Join us.

We’re working to create a just society and preserve a healthy environment for future generations. Donate today to help.

Donate

New Report: How to Build a Regulatory System for a More Just and Equitable America

Last week's televised climate town hall saw several Democratic presidential candidates outline an impressive array of policies that, if implemented effectively, offer some measure of hope for averting the worst consequences of the climate crisis for us and future generations. The operative concept there – lurking in the background and too often taken for granted – is effective implementation. The fact of the matter is that meeting our country's greatest challenges – climate change, economic inequality, systemic racism, access to quality health care – will require effective implementation, and that in turn will require a more robust, modernized, and inclusive regulatory system than we currently have.

Conservatives have long vilified the U.S. system of regulatory safeguards, while establishment Democrats – when not trying to ignore it altogether – have at best accepted regulation only grudgingly and apologetically. As demonstrated at a June CPR conference, though, progressives are staking out a new, more enlightened position, one that recognizes regulation as not just a legitimate part of our democracy and economy, but also as essential to achieving their vision of a more just and equitable society.

That conference, Regulation as Social Justice: Empowering People Through Public Protections, represented a first-of-its-kind attempt at bringing together a diverse group of leading progressive advocates and academics to examine closely the role the regulatory system now plays in their work to promote justice and equity and to identify needed reforms to better advance this work. The conference's proceedings were built around two innovative variations on facilitator-led small group discussions, which we called "Idea Exchanges." During these sessions, the more than 60 participants in attendance shared their unique and experience-based insights on how the current regulatory system is failing marginalized members of our society, including the working poor and people of color, and how those failures can be fixed.

Today, CPR takes the next step, building upon the success of the gathering as we release Regulation as Social Justice: A Crowdsourced Blueprint for Building a Progressive Regulatory System. The report collects the perspectives and recommendations from the various small group discussions and synthesizes them into a comprehensive, action-oriented agenda for building a progressive regulatory system. The report sets the table for this agenda by providing a detailed assessment of how the regulatory system has become broken. In particular, progressive policy advocates identified four broad contributing factors: weak and outdated laws; unnecessary implementation barriers that agencies face; excessive corporate influence; and obstacles to meaningful public participation.

To address these failures, the Crowdsourced Blueprint outlines a series of reforms directed at Congress, federal regulatory agencies, the federal courts, and state governments. Broadly speaking, these reforms seek to change the regulatory system in two key ways. First, they try to reestablish the public as the locus of concern of policymaking, particularly with regard to the working poor, people of color, and other marginalized members of society. For example, these reforms call on policymakers to incorporate a place-based focus and attention to cumulative impacts in regulatory development, as well as to abandon decision-making tools and procedures such as cost-benefit analysis that systematically privilege the interests of corporate elites.

Second, many of the reforms are designed to empower ordinary Americans to shape how regulations are developed, implemented, and enforced. These reforms would not only provide new opportunities for meaningful public participation in the regulatory system; they would also curb or eliminate institutions like the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) that for too long have served to tilt the regulatory playing field in the favor of corporate special interests at the expense of public welfare. Among the public-empowering reforms included in the Crowdsourced Blueprint are calls for strengthening citizen regulatory enforcement tools and requiring agencies to establish teams of local engagement staff who would work with community leaders to obtain a comprehensive understanding of their regulatory programs' community-level impacts.

To increase the usefulness of the Crowdsourced Blueprint, CPR is also launching a web-based library of materials developed by progressive advocates that provides more details on the reforms included the report. We will continuously update this library as additional materials become available. We also invite you to contact us and suggest materials for inclusion. Our goal is to create a comprehensive online clearinghouse for information on reforms that would contribute to the development of a progressive regulatory system that advances the goals of social justice and equity.

The Crowdsourced Blueprint lays down a new marker in the broader debate over the proper role of the regulatory system. The reforms it contains confirm that the regulatory system, if properly constructed, will be essential to achieving the progressive vision of America that is committed to advancing the principles of social justice and equity. By protecting us all against a variety of health, safety, environmental, and consumer hazards, a progressive regulatory system would avert the kinds of harms that can amplify institutionalized injustice. Moreover, by providing greater and more meaningful public participation opportunities, a progressive regulatory system would shift more political power to ordinary Americans, breaking up the near-monopoly of political power that corporate special interests now enjoy in the regulatory space.

