Join us.

We’re working to create a just society and preserve a healthy environment for future generations. Donate today to help.

Donate

The Thin Gray Line

Originally published on Legal Planet.

"Bureaucrat" is just another name for public servant. It has been said that a thin blue line of police protects us from the worst elements of society. But it is a thin gray line of underpaid, overworked, anonymous bureaucrats who protect society against more insidious risks – risks ranging from nuclear contamination to climate change to unsafe food. Due to Trump's government shutdown, many of these people are currently not being paid. Yet without the professionals who spend their careers as public servants, the government would be unable to perform its essential task of protecting us all against major risks.

That is the theme of Michael Lewis's book, The Fifth Risk. He tells the stories of some of the people who work ceaselessly to protect us, applying expert knowledge to deal with invisible threats. And Lewis also shows how those efforts are being undermined by an administration staffed with ideologues who don't have that expertise and don't care to listen to those who do.

For instance, Lewis tells the story of Catherine Woteki, a scientist at the Agriculture Department. In the 1960s, the University of Virginia didn't admit women, so she went to the "women's auxiliary" college. She was told that a woman couldn't get a job in basic research, so she went into agricultural science as a graduate student at Virginia Tech, where she studied an outbreak of illness among Mexican children in Texas. She has spent her career on issues relating to nutrition and food safety.

She had taken charge of food safety for meat and eggs, which are under USDA's jurisdiction. Later, she became the Department's chief scientist. Her department stopped the 2015 outbreak of bird flu from spreading by developing a quick test for the disease among poultry, which allowed flocks to be efficiently culled. One of her concerns was protecting the American food supply from climate change in ways like breeding sheep that can live at higher, cooler altitudes. Trump initially nominated his Iowa campaign manager to succeed her. When that didn't work out, he was forced to pick someone with a scientific background, an executive for a pesticide manufacturer.

Woteki's story is not the only one Lewis tells. There's Kathy Sullivan, a geologist who became an astronaut and later served as the Deputy and then Director of the National Atmospheric and Oceanic Administration (NOAA). She fought hard to get approval for an urgently needed weather satellite. She also got social science written into NOAA's mission, because it turns out that people often fail to act on storm warnings.

Kim Klockow at the National Weather Service is a behavioral economist investigating why people turn a deaf ear to warnings. What she found is that previous efforts to deal with this problem (giving people more time and more dramatic warnings) didn't work. The reason is that people think they're safe when there have been previous warnings that didn't result in a tornado near their home. What's needed are more geographically precise warnings so there will be fewer false alarms.

Of course, the people Lewis interviewed are only the tip of the iceberg. Think of all the people at EPA working on hazardous waste cleanups, toxic chemicals, pesticide safety, dangerous particulates in the air – and yes, climate change. Think of the FDA folks working to keep the food supply (everything except eggs and meat) safe and ensuring that drugs are safe to use and really work. And then there are those who worry about transportation safety, dangerous workplaces, nuclear accidents, and pandemics. And don't forget the Justice Department lawyers who bring civil suits and sometimes criminal cases to enforce these laws.

It's worth remembering some relevant words from George H.W. Bush:

"And I've not known a finer group of people than those that I have worked with in government. You're men and women of knowledge, ability, and integrity. And I saw that in the CIA. I saw that when I was in China. I saw it at the United Nations. And for the last 8 years, I saw that in every department and agency of the United States Government. And I saw that commitment to excellence in the Federal workers I came to know and respect in Washington, all across America, and, indeed, around the world. You work hard; you sacrifice. You deserve to be recognized, rewarded, and certainly appreciated."

Rail all you want to about faceless bureaucrats and big government. But without these dedicated public servants, our lives would all be much less safe.

Top photo by the Natural Resources Defense Council, used under a Creative Commons license.

Showing 2,818 results

Daniel Farber | January 8, 2019

The Thin Gray Line

Originally published on Legal Planet. "Bureaucrat" is just another name for public servant. It has been said that a thin blue line of police protects us from the worst elements of society. But it is a thin gray line of underpaid, overworked, anonymous bureaucrats who protect society against more insidious risks – risks ranging from nuclear […]

Daniel Farber | December 31, 2018

Seven Bright Spots of 2018

A version of this post was originally published on Legal Planet. Yes, it was a grim year in many ways. But there actually were some bright spots. Here are just the high points. Scott Pruitt. Pruitt resigned under fire. While his successor may be more successful in some ways, the fact remains that Pruitt was […]

James Goodwin | December 31, 2018

Top Ten Regulatory Policy Stories to Look Out for in 2019 (IMHO)

As I documented in my most recent post, 2018 was an active year for regulatory policy, bringing several notable controversies, milestones, and developments. For those who follow this area, 2019 promises to be just as lively and momentous. Indeed, it appears that the dynamics that spurred much of the regulatory policy-related action in 2018 – […]

Daniel Farber | December 31, 2018

The Year Ahead

A version of this post was originally published on Legal Planet. What are the key things to watch for in 2019 in the environmental area? Regulations. According to the Trump administration’s schedule, three big rules should be issued in March: repeal of the Waters of the United States rule (WOTUS), repeal and replacement of the Clean […]

Matthew Freeman | December 27, 2018

CPR’s 2018 Op-Eds

As we prepare to tie a bow on 2018, it’s worth looking back at the various op-eds CPR’s Member Scholars and staff penned over the course of the year. You can find and read every single one of them on our op-ed page. But here are some highlights for quick(er) perusal: In February, CPR’s Founding […]

Katie Tracy | December 26, 2018

2019 Wish List for Workers’ Health and Safety

As 2018 ends and we take stock of the developments in workers’ rights over the first half of the Trump administration, there is little forward progress to report. This administration, acting with minimal to no congressional oversight, has consistently neglected to protect America’s workers, instead rolling back and delaying numerous Obama-era regulations and safeguards, ignoring […]

James Goodwin | December 20, 2018

Top Ten Regulatory Policy Stories of 2018 (IMHO)

While regulatory policy developments might not lead evening news broadcasts or dominate newspaper headlines, they can have an enormous impact on our day-to-day lives. Regulatory policy has been a particular hotbed of activity during the Trump administration, which swept into office determined to undermine or corrupt the institutions responsible for keeping Americans and their environment […]

Maxine A Burkett | December 17, 2018

Planning for the Public Health Effects of Climate Migration

This post was co-authored by Kevin Morris, a J.D. candidate at the University of Hawaii at Manoa William S. Richardson School of Law. He serves as a research assistant for Maxine Burkett. This post was originally published by the Wilson Center's New Security Beat. In Alaska's arctic communities, Inuit contemplating the need to relocate have […]

James Goodwin | December 13, 2018

By Fixing Congress, the Planned H.R. 1 Could Strengthen Public Protections, Too

Not long after their party regained control of the lower chamber in the midterm elections, House Democratic leaders unveiled their signature legislative action for the next Congress – a package of reform measures aimed at tackling some of the worst ethics abuses involving the Trump administration's top officials and members of Congress. Symbolically assigned the […]