Join us.

We’re working to create a just society and preserve a healthy environment for future generations. Donate today to help.

Donate

Restoring Agency Norms

This post was originally published on Legal Planet. Reprinted with permission.

Donald Trump prided himself on his contempt for established norms of presidential action. Whole books have been written about how to restore those norms. Something similar also happened deeper down in the government, out in the agencies like the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) that do the actual work of governance. Trump appointees have corrupted agencies and trashed the norms that support agency integrity. It will take hard work to undo the harm. White House leadership is important, but success will require dedicated effort by the agency heads appointed by Biden.

Scientific integrity. The role of science is the most obvious example of norm busting under Trump. Whether it is EPA, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), or the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the Trump administration shoved aside mainstream scientists in favor of ideologues and fringe figures. Agencies need to adopt stringent scientific integrity standards and ensure that good science won't be squelched in favor of political expediency.

Ethics rules. Much stricter ethics standards are also necessary. The Trump administration was notorious for conflicts of interest, as it staffed agency positions with industry lobbyists and lawyers. Never again should an industry lobbyist be appointed to supervise that industry. Congress could help codify some of the conflict of interest rules. Short of that, the rules should be incorporated into agency regulations rather than merely remaining guidelines.

Transparency. Agency transparency was another victim of the Trump years. Political appointees were inserted into the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) process to prevent disclosure of anything that might embarrass the administration. We need to restore control of disclosure to nonpolitical professionals. Also in terms of public information, websites need to be restored so that information on climate science and other topics disfavored by Trump will once again be available to the public. And agency press officers need to step back from attacks on press coverage and focus on communicating the agency's activities to the public.

Agency independence. Not only has power migrated from professionals to political appointees within agencies, it has also migrated upward from small agencies to larger departments. It was once an extraordinary event for the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) to overrule FDA. During the COVID outbreak, that seems to have been a frequent occurrence under the Trump administration. That may be legal, but it's not good practice. FDA's political independence and professional integrity are important to its effectiveness, and the same is true of other such agencies.

Non-politicized enforcement. Enforcement is another area where the Trump administration went beyond its predecessors. Enforcement efforts virtually collapsed in some agencies such as the EPA, and what enforcement remained was subject to political interference. That politicization was most obvious in the Justice Department, where career prosecutors were shunted aside by Bill Barr in order to pursue Trump's opponents and reward his friends. Agency heads must make it clear that the law actually will be enforced and will be enforced without fear or favor. In the environmental area, citizen suits are an important backup. Congress could assist by reducing some of the procedural barriers that can make those suits more difficult to bring.

Financial probity. Finally, there are financial issues. The Trump administration has played fast and loose with appropriations, stretching legal authority to reallocate funding to its limits and often beyond. Personal travel by appointees, legally dubious new programs, and sweetheart contracts with political or personal allies — all of these have happened over and over. Congress needs to use its oversight powers, including investigations by the Government Accountability Office (GAO), much more vigorously. We ought to require regular audits for government agencies, just like businesses have to undergo.

The approach of the Trump administration was simple: politicize every possible government decision. That wasn't just the approach of the White House. It was enthusiastically carried out within agencies themselves. We need to restore basic principles of good government, lest politicized agency enforcement, science, and accounting start to seem like business as usual.

Top photo by the Natural Resources Defense Council, used under a Creative Commons license.

Showing 2,823 results

Daniel Farber | December 15, 2020

Restoring Agency Norms

Donald Trump prided himself on his contempt for established norms of presidential action. Whole books have been written about how to restore those norms. Something similar also happened deeper down in the government, out in the agencies like the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) that do the actual work of governance. Trump appointees have corrupted agencies and trashed the norms that support agency integrity. It will take hard work to undo the harm. White House leadership is important, but success will require dedicated effort by the agency heads appointed by Biden.

Scott Stern | December 14, 2020

A New Strategy for Indigenous Climate Refugees

In the midst of a global pandemic and increasingly desperate attempts by the Trump administration to subvert the results of the 2020 election, it would be easy to miss a slew of recent news stories on individuals the media has termed "climate refugees." These are people who have been displaced due to catastrophic climate change, or who will be forced to flee as their homes become too hot, too cold, or too dry, or if they become regular targets of massive storms or end up underwater. As many of these stories have highlighted, among those most at risk are the Indigenous peoples of the United States. Yet, there is a potential path out of climate-induced devastation.

