Join us.

We’re working to create a just society and preserve a healthy environment for future generations. Donate today to help.

Donate

Member Scholars Take Center Stage in Prestigious Environmental Law Anthology

I’m thrilled to share that the Center for Progressive Reform features prominently in the pages of a forthcoming anthology of last year’s best writing on environmental law.

Three of five articles selected for inclusion in the 2022 edition of the anthology were written or co-written by our esteemed Member Scholars — law professors who generously donate their time and expertise to help us achieve our mission to create a more responsive and inclusive government, a healthier environment, and a just society. A fourth article was authored by a Member Scholar who is on leave from the center while serving in the Biden administration.

The competition was fierce. Every year, leading environmental law professors and practitioners review hundreds of articles in the previous year’s law review literature — on topics ranging from land use and development to energy and natural resources — and select the best of the bunch. The top articles are then published in Land Use and Environment Law Review, Thomson Reuters’ prestigious collection of “the most insightful thinking” on the topic.

For the 2022 edition, more than 30 experts in environmental law identified 14 of the nation’s best articles, and 15 second-level reviewers then selected the top five for publication.

“Representation in this prestigious publication is a tremendous honor,” Rob Verchick, the president of our Board and a law professor at Loyola University New Orleans, said. “The fact that five of our Member Scholars authored or co-authored four of the five articles selected for inclusion speaks to the brilliance of our colleagues and co-travelers in environmental and public health law — and to our organization’s collective, cutting-edge work to harness the power of law and public policy to build a better and more sustainable world.”

I join Rob in sending heartfelt congratulations to all those selected.

Anthology articles include those written by:

A fourth article was written by Sarah Krakoff, a law professor at the University of Colorado at Boulder who is on leave from the Center while serving in the U.S. Department of the Interior. Krakoff is an expert on legal issues relating to Native Americans, public lands, and natural resources, and her article — originally published in the University of Colorado Law Reviewexplores the Grand Canyon National Park on its 100th anniversary through the lens of law, politics, and power. It examines how law facilitated the violent displacement of Indigenous peoples from the park, deepened racial inequity, and fell short of protecting against sexual harassment and discrimination. Krakoff’s article ends with a discussion of how law may yet help our national parks become our nation’s “best idea.”

The fifth article selected for the anthology was written by Bruce Huber, a law professor at the University of Notre Dame, and published in the Washington University Law Review. Huber finds that property owners have little incentive to retain or restore contaminated, depleted, or derelict property and great incentive to abandon it, as demonstrated by economic busts in coal and oil and gas markets. The increasing presence of “negative-value property” demands legal tools to ensure owners take responsibility for their property, he writes.

The 2022 edition of Land Use and Environment Law Review will be published in September.

The anthology reveals the “diversity, depth, and quality of writing in our field,” J.B. Ruhl, a law professor at Vanderbilt Law School and co-director of the Energy, Environment, and Land Use Program said in a message posted on a listserv for environmental professors. “It is artificial to think that five articles can adequately capture all that, but it is a real treat to see the reviewers engaging thoughtfully at every stage to find a small collection of articles strongly representing what we do.”

Showing 2,818 results

Minor Sinclair | June 14, 2022

Member Scholars Take Center Stage in Prestigious Environmental Law Anthology

I’m thrilled to share that the Center for Progressive Reform features prominently in the pages of a forthcoming anthology of last year’s best writing on environmental law. Three of five articles selected for inclusion in the 2022 edition of the anthology were written or co-written by our esteemed Member Scholars — law professors who generously donate their time and expertise to help us achieve our mission to create a more responsive and inclusive government, a healthier environment, and a just society. A fourth article was authored by a Member Scholar who is on leave from the center while serving in the Biden administration.

Daniel Farber | June 9, 2022

Whose Interests Count? And How Much?

Should regulators take into account harm to people in other countries? What about harm to future generations? Should we give special attention when the disadvantaged are harmed? These questions are central to climate policy and some other important environmental issues. I’ll use cost-benefit analysis as a framework for discussing these issues. You probably don’t need my help in thinking about the ethical issues, so instead I’ll focus on legal and economic considerations.

Rebecca Bratspies | June 7, 2022

No Sacrifice Zones in Research Either!

Lessons from A Community Science Research Partnership in South-East Queens

Daniel Farber | May 25, 2022

After the Court Rules: Gaming out Responses to a Cutback in EPA Authority

In West Virginia v. EPA, the U.S. Supreme Court is reviewing former President Obama’s Clean Power Plan. The Clean Power Plan (CPP) itself no longer has any practical relevance, but there’s every reason to predict the Court will strike it down. The big question is what the Biden administration should do next. That depends on the breadth of the Court’s opinion.

Marcha Chaudry | May 24, 2022

The Impacts on Climate: Chemicals in Cosmetics

Conventional wisdom holds that seeing "natural" and “organic" on product labels somehow means the companies selling those goods are using better, safer ingredients. However, these words often offer a false promise to consumers and the planet.

William Funk | May 24, 2022

What the Fifth Circuit Got Wrong About the 7th Amendment in Jarkesy

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling in Jarkesy v. Securities and Exchange Comm'n is a potential blockbuster. In 2020, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) held that George Jarkesy had engaged in misrepresentation in certain public statements, thereby committing securities fraud. The SEC ordered Jarkesy to cease and desist and to pay a civil penalty. In addition, the agency barred him from certain securities industry activities.

Alex Kupyna | May 23, 2022

Center Experts Lend Their Voices to Podcast on Environmental Justice and Chemical Disasters

While the Center for Progressive Reform staff advocate for stronger protections from toxic chemical spills, none of our experts assumed that one of our own would gain firsthand experience on the matter.

Jake Moore | May 19, 2022

Worker Safety Means Environmental Regulation

In 2001, an explosion at the Motiva Enterprises Delaware City Refinery caused a 1 million gallon sulfuric acid spill, killing one worker and severely injuring eight others. In 2008, an aboveground storage tank containing 2 million gallons of liquid fertilizer collapsed at the Allied Terminals facility in Chesapeake, Virginia, critically injuring two workers exposed to hazardous vapors. In 2021, the release of over 100,000 gallons of chemicals at a Texas plant killed two contractors and hospitalized 30 others. In addition to injury and death, workplace chemical spills and exposures contribute to an estimated 50,000 work-related diseases such as asthma and chronic lung disease each year, as well as nearly 200,000 hospitalizations. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) was created to reduce risks and hazards to workers, and to prevent incidents like these. However, following through on this promise has been another matter.

Daniel Farber | May 4, 2022

Clarifying the Congressional Review Act

Soon after Trump took office, Republicans used the Congressional Review Act (CRA) to overturn sixteen Obama-era regulations. If they win control of the government in 2024, they'll undoubtedly do the same thing to Biden regulations. It behooves us, then, to understand the effect of these legislative interventions. A Ninth Circuit ruling last week in a case involving bear baiting, Safari Club v. Haaland sheds new light on this murky subject.