Join us.

We’re working to create a just society and preserve a healthy environment for future generations. Donate today to help.

Donate

Workers Memorial Day 2020

Tomorrow, April 28, is Workers' Memorial Day, a day the labor movement established to mourn workers killed on the job and to renew the fight for the living. This year, as the coronavirus pandemic grinds on, taking its toll on workers and their families, we’re reminded more than ever of how critical it is to guarantee all workers the right to a safe and healthy workplace.

Even before COVID-19, a typical day in the United States saw 14 workers killed on the job – hardworking people who set out for work, never to return home. In 2018, 5,250 workers – one worker every 100 minutes – died on the job. Black and Latinx workers were hit hardest in 2018, with a 16 percent increase from 2017 in black worker deaths and a 6 percent increase in Latinx worker deaths. As in years past, tens of thousands of additional workers died from chronic illnesses such as mesothelioma, asbestos, and silicosis, caused by on-the-job exposure to toxic substances. Millions more workers suffered on-the-job injuries.

Year

Total Deaths

White

Black

Latinx

Other

2018

5,250

3,405

615

961

269

2017

5,147

3,449

530

903

265

2016

5,190

3,481

587

879

243

2015

4,836

3,241

495

903

197

2014

4,821

3,332

475

804

210

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries

Tragically, over the past five years, we’ve begun to see a rise in worker deaths. Although we won’t have data on worker deaths during 2020 until late 2021, it’s probable the death toll will be higher as a result of COVID-19, even though many individuals are out of work or working from home. Yet we can also predict COVID-19 deaths will be undercounted because OSHA’s recent coronavirus guidance excuses employers from recording COVID-19 cases among employees, thus guaranteeing underreporting of work-related illnesses and deaths that result.

Fifty years ago, on December 29, 1970, President Richard Nixon signed the Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Act into law, with the purpose of ensuring every worker in the United States “safe and healthful working conditions.” Since that time, the annual number of on-the-job deaths has declined drastically. Yet with thousands still dying at work each year, there is much more lawmakers, OSHA, and employers can do.

Every worker deserves to return home from a shift without illness or injury. Yet President Trump and the Department of Labor have done little to protect workers, and the current Congress has passed no meaningful legislation to address workplace safety problems. According to the AFL-CIO’s 2019 Death on the Job Report, in 2018, federal OSHA and its state counterparts employed 1,815 inspectors to cover 9.8 million establishments, the fewest inspectors since the 1970s. This equates to one inspector for every 79,262 workers. As a result, federal OSHA can inspect each workplace only once every 165 years, and the agency's state counterparts can inspect each workplace every 108 years. While the federal government spends billions on tax breaks and subsidies to major corporations, OSHA spends a mere $3.69 on each worker’s safety, the AFL-CIO reports.

Amid the pandemic, Trump’s OSHA has made clear it plans to do even less to protect workers, actively undermining worker health and safety by neglecting its responsibility, including by letting employers police themselves. While nurses, doctors, bus drivers, bank tellers, janitors, grocery store employees, postal service workers, farmworkers, and other essential workers risk their lives for the rest of the nation, the Trump administration and leadership at the Department of Labor have taken no action to ensure they’re provided with basic protections like gloves and masks. Instead of leading in this time of crisis, they're backing away from their legal and moral obligations. In so doing, they’ve made clear that they view these workers as expendable, people whose well-being matters only so far as it affects the profits of business owners.

The current crisis is an important reminder that every worker has a right to a healthy and safe workplace. Tomorrow, on Workers Memorial Day, we mourn the loss of friends, family, and neighbors who have died while trying to put food on the table and shelter over their heads.

You can join the remembrance. Find an event here and join communities across the country in an online candle light vigil or memorial.

After we remember all those we’ve lost, we must renew our fight for the living. That fight can begin with some obvious reforms to improve working conditions, many of which I’ve proposed for the past several years. Although none of these ideas has yet to be adopted, I’m proposing them once again, along with a few new reforms in light of COVID-19.

Congress, President Trump, and the Department of Labor should make the following improvements:

Showing 2,818 results

Katie Tracy | April 27, 2020

Workers Memorial Day 2020

Tomorrow, April 28, is Workers' Memorial Day, a day the labor movement established to mourn workers killed on the job and to renew the fight for the living. This year, as the coronavirus pandemic grinds on, taking its toll on workers and their families, we’re reminded more than ever of how critical it is to guarantee all workers the right to a safe and healthy workplace. Even before COVID-19, a typical day in the United States saw 14 workers killed on the job – hardworking people who set out for work, never to return home. In 2018, 5,250 workers – one worker every 100 minutes – died on the job. Black and Latinx workers were hit hardest in 2018, with a 16 percent increase from 2017 in black worker deaths and a 6 percent increase in Latinx worker deaths.

Lisa Heinzerling | April 24, 2020

Opinion analysis: The justices’ purpose-full reading of the Clean Water Act

On April 23, 2020, the Supreme Court ruled, 6-3, that the Clean Water Act requires a permit when a point source of pollution adds pollutants to navigable waters through groundwater, if this addition of pollutants is "the functional equivalent of a direct discharge" from the source into navigable waters. Perhaps the most striking feature of Justice Stephen Breyer's opinion for the majority is its interpretive method. The opinion reads like something from a long-ago period of statutory interpretation, before statutory decisions regularly made the central meaning of complex laws turn on a single word or two and banished legislative purpose to the interpretive fringes.

