Join us.

We’re working to create a just society and preserve a healthy environment for future generations. Donate today to help.

Donate

The Poop on Manure in the Water: We’re Sick of It

Today’s New York Times article about excess manure in the water is a stark reminder of what can happen when an environmental problem isn’t addressed: people get really sick.

While the article is shocking -- it describes how families in Wisconsin living close to dairy farms suffered from chronic diarrhea, stomach problems, and severe ear infections from parasites and bacteria that seeped into the drinking water -- it restates what a lot of people have known for a long time. We are failing to protect people from agricultural runoff because the Clean Water Act does not address it adequately, as Bill Andreen discussed just this week.

Meanwhile, in the case of Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs), which are covered by the Clean Water Act, EPA has looked away for years. The problem is acute enough that the Government Accountability Office took EPA to task for sticking its head in the sand. A 2008 GAO report found that “no federal agency collects accurate and consistent data on the number, size, and location of CAFOs,” in spite of the fact that “large farms can produce more raw waste than the human population of a large city.”

And it’s not just the folks who live in rural areas next to farms who are threatened with illness. Last week, Charles W. Schmidt wrote an extensive article in Environmental Health Perspectives about the connection between swine flu and concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs). The article is a comprehensive look at a troubling aspect of the swine flu outbreak, namely, that big pig farms are a potential source of the virus.

Tellingly, the article describes how CAFO workers are 50 times more likely to have H1N1 antibodies than the non-exposed. Spouses of CAFO workers are 25 times more likely to have these antibodies, showing how easily the virus jumps from CAFO workers to the general population. And as Tom Philpott pointed out in Grist in April, Smithfield Foods, the world’s largest pork producer, operates a giant CAFO five miles from where the swine flu outbreak first originated in Perote, Mexico.

Finally, CAFOs affect human health in other ways, too. The hormones and pharmaceuticals used at CAFOs -- in large part because the places are so unsanitary that the animals are easily sickened – are also getting into our water. Just this week the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) released the largest and most comprehensive study to date about how widespread intersex fish are across the United States. Scientists found intersex fish – fish with both male and female characteristics – in about a third of all the sites they examined. Hormones are one likely cause. The Pee Dee River at Bucksport, S.C., boasted the highest percentage of intersex largemouth bass – a whopping 91%.

It’s more than past time for Congress, EPA and the states to get serious about getting the poop out of our water. It’s no secret where it’s coming from, and people are sick of – and sick from – inaction. Regulating factory farms and agricultural runoff would be a good place for our policymakers to start.

Showing 2,824 results

Shana Campbell Jones | September 18, 2009

The Poop on Manure in the Water: We’re Sick of It

Today’s New York Times article about excess manure in the water is a stark reminder of what can happen when an environmental problem isn’t addressed: people get really sick. While the article is shocking — it describes how families in Wisconsin living close to dairy farms suffered from chronic diarrhea, stomach problems, and severe ear […]

Alejandro Camacho | September 18, 2009

Interior’s Initiative on Adaptation Will Need to Overcome a Legacy of Inaction

Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar signed a secretarial order on Monday establishing a new department-wide strategy for gathering data and developing management options to help managers cope with the effects of climate change on resources governed by the Interior Department. The order seeks to initiate three components: A “Climate Change Response Council” to coordinate […]

David Driesen | September 17, 2009

Administrative Delay in Implementing a Cap-and-Trade Program: A Compelling Reason to Auction All Allowances

Cap-and-trade legislation making its way through Congress has become enormously complex, embodying a host of arcane political deals governing the distribution of the vast majority of emissions allowances being given away for free, with crucial details being left to EPA. This complexity threatens to hinder the effort to address climate disruption (see my article Capping […]

Daniel Farber | September 16, 2009

It’s Déjà Vu All Over Again

Cross-posted from Legal Planet. Since opponents can’t seem to come up with any new arguments against climate change legislation, they seem determined to recycle the old, discredited ones. Here’s Tuesday’s example, straight from the GOP press release: Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner, R-Wis., and Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif, today urged the Environmental Protection Agency to include several […]

William Andreen | September 16, 2009

One More Point on the N.Y. Times Water Article — the Problem of Nonpoint Source Pollution

Sunday’s New York Times article about the neglect of our clean water laws included a shocking example of how a regulatory gap in the Clean Water Act can harm public health. For example, the article referred to water supplies in parts of the Farm Belt that are contaminated by dangerous levels of pesticides, which originate […]

William Andreen | September 15, 2009

N.Y. Times Article on Water Pollution: A Timely Reminder of the Role of Enforcement

Sunday’s New York Times article about the neglect of our clean water laws came as a timely reminder that, no matter how well articulated our environmental laws may be, it takes consistent, vigorous enforcement to ensure compliance with these statutory regimes. Unfortunately, as the article illustrates, state and federal enforcement of the Clean Water Act […]

Matt Shudtz | September 14, 2009

New Research on Radioactive Granite, and OSHA’s Response

Granite, like most natural stones, contains radioactive material. While this isn’t much of a concern for a person who spends a few hours in a kitchen with granite countertops every day, new research by David Bernhardt, Linda Kincaid, and Al Gerhart suggests that the workers who fabricate those countertops might have reason to worry. When […]

Kirsten Engel | September 11, 2009

States Go to Bat for Improving Climate Change Legislation

Five State Attorneys General sent a letter to the Senate leadership on August 31st urging the Senate to enact strong climate legislation. The AGs letter is unusual in that states directly lobbying Congress on the details of federal legislation is a fairly infrequent phenomenon in and of itself. The AGs from California, Arizona, Connecticut, Delaware, […]

Holly Doremus | September 11, 2009

Mountaintop Removal Update: EPA May Grow a Spine

This item cross-posted by permission from Legal Planet. EPA today announced that it would review 79 pending applications for Clean Water Act section 404 permits for surface coal mining projects in Appalachia (hat tip: Coal Tattoo). This review is good news, and an indication that EPA may be developing a backbone with respect to the […]