Join us.

We’re working to create a just society and preserve a healthy environment for future generations. Donate today to help.

Donate

Building a More Energy-Resilient Future for All

Our climate is changing quickly — and outpacing our nation’s ability to prevent or prepare for disruptions to our energy system. And, as is so often the case in the wake of natural disasters, low-wealth people and communities of color, who contribute the least to climate change, are most at risk. 

Hurricane Ian, which last week struck my home state, is the most recent illustration. 

Ian left some 2 million of my fellow Floridians, not to mention hundreds of thousands in the Carolinas, without the power they need to light, heat, and cool their homes, cook meals, connect to work and school, or access life-saving medical care.

Several of the most severely impacted counties have high poverty rates. Additionally, about 9 percent of Floridians live in manufactured housing, and the percentage is growing. Approximately 281,000 households in the areas affected by Ian live in manufactured housing,  which is particularly vulnerable to disasters because it isn’t traditionally built to withstand hurricane-level winds or floods.

As Center for Progressive Reform President Rob Verchick notes, “Catastrophe is bad for everyone, but it is especially bad for the weak and disenfranchised.”

One week after Ian made landfall, almost 200,000 customers of Florida Power & Light, the state’s main power company, are still navigating floods and still without power. Those who have been able to evade flooded areas are seeking refuge at outage relief sites within various Florida counties. These sites are providing temporary shelter, food, water, and even charging stations, as many victims haven’t been able to contact friends and family during the disaster. Electric companies are working to restore power, but, due to extensive flooding, it has taken longer than usual to do so.

I have a sense of what they’re going through. As a Louisiana native, having spent my formative years in Baton Rouge, I vividly remember when Hurricane Katrina struck in 2005. The storm and its aftermath left my family without power for two weeks during one of the hottest and most humid months of the year. Without electricity, two weeks felt like an eternity. I distinctly remember my mother driving us back and forth to a family member's home to charge our cell phones, take a hot shower, and cool down for a few minutes each day. I considered myself fortunate to have that option when so many others did not. 

Grocery stores were also without power, making it difficult to find water. To purchase a gallon or two — the maximum allotment — we had to stand in the grocery store line for long periods, and the lines stretched to the back of the store. Almost two decades later, these memories flood back to me as I consider the Floridians who are now experiencing the aftereffects of Ian.

A More Energy-Resilient Future

Natural disasters in the United States and around the world are becoming common as our climate changes. Storms are becoming more frequent and intense, sea levels are rising, and waters are warming. At the same time, our population is growing, which places a strain on resources and exposes more people to climate-related issues such as hurricanes and flooding, especially in low-resource areas. As the population grows, we’re developing more of our natural land, drilling more oil, and cutting down forests — all activities that exacerbate climate change and damage our environment’s “natural infrastructure.” 

With an ever growing number of people relying on traditional energy sources, it becomes more and more difficult to recover in times of disaster. As Ian churned toward Florida, Gov. Ron DeSantis declared a State of Emergency. Evacuations were not encouraged until one day before Ian made landfall, at which point the economically advantaged were able to evacuate while the already overburdened were forced to ride out the storm. Many residents live paycheck-to-paycheck and had no financial cushion to weather the storm — no emergency fund, no extra food and water, no home generator—and have had to go without energy for extended periods, making it difficult to carry out basic activities, like cooking, working, and going to school.

Fortunately, many in the public and private sectors are working to build a more energy resilient future for all.

From 2005 to 2015, Florida Power & Light has undertaken efforts to make Florida’s energy grids more resilient by progressively replacing wooden electric poles with concrete fixtures, which are better equipped to withstand extreme weather. In both Florida and the Carolinas, electric companies placed extra crew members on standby in preparation of Ian. 

Not Enough

But these efforts don’t go nearly far enough — and don’t take equity into full or fair account.

All the while, the inequality gap is widening. 

As Ian demonstrated, decades-old energy-related hurricane plans don’t meet the needs of today’s social infrastructure. Although electric companies had extra crew members on standby, flooding and wreckage have prevented access to hard-hit areas. Black community members say they are used to being the last to have power restored during inclement weather and didn’t expect any difference with Ian. 

One proposed solution to energy injustice is to empower communities to generate their own electricity utilizing renewables. This not only reduces carbon emissions, but it also alleviates the burden of high energy costs and ensures security and resilience in the wake of extreme weather events. The Center for Progressive Reform recently launched a Campaign for Energy Justice in North Carolina. Concerns have been raised about affordability and equity as the state's leading energy company plans to dramatically reduce carbon emissions through renewable energy. Everyone, not just the wealthy, needs reliable access to affordable clean energy.  

In a 2018 report published by the Center for Progressive Reform, ​​From Surviving to Thriving: Equity in Disaster Planning and Recovery, the authors suggest rethinking our infrastructure and making room for “smart” power grids that provide clean energy.  The report makes several good recommendations, only some of which have been implemented.

Showing 2,818 results

Building debris and downed power lines