Join us.

We’re working to create a just society and preserve a healthy environment for future generations. Donate today to help.

Donate

Verchick: To Build Climate Resilience, We Need to ‘Start Living with Water’ 

From Florida’s sea-battered coast to small mountain communities in landlocked Kentucky, nowhere, it seems, is safe from flooding these days. Even California’s Death Valley — the arid trough in the Mojave Desert known as “the hottest place on earth” — saw record floods this year. 

Flooding is, of course, nothing new. The story of human civilization is well marked by extreme weather — and extreme water — events. We’ve been “living with water” for centuries, whether in New Orleans, Amsterdam, Kolkata, Dhaka, or Jakarta. And it’s not for nothing that severe floods are often described as “biblical,” a nod to their enduring presence in human life.

But how do today’s floods differ from their predecessors and how can we prepare for and respond to them? More importantly, how can we live with them — and even thrive in their wake? 

Rob Verchick, president of the Center for Progressive Reform and author of a forthcoming book on climate resilience, explored that question last month on History Behind News, a podcast that examines the historical dimensions of current events. The conversation came just before Hurricane Ian struck and flooded coastal Florida — and inundated news outlets and airwaves with stories about loss of life and untold billions in property damage.

Forthcoming Book

Much of the conversation focused on Verchick’s book, The Octopus in the Parking Garage, so named for the poor cephalopod that was flushed into the garage of a luxury condominium by an unusually high tide in Miami. In his book, Verchick calls the incident an “eight-armed alarm bell” and calls on readers to adapt to our changing climate and address the damage already done — and explains what that looks like on the ground (and in the water) as he paddles through Louisiana’s bayous, hikes in the Mojave Desert, and dives off Key Largo. 

To be published in advance of Earth Day, Octopus has already received a glowing review in the New Orleans Times-Picayune from Pulitzer Prize-winning reporter Bob Marshall and attention from Inside Higher Ed in a piece about disaster resilience in Ian’s wake.

In his conversation with Adel Aali, a lawyer and medical entrepreneur-turned podcaster, Verchick explains that humanity has always struggled with floods, and cited such incidents as the heavy rains that deluged South Dakota’s Black Hills a half century ago, killing more than 200 people and injuring thousands. But “climate breakdown” is making matters worse. As our planet heats up, snow is melting, seas are rising, and air is warming, which makes the atmosphere capable of holding more water vapor, which in turn leads to larger cloud “bursts” — and more intense storms with more voluminous surges.

‘Mamboing on a Bubble’

Infrastructure failure — and our tendency to live where “perhaps we shouldn’t” — is also to blame, he said, citing such infamous dam failures as those in Johnstown, Pennsylvania, and near Los Angeles that killed hundreds. He also flagged the 1927 incident when the fabled Mississippi overran its banks, burst levees, and drowned hundreds, many of them people of color.

We tend to underinvest and over-rely on shared resources, Verchick told Aali. At the same time, we continue living in flood-prone areas despite increasing risk, he said — comparing the lifestyle to “mamboing on a bubble.” People are still buying and developing property in flood-risk areas, but they will stop at some point, he cautions, either because insurance or maintenance will get too expensive, and there will be severe economic consequences that will hit low-wealth people most. “Everybody knows that bubble is going to burst,” but right now, “it’s a party.” 

The challenge, he said, is not whether to act — but how far to go. 

The good news is that the federal government is making some investments in shared infrastructure, through new laws like the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, which set aside $1.2 trillion for public transit, clean drinking water, broadband internet, and renewable energy, and the $739 billion Inflation Reduction Act, a landmark law to curb the effects of climate change.

Grassroots advocates and groups are also taking action. In Verchick’s New Orleans, the local government is supporting a massive coastal restoration project — the largest in the world, in fact — to repair damaged wetlands, a natural flood defense. The city, which was famously deluged in in 2005 during Hurricane Katrina, is also investing in “green infrastructure,” including a multi-acre rain garden designed not only for recreation but also for water absorption.

To adapt to climate change and build climate resilience, he said, we need to “start living with water instead of just fighting it all the time.” 

