It's no secret that President Trump has harassed staff at federal agencies since his first moment in office. Days after his inauguration, he blocked scientists at the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) from talking to the press and the public. He famously cracked down on federal labor unions and chiseled early retirees of their expected pension benefits. Now he's requiring hundreds of staff from USDA's Economic Research Service and the Bureau of Land Management to leave their homes in the Washington area and move to offices out West or risk losing their jobs.
The administration has been particularly disdainful of the professional staff at the EPA – the people who work every day to make sure you can take a dip in the lake, fill your lungs on a morning walk, or drink from the tap without some nagging fear of toxic contamination. Environmental science was one of the first targets of Team Trump, as the gag rule noted above illustrates, and the administration has continued its broadside on science at the EPA in other ways, too. According to a recent exposé in the New York Times, "In addition to shutting down some programs, there have been notable instances where the administration has challenged established scientific research."
The trouble goes beyond the lab. Last June, Trump's EPA bosses surprised everyone by cutting off contract negotiations with the staff's union, the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE). The leadership team instead imposed its own unilateral agreement, which was decidedly stacked against everyday workers, limiting telecommuting, slashing onsite union representation, and hobbling the worker-grievance process.
But this time, EPA's staff clapped back.
With the support of AFGE, EPA workers pressured Trump's team back to the bargaining table. And in conjunction with renewed talks, they have just launched a "Protect EPA" campaign that includes an "EPA Workers' Bill of Rights." The bill of rights, according to the union's press release, is "designed to embrace science, bolster working conditions, and deliver a fair contract for the nearly 8,000 EPA workers represented by AFGE."
The bill of rights includes 10 provisions:
The staff at the EPA are some of the most resourceful, dedicated, and caring people you will ever meet. We know that because our advocacy at CPR brings us in regular contact with agency officials of all kinds. One of us (Rob) was lucky enough to work with them as a political appointee at the EPA during the Obama administration. At every meeting, it seemed like everyone was the smartest person in the room. "We are scientists, we are public information officers, we are enforcement personnel," agency members write in the bill's preamble. Yes, and school volunteers, and softball coaches, and local choir members, and doting grandparents, too. The people at the EPA have had our backs for nearly 50 years. It's time for us to return the favor.
To join EPA in its fight to protect the environment and public health, you can sign the Workers' Bill of Rights petition here.
Top photo by the Natural Resources Defense Council, used under a Creative Commons license.
Showing 2,829 results
Katie Tracy, Robert Verchick | January 22, 2020
It's no secret that President Trump has harassed staff at federal agencies since his first moment in office. Days after his inauguration, he blocked scientists at the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) from talking to the press and the public. He famously cracked down on federal labor unions and chiseled early retirees of their expected pension benefits. Now he's requiring hundreds of staff from USDA's Economic Research Service and the Bureau of Land Management to leave their homes in the Washington area and move to offices out West or risk losing their jobs.
Alejandro Camacho, Robert L. Glicksman | January 21, 2020
The Trump administration has fired the latest salvo in its never-ending assault on environmental safeguards: a proposal from the White House Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) to overhaul its regulations governing federal agency compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).
Victor Flatt | January 15, 2020
It's not just wildfires in Australia or our rapidly warming oceans (to the tune of five Hiroshima bombs every second). Climate change affects every aspect of our world, and it's forcing us reevaluate all of the human institutions we've built up over years, decades, and centuries. One such institution that CPR Member Scholar Victor Flatt has begun investigating is the legal profession itself.
Daniel Farber | January 13, 2020
Last week's NEPA proposal bars agencies from considering many of the harms their actions will produce, such as climate change. These restrictions profoundly misunderstand the nature of environmental problems and are based on the flimsiest of legal foundations.
Daniel Farber | January 10, 2020
The White House just released its proposed revisions to the rules about environmental impact statements. The White House Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) simply does not have the kind of power that it is trying to arrogate to itself. Its proposal is marked by hubris about the government's ability to control how the courts apply the law.
Daniel Farber | January 6, 2020
Australia is remarkably exposed to climate change and remarkably unwilling to do much about it. Conditions keep getting worse. Yet climate policy in Australia has been treading water or backpedaling for years.
James Goodwin | December 30, 2019
Here, in no particular order, are ten stories I will be following over the next year that could determine whether we will still have a regulatory system that is strong enough to promote fairness and accountability by preventing corporations from shifting the harmful effects of their activities onto innocent members of the public:
Daniel Farber | December 23, 2019
Like many humans, the Twenty-First Century’s teenage years were stormy.
James Goodwin | December 20, 2019
For many of us, the best way to characterize the past year in three words would be “too much news.” That sentiment certainly applies to the wonky backwater of the regulatory policy world. Today, that world looks much different than it did even just a year ago, and with still more rapid changes afoot, the cloud of uncertainty that now looms ominously over it doesn’t appear to be dissipating anytime soon. Here, in no particular order, are 10 of the biggest developments from the past year that have contributed to this disquieting state of affairs.