North Carolinians are facing more threats to our clean energy future at both the state and federal levels.
At the state level, there’s Senate Bill 266 (SB 266) — formerly Senate Bill 261 (SB 261) — a bad deal for our environment, our public health, and our wallets. And at the federal level, an effective proposed repeal of the Inflation Reduction Act clean energy tax credits imperils North Carolina’s clean energy boom just when we’re poised to benefit from it the most.
SB 266 modifies the state’s carbon reduction law, which requires the state’s monopoly utility, Duke Energy, to reduce carbon emissions by 70 percent by 2030 and to achieve carbon neutrality by 2050. With SB 266, those 2030 carbon reduction interim goals are stripped away and artificial limits are placed on clean, renewable energy resources, leaving gaping loopholes for Duke Energy to continue building polluting methane gas plants. Burning methane gas releases carbon dioxide, the primary greenhouse gas leading to climate change. It also produces ground-level ozone, which causes respiratory health issues, cancer, and heart disease.
SB 266 increases rates in two ways. The first is through an increase in Construction Work in Progress (CWIP) costs, which are levied on customers for planned gas and nuclear facilities that may never even come online. Our neighbors in South Carolina have already learned the financial risk of CWIPs — to the tune of a $9 billion debt — all for a nuclear plant that never produced electricity and that customers are still paying off. A second increase would come through changes in the way power costs are allocated to residential customers. This is technical, but EQ Research has shown that these changes would mean a 19 percent cost increase to ratepayers, or a statewide total of about $86.9 million. SB 266 is an all around bad deal.
Simultaneously, our state is seeing Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) clean energy investments come under threat, leading to potential increased costs to residents, job losses, and a slowdown of economic development. The federal 2025 budget reconciliation bill, now in the Senate, threatens hard won clean energy tax credits for households, individuals, and large-scale manufacturing operations — such as the Clean Electricity Production Credit and the Clean Electricity Investment Credit (originally planned to phase out in 2032, though this has now been accelerated to 2028). Effectively repealing clean energy manufacturing tax credits could cost tens of thousands of jobs and billions in investments and permanently damage North Carolina’s current clean energy boom.
In addition, the reconciliation bill would eliminate residential tax credits like the Energy Efficient Home Improvement Credit (EEHIC) and Residential Clean Energy Credit (RCEC), which have already had a significant impact on bill savings in this state. For example, 62,000 North Carolina families saved on average of $1,000 on taxes with the EEHIC and 26,000 households have saved over $4,000 on taxes with the RCEC. Almost a million households use propane, and they stand to lose the most if these tax credits are axed.
Our state deserves affordable, clean energy for all people. SB 266 and the proposed repeal of IRA tax credits are combining to imperil our state’s equitable clean energy transition at the expense of the health of people, the planet, and our collective economic well being.
Showing 2,909 results
Sophie Loeb | June 11, 2025
North Carolinians are facing more threats to our clean energy future at both the state and federal levels.
Shelley Welton | June 10, 2025
In the 1930s, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt and like-minded thinkers advanced the idea of publicly owned utilities as a “yardstick” against which private utilities’ performance could be measured. When private utilities fell short, the threat of public power would discipline these entities into better behavior, or would result in full-out replacement by utilities owned and controlled by municipalities, state entities, or the federal government. This theory animated an impressive array of New Deal efforts at rural electrification, in which the government directly built out large-scale public electricity generation and funded communities to create their own local power systems in areas of the country that private utilities refused to serve.
James Goodwin | June 6, 2025
There are many reasons why Senate Republicans’ recent decision to defy the parliamentarian and repeal California’s Clean Air Act waivers using the Congressional Review Act (CRA) was objectionable. But one objection that hasn’t received enough – any? – attention is how legislative gimmicks like the CRA contribute to the broader problem of congressional dysfunction.
Minor Sinclair | May 29, 2025
Never before in our lifetimes has the rule of law felt so tenuous. These are not normal times for a research and advocacy organization dedicated to “harnessing the power of law and public policy to create a responsive government, healthy environment and just society.” Many of the policy ideas that we have championed — for example, worker safety protections, a fair regulatory system, climate actions that address equity concerns — have been adopted in some form. And today, these policies, as well as the democratic institutions which enforce them, are under threat.
Federico Holm | May 27, 2025
Since our last update on May 19, we have seen some critical developments regarding Congressional Review Act (CRA) resolutions. In addition to the relentless progression of some resolutions towards becoming law, the most troublesome was the decision in the Senate to vote on the CRA resolutions ending Clean Air Act waivers issued to California. As James Goodwin said in a recent blog post on the matter, this represents a clear example of Senate Republicans “failing to follow the rules that they agreed to — and doing so to advance their policy agenda without heed to the rule of law wreckage they leave in their wake."
James Goodwin | May 22, 2025
The disease of authoritarianism now afflicting our democracy spread to yet another of our governing institutions the night of May 21. Do not be fooled: The debate over Senate Republicans' misuse of the Congressional Review Act (CRA) is not “inside baseball” or wonky or even complicated. Rather, it’s a simple story of legislators failing to follow the rules that they agreed to — and doing so to advance their policy agenda without heed to the rule of law wreckage they leave in their wake.
Daniel Farber | May 20, 2025
President Donald Trump has taken some dramatic steps in the name of improving use of NEPA, the statute governing environmental reviews of projects. The goal is to speed up the permitting process and make it more efficient. The reality is that his efforts will create chaos and uncertainty, with the likely effect of slowing things down.
Federico Holm | May 19, 2025
Since our last update (May 12), we have seen some movement regarding Congressional Review Act (CRA) resolutions. The pace has remained high, with outlets like The Hill and Banking Dive reporting that President Trump has signed multiple resolutions into law. Oddly, no official sources (like the White House’s website or congress.gov) reflect these developments.
Federico Holm | May 12, 2025
Since our last update (May 6), we have seen some movement regarding Congressional Review Act (CRA) resolutions. The pace in the Senate remained high, and we have seen lawmakers try to maximize their output before the CRA cutoff date.