To learn more, listen to the podcastread an early review, and order an advance copy of Octopus in the Parking Garage.

Showing 2,824 results

A view from underwater

Allison Stevens | October 6, 2022

Verchick: To Build Climate Resilience, We Need to ‘Start Living with Water’ 

From Florida’s sea-battered coast to small mountain communities in landlocked Kentucky, nowhere, it seems, is safe from flooding these days. Even California’s Death Valley — the arid trough in the Mojave Desert known as “the hottest place on earth” — saw record floods this year.  Flooding is, of course, nothing new. The story of human civilization is […]

James Goodwin | September 29, 2022

The EPA Shows It Can Do Better Regulatory Analysis. Will Biden Follow?

Last month, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) released what is almost certainly the best regulatory analysis it has performed in over 40 years. (To be clear, though, the bar for these analyses is pretty low.) More importantly, it provides President Biden with new impetus to finally follow through with the long overdue implementation of his administration’s “Modernizing Regulatory Review” memorandum.

James Goodwin | September 28, 2022

Biden Has Fallen Behind on Regulatory Policy. Revesz’s Confirmation Won’t Change That.

What does President Joe Biden believe on regulatory policy? It is striking that after 20 months of his administration, we still do not know. Unfortunately, rather than shed light on this crucial issue, September 29th's Senate confirmation hearing to consider the nomination of law professor Richard Revesz as the next administrator of the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) is likely to raise more uncertainty.

The Founders of the Center stand together

Alexandra Rogan, Allison Stevens | September 28, 2022

The Center’s “Battery Pack”: Toasting our Member Scholars on Our 20th Anniversary

This month, three Member Scholars – Dave Owen, Rob Fischman, and Rob Glicksman – take center stage in the latest edition of Land Use and Environment Law Review (LUELR), an anthology of last year’s best writing on environmental law. In August, Member Scholar Rebecca Bratspies, earned the 2022 International Human Rights Award from the Centre for International Sustainable Development Law, and […]

A construction worker wipes sweat from his forehead

Marcha Chaudry, Sidney A. Shapiro | September 26, 2022

Congress Must Protect Workers from Extreme Heat — Now

As Cole Porter crooned in 1948, “It’s too darn hot.”  California and other parts of the American West are heading into another week of excessive heat that not only threatens public health and safety but also power shortages, which would cut millions off from the energy they need to fuel their lives. Workers, particularly those […]

Daniel Farber | September 22, 2022

Cost-Benefit Analysis and Deep Uncertainty

Since 1981, cost-benefit analysis has been at the core of the rulemaking process. The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), the so-called “regulatory czar” in the White House, must approve every significant regulation based on a review of its cost-benefit analysis. But cost-benefit analysis has had a major blind spot. It embodies techniques for analyzing possible harmful outcomes when the probability of those outcomes can be quantified with reasonable confidence. When those probabilities cannot be quantified (“deep uncertainty”), the analytic path is more difficult. This issue is especially important in the context of climate change, given the potential for tipping points to produce disastrous outcomes.

Collage of images and the Center's logo

Allison Stevens | September 13, 2022

A New Look for a New Era

The founding of the United States was far from perfect, reflecting the deep flaws and exploitative practices of the founders themselves. But there was one thing they got right: They created a government charged, in part, with protecting the general welfare. That includes you, me, the American people writ large, and our environment. We at […]

Katlyn Schmitt | September 12, 2022

EPA’s Chemical Disaster Rule: Small Steps Forward When Environmental Justice Demands Giant Leaps

At the end of August, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposed a draft rule to better protect people who live near industrial facilities with hazardous chemicals on site. The rule would strengthen EPA’s Risk Management Program (RMP), which regulates more than 12,000 facilities in the United States that store, use, and distribute significant amounts of dangerous chemicals.

Daniel Farber | September 9, 2022

Climate Policy: What’s Happening at the State Level?

States have played a critical role in U.S. climate policy. The federal government is now supporting that role with federal funding for states. In the meantime, a number of states have moved a step further in plans to phase out gas and diesel vehicles. Two key states have ramped up their plans for carbon neutrality, while offshore wind made a big step forward in the Midwest.