerable to rising temperatures and increasingly frequent extreme weather and other climate-related disasters.
Daniel Farber | August 19, 2022
Production and combustion of fossil fuels impose enormous costs on society, which the industry doesn't pay for. I want to talk about some options for using the tax system to change that.
Alexandra Rogan, James Goodwin | August 18, 2022
The Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) will subsidize our nation's clean energy revolution and have a positive impact on climate-driven economics, as noted in Part I of this series. That said, the IRA isn't flawless. Notably, it includes several subsidies for fossil fuels, which will be counterproductive as our nation works toward its climate goals. Worse still, not all "carrots" for clean energy technologies are good, and the IRA includes a potentially bad one. Specifically, the IRA risks subsidizing the clean energy transition through perpetuating environmental injustice in how we obtain and use energy to fuel our economy.
Alexandra Rogan, James Goodwin | August 18, 2022
With the signature of President Joe Biden, the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) now marks the most significant climate policy action the United States has ever taken. The defining feature of this law is that it seeks to wring carbon dioxide emissions out of the U.S. economy by relying heavily on policy "carrots," like subsidies, instead of policy "sticks," such as regulating the fossil fuel industry or attempting to capture the external costs of greenhouse gas emissions through carbon pricing.
James Goodwin | August 10, 2022
After more than 50 years, the Clean Air Act is due for an upgrade to account for changing circumstances. We can now recognize how the law is insufficiently attentive to the realities of structural racism and systemic disparities in environmental protections. Polluters have exacerbated these problems by weaponizing uncertainty to oppose stronger protections for those who need them most. In speaking to both challenges, the Public Health Air Quality Act would help ensure that the Clean Air Act is well positioned to continue serving the American people for the next 50 years.
Daniel Farber | August 8, 2022
What wetlands and waterbodies does the Clean Water Act protect? Congress failed to provide a clear answer when it passed the statute, and the issue has been a bone of contention ever since. The Biden administration is in the process of issuing a new regulation on the subject. Normally, you'd expect the Supreme Court to wait to jump in until then. Instead, the Court reached out to grab Sackett v. EPA, where landowners take a really extreme position on the subject. Not a good sign.
Sophie Loeb | August 4, 2022
On July 27, I had the privilege of testifying at the North Carolina Utilities Commission (NCUC) public hearing regarding the Duke Energy Carbon Plan. The Asheville hearing was one of six forums designated for public witness testimony on the proposed decarbonization plan. In 2019, North Carolina joined 34 other states investing in solar, wind, and other renewable resources when it passed its Clean Energy Power Plan, and, in 2021, when it passed House Bill 951, which commits to a 70 percent carbon reduction by 2030 and carbon neutrality by 2050. When Duke Energy, a major corporation with outsized influence over the state’s decarbonization plan, submitted its proposal to meet those goals, it failed to account for affordability and equity.
Hannah Klaus | August 3, 2022
Last week, the Center for Progressive Reform joined 90 organizations in expressing strong support for the Environmental Justice for All Act in a letter as the bill went before the House Committee on Natural Resources for markup. The coalition, led by Coming Clean, a collaborative of environmental health and environmental justice experts, and the Environmental Justice Health Alliance for Chemical Policy Reform, urged committee members to advance this important legislation to the House floor. The bill, introduced by Reps. Raúl M. Grijalva of Arizona and Donald McEachin of Virginia, is the most significant effort by the federal government to address generations of environmental racism.
James Goodwin | July 27, 2022
The Biden administration’s path forward on climate change -- as the widely deployed metaphor goes -- has become more difficult with the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent decision in West Virginia vs. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). If the Biden administration is to successfully navigate that path -- and it must if we are to avert the worst consequences of the climate crisis -- the president will need to abandon the “compass” that his predecessors have relied on for decades to guide their policy agenda: Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review.