Daniel Farber | December 11, 2020

Downstream Emissions

A recent Ninth Circuit ruling overturned approval of offshore drilling in the Arctic. The ruling may directly impact the Trump administration's plans for oil leasing in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR). By requiring agencies to consider emissions when fossil fuels are ultimately burned, the Court of Appeals' decision may also change the way agencies consider other fossil fuel projects, such as gas pipelines.

Katlyn Schmitt | December 10, 2020

Environmental Enforcement in the COVID-19 Era

Ever since the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a dangerous (and now-rescinded) policy relaxing enforcement of environmental protections in March, the Center for Progressive Reform has watchdogged responses from state environmental agencies in three states in the Chesapeake Bay Region — Maryland, Virginia, and Pennsylvania. While the EPA essentially gave companies a free pass to hide pollution violations during the pandemic, most states set up processes to handle COVID-19-related noncompliance. Environmental agencies in the three states we monitored received dozens of waiver requests related to water, land, and air quality protections, pollution controls, sampling and monitoring, inspections, and critical infrastructure deadlines. A majority of these requests were related to the pandemic. But others, such as those seeking to delay important deadlines for construction projects, were not. This suggests that some polluters are using COVID-19 as an excuse to subvert or delay deadlines that prevent further air or water pollution.

Darya Minovi, Rebecca Bratspies | December 9, 2020

Will the Biden Administration Invest in Environmental Justice Reforms?

On October 22, millions of Americans watched the final presidential debate, taking in each candidate's plan for oft-discussed issues like health care, the economy, and foreign policy. Toward the end, the moderator asked the candidates how they would address the disproportionate and harmful impacts of the oil and chemical industries on people of color. President Trump largely ignored the question. But former Vice President Joe Biden addressed it head on, sharing his own experience growing up near oil refineries and calling for restrictions on "fenceline emissions" -- the pollution levels observed at the boundary of a facility's property, which too often abuts a residential neighborhood. Less than three weeks later, Biden was elected president of the United States, making it possible for him to turn his campaign promises into action.

Laurie Ristino | December 8, 2020

Democracy Is Fragile. Help Us Protect It.

At long last, we’ve reached “safe harbor” day, when states must resolve election-related disputes. Under federal law, Congress must count votes from states that meet today’s deadline. Donald Trump is essentially out of time to steal a second term; our democracy, it appears, will survive, at least for now. The last four years have been an urgent call to action to reclaim our democracy, to fix it, to reimagine it. The good news is we can use the tools of democracy to do so. The Center for Progressive Reform is launching Policy for a Just America, a major new initiative to repair and reimagine government. We’re developing a series of policy recommendations and other resources to advance justice and equity and create a sustainable future. We’re also using advocacy and media engagement tools to inform the public about the urgent need for reform and how to achieve it across all levels of government.

William Funk | December 7, 2020

HHS Proposes to Sunset Regulations It Fails to Review Retrospectively

Everyone who has studied what agencies in fact have done have concluded that agencies have largely failed in complying with varying retrospective review requirements. What is to be done? The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has a proposed answer: absent a retrospective review within a designated period, sunset the regulation.

Daniel Farber | November 20, 2020

‘Whole of Government’ Climate Policy

It's clear that EPA has a central role to play in climate policy, but EPA does not stand alone. Other agencies also have important roles to play. Fortunately, the Biden transition team seems to have come to this realization.

Amy Sinden, James Goodwin | November 18, 2020

We Need to Uproot Roadblocks to Just, Equitable Safeguards. Here Are 10 Things the Biden-Harris Team Can Do to Make that Happen

After taking their oaths of office in January, newly minted President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris will face a number of daunting challenges: the ongoing pandemic and economic downturn; structural racial and ethnic injustice; widening economic inequality; inadequate access to affordable health care; and climate change. And Congress, facing the prospect of divided control, is unlikely to respond with robust legislative solutions that the American people expect and deserve. The good news is that Biden and Harris will be able to meet these challenges head on by revitalizing governance and making effective use of the federal regulatory system. Better still, they can do so in a way that delivers justice and equity for all Americans.