Darya Minovi | April 23, 2020

New Report Finds Poultry Industry Contributes 24 Million Pounds of Nitrogen to Chesapeake Bay

On Earth Day, the Environmental Integrity Project (EIP), a CPR ally, released a new report on nitrogen pollution from poultry operations in the Chesapeake Bay watershed. Using data from the Chesapeake Bay Program’s pollution modeling program, EIP found that approximately 24 million pounds of nitrogen pollution from the poultry industry entered the Chesapeake Bay’s tidal waters in 2018. That's more than from urban and suburban stormwater runoff in Maryland and Virginia combined, and it can contaminate drinking water sources of nearby communities and feed huge algal blooms in the Bay that block sunlight, choking off fish and plant life.

Brian Gumm | April 21, 2020

CPR’s Verchick Notes Weakening Environmental Enforcement during Pandemic Endangers Fenceline Communities

On April 17, CPR Board President Rob Verchick joined EPA enforcement chief Susan Bodine and other panelists for an American Bar Association webinar on environmental protections and enforcement during the COVID-19 pandemic. During the event, Bodine expressed "surprise" that the agency's pandemic enforcement policy was so roundly criticized, but she shouldn't have been caught off guard by those critiques. As Verchick noted during the discussion, "The problem with [weakening monitoring and pollution reporting requirements] is that fenceline communities have no idea where to look. They have no idea if the facilities in their backyards are…taking a holiday from pollution requirements or not."

Michael C. Duff | April 21, 2020

COVID-19: Legal Issues When Workers’ Compensation Doesn’t Apply

With COVID-19 cases contracted at work on the rise, labor and employment attorneys, businesses, advocates, and workers are all wondering if their state’s workers’ compensation law will apply, and alternatively, if an ill worker could file a lawsuit against their employer. The answers to these questions are not simple, as workers’ compensation laws vary by state, and when it comes to occupational diseases, the applicability of workers’ comp is often even more complicated. In a recent post on Workers’ Compensation Law Prof Blog, CPR Member Scholar Michael Duff discusses the so-called workers’ compensation “grand bargain,” under which workers receive no-fault benefits for work-related injuries and illnesses in exchange for giving up their right to file a lawsuit against their employer. In his post, Duff explores the circumstances in which a worker who has contracted COVID-19 at work may still have the right to file a lawsuit (getting around the “exclusivity bar”), as illustrated by a recently filed wrongful death case in Illinois, Evans v. Walmart. In this case, plaintiffs argue that two Walmart employees, Wando Evans and Phillip Thomas, passed away due to complications from COVID-19 contracted while working for the big box retailer.

Katie Tracy | April 20, 2020

Where Is OSHA?

As the coronavirus pandemic wears on, reports abound of essential frontline workers laboring without such basic protective gear as masks, gloves, soap, or water; with improper distancing between workstations and coworkers; and in workplaces alongside infected colleagues. So far, nearly 4,000 workers have filed complaints with the federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), raising concerns about health and safety conditions inside the workplace. Yet the agency has been largely absent at a time it is most needed. Shamefully, as COVID-19 illnesses rise in slaughterhouses, grocery stores, hospitals, and other worksites across the nation, the agency has chosen to go against its very mission of protecting America’s workers, ignoring calls to adopt emergency standards and rolling back its enforcement efforts.

Matthew Freeman | April 17, 2020

Goodwin: Censored Science Rule Lacks Legal Basis

On April 14, CPR's James Goodwin took part in a virtual hearing, hosted by the Union of Concerned Scientists, on the EPA's "censored science" rule, an effort by EPA to exclude from its rulemaking process a range of scientific studies that industry finds uncongenial to its anti-regulatory views. In his testimony, Goodwin dismantles EPA's contention that the rule is grounded in law, observing that there are no credible legal underpinnings for the proposal.

Daniel Farber | April 17, 2020

We Need an Environmental Dr. Fauci

During the coronavirus crisis, Dr. Anthony Fauci has become the voice of reason. Much of the public turns to him for critical information about public health while even President Trump finds it necessary to listen. In the Trump era, no one plays that role in the environmental arena. The result is a mindless campaign of deregulation that imperils public health and safety. We can't clone Dr. Fauci or duplicate the unique circumstances that have made his voice so powerful. However, we can do several things that would make it harder for administrations to ignore science.

Darya Minovi | April 16, 2020

Coming Soon: CPR Webinar on Vulnerability and Resilience to COVID-19 and the Climate Crisis

On April 29, the Center for Progressive Reform (CPR) will host a webinar to discuss the public health and policy implications of COVID-19 and to highlight the many policy parallels between the pandemic and climate change. Speakers include Daniel Farber, JD, of UC Berkeley (and a CPR Member Scholar); Monica Schoch-Spana, PhD, of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health; and Aaron Bernstein, MD, MPH, of Boston Children’s Hospital and the Harvard Medical School. Join us!