Much work remains to advance the progressive regulatory reform agenda, but early indicators suggest that this movement is beginning to build momentum. Just last week, Sen. Elizabeth Warren released her plan to tackle corruption in the federal government. It includes reforms to address "corporate capture of our federal agencies" and guarantee that citizens have meaningful access to the courts to pursue civil justice.

You can find the Crowdsourced Blueprint and supporting materials on CPR's website. You can also help us spread the word on Facebook and Twitter.

Showing 2,824 results

James Goodwin | September 23, 2019

New Report: How to Build a Regulatory System for a More Just and Equitable America

Last week's televised climate town hall saw several Democratic presidential candidates outline an impressive array of policies that, if implemented effectively, offer some measure of hope for averting the worst consequences of the climate crisis for us and future generations. The operative concept there – lurking in the background and too often taken for granted […]

Katie Tracy | September 19, 2019

On Strike for Climate Justice and Workers’ Rights

Tomorrow (September 20), I'm standing up for workers' rights by marching to the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., as part of the Global Climate Strike. I'll be walking in solidarity with the students and youth organizing the strike to spread the message that climate action is imperative.                  […]

David Hunter | September 18, 2019

The World Bank Considers Stepping Back from Accountability

For nearly two years, the World Bank Board of Directors has fumbled what should be an easy decision to modernize its Inspection Panel, the primary institution that addresses the damage the Bank's lending can do to local communities. At issue is whether the Panel should be able to monitor the Bank's implementation of Management Action […]

Joel A. Mintz | September 16, 2019

Abolition of Supplemental Environmental Projects: A Damaging Retreat for Environmental Enforcement

Late last month, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) quietly took a major step to undercut the enforcement of our federal pollution control laws. In a publicly released but little publicized memorandum, DOJ’s Associate Attorney General for Environment and Natural Resources, Jeffrey Bossert Clark, announced that the agency will no longer approve enforcement case settlements […]

Amy Sinden | September 16, 2019

Overshoot: Trump’s Deregulatory Zeal Goes Beyond Even Where Industry Asks Him to Go

Originally published in The Revelator. Reprinted under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 3.0. The Trump EPA last month proposed a new plan to remove oil and gas developers’ responsibility for detecting and fixing methane leaks in their wells, pipelines and storage operations. This proposal to axe the Obama-era methane rule is notable for two reasons. […]

Daniel Farber | September 16, 2019

A Welcome Victory in the D.C. Circuit

Originally published on Legal Planet. Last Friday, the D.C. Circuit decided Wisconsin v. EPA. The federal appeals court rejected industry attacks on a regulation dealing with interstate air pollution but accepted an argument by environmental groups that the regulation was too weak. Last week also featured depressing examples of the drumbeat of Trump administration rollbacks, […]

Daniel Farber | September 9, 2019

Trump’s Legal Challenges to the California Car Deal

Originally published on Legal Planet. Prompting rage by President Trump, California and several carmakers entered into a voluntary agreement on carbon emissions from new cars that blew past the administration's efforts to repeal existing federal requirements. Last week, the Trump administration slapped back at California. Although there's been a lot of editorializing about that response, […]

Daniel Farber | September 5, 2019

Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Next President

Originally published on Legal Planet. Under executive orders dating back to President Ronald Reagan, regulatory agencies like EPA are supposed to follow cost-benefit analysis when making decisions. Under the Trump administration, however, cost-benefit analysis has barely even served as window-dressing for its deregulatory actions. It has launched a series of efforts to prevent full counting […]

David Flores | September 5, 2019

Hurricane Dorian May Brush Virginia, Bringing Danger of Toxic Floodwaters

In August, Virginians remembered the devastation wrought by Hurricane Camille 50 years earlier. After making landfall on the Gulf Coast, that storm dumped dozens of inches of rain in western portions of the Commonwealth and killed more than 150 people in flash floods and landslides. Today, Virginians along the Atlantic coast and in the Hampton […]