“Well behaved women seldom make history.”
This well-worn adage is no doubt true, but so too is its opposite. History is written for a purpose and, all too often, that purpose is to justify the status quo as a historical inevitability. Those women and men who defy the expectations of their time, who fight too often and too well against the injustices of the day, are mysteriously forgotten by those who write our history. In this way, women’s contributions to and leadership of the organized labor movement, though lionized within the movement itself, have largely escaped public consciousness.
Indeed, women led the battle for industrial democracy — even before they won the right to vote.
Perhaps the best known labor leader is Mother Jones. Born Mary Harris, Jones was an Irish immigrant who lost her husband and all four of her children to yellow fever and didn’t begin her advocacy until her 50s.
But as the Industrial Revolution took hold, as wages fell to subsistence levels, and men, women, and children worked long hours in dangerous conditions she began organizing — and continued to do so well into her 90s. She traveled up and down the country, persuading miners and millworkers to join unions. She was repeatedly jailed, including in 1912 by a military tribunal in West Virginia. During a 1903 strike that prompted a violent crackdown, she was woken in the middle of the night, driven out of Colorado, and ordered never to return. She was back in Denver the next day.
Jones also leveraged her status as a public figure to raise awareness about harm to working people. In 1903, she led a children’s march from Pennsylvania to New York, educating people along the way about children’s horrible working conditions and shaming those who benefited from child labor with images of maimed and sickly children. She raised national alarm about Colorado’s Ludlow Massacre of 1914, when the National Guard opened fire on striking workers and their families, killing 22 people, including 11 children. She also cofounded the International Workers of the World (IWW), a powerful union in the early 1900s that won many of the labor movement's earliest victories.
Elizabeth Gurley Flynn also played a leading role in the IWW in the early part of the century. Like Mother Jones, she traveled the country, organizing workers and advocating for free speech, and was also repeatedly jailed for her efforts. At a 1909 rally in Missoula, Montana, the authorities threatened to arrest those making “radical” speeches. Flynn helped organize so many IWW speakers that town jails quickly filled up, and officials were forced to release the advocates and end the speech ban.
A few years later, Flynn helped organize textile workers in Lawrence, Massachusetts, who, like many other industrial workers of the day, lived and worked in brutal conditions. Most were immigrants, half were women and children, and the average life expectancy was just 39. In 1912, Massachusetts passed a law shortening the workweek from 56 hours to 54 hours; in response, Lawrence mill owners reduced wages.
With Flynn’s help, workers struck for better pay. Women played a large part in the strike, marching in daily picket lines and parades, holding the line in the face of hunger and violence. Flynn helped educate the workers and raise money for the strike fund, and organized a successful effort to send the striking workers’ children to sympathetic families across the East Coast. Hundreds of children made the journey to safe and welcoming homes away from the conflict. Local police tried to stop this practice — and even beat and jailed women and children in an attempt to keep them off the trains. But the campaign worked. In the end, tens of thousands of workers won substantial pay increases and better working conditions.
In 1920, Flynn helped found the American Civil Liberties Union along with Helen Keller, another celebrated labor advocate. Though later kicked out of the ACLU because of her affiliations with the Communist Party, Flynn continued fighting for civil liberties until her death.
These are but a few stories about women’s leadership of the labor movement; though rarely told, we’re lucky to know them. Throughout our history, hundreds of thousands of women have marched in picket lines and brought towns and industries to their knees — stories worth remembering and sharing this month and every month.
Banner image: Women march in support of coal miners on strike and in support of Mother Jones in Las Animas County, Colorado, carrying a United States flag and signs: "God Bless Mother Jones" and "Ladies Assembly of Southern Colorado." 1913. Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.
Showing 2,837 results
Ian Campbell | March 28, 2022
Women led the battle for industrial democracy — even before they won the vote. However, women’s contributions to and leadership of the organized labor movement, though lionized within the movement itself, have largely escaped public consciousness.
Marcha Chaudry | March 24, 2022
Women’s History Month isn’t just a time to recognize achievements made throughout the decades to advance women’s rights and demand equity. It’s also an opportunity to celebrate women making history today, the ones in our unwritten history books.
Daniel Farber | March 22, 2022
In describing cost-benefit analysis to students, I've often told them that the "cost" side of the equation is pretty simple. And it does seem simple: just get some engineers to figure out how industry can comply and run some spreadsheets of the costs. But this seemingly simple calculation turns out to be riddled with uncertainties, particularly when you're talking about regulating the energy industry. Those uncertainties need more attention in designing regulations.
Alexandra Klass, Hannah Wiseman | March 21, 2022
The U.S. system for regulating electricity divides responsibility among too many players, assigns too many overlapping or competing tasks, and creates too many distorted incentives, a group of law professors says. They propose reforms that would break down governance silos to ensure greater collaboration in the clean energy transition.
Catalina Gonzalez | March 16, 2022
State officials in California are leading an extensive multisector planning effort to develop the 2022 Scoping Plan, the third update to California’s climate mitigation strategy. The new plan will outline a pathway for statewide action toward reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 40% by 2030 and reaching net-zero emissions no later than 2045.
Daniel Farber | March 15, 2022
On March 11, there were two seismic shocks in the world of gas pipeline regulation. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has spent years resisting pressure to change the way it licenses new gas pipelines. The whole point of a natural gas pipeline is to deliver the gas to users who will burn it, thereby releasing carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. FERC has steadfastly refused to take those emissions into account. The D.C. Circuit held that position illegal in an opinion released last Friday. That same day, by coincidence, FERC published guidelines in the Federal Register explaining how it proposed to consider those emissions.
Sidney A. Shapiro | March 14, 2022
When it comes to historically marginalized groups, an “out of sight and out of mind” approach has too often infected agency policymaking. Agencies have responded with outreach to marginalized communities, but regulatory policymaking is hardly inclusive. Last January, President Biden required the government to increase engagement “with community-based organizations and civil rights organizations,” and the Administrative Conference of the United States responded with a multiday forum on underserved communities and the regulatory process. Addressing the lack of participation by marginalized communities in regulatory decision-making is crucial, but there is another fundamental issue. The input of marginalized communities will not matter if agencies ignore or devalue it because these insights are not expressed using the standard narratives of policymaking.
Allison Stevens | March 9, 2022
Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, recently nominated to succeed retiring Justice Stephen Breyer, has received the endorsement of over 200 Black law deans and professors.
David Driesen | March 8, 2022
Arguments and judicial reasoning in administrative law cases usually focus on the case at hand. Indeed, the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) commands that narrow focus. The APA does not give the courts any role in shaping the laws governing administrative agencies, for that is what Congress does. Instead, it gives the courts a modest, albeit difficult responsibility: They may determine whether a particular agency action is arbitrary and capricious or contrary to law. Therefore, parties challenging an agency rule they disapprove of generally argue that the agency has violated some restraint stated in the statute or exercised its discretion in an arbitrary way. But in the U.S. Supreme Court case heard last week about the scope of EPA's authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions (West Virginia v. EPA), coal companies relied heavily on a "parade of horribles" argument — a listing of bad things that might happen in future cases if the Court upheld EPA's interpretation of the Clean Air Act in the case before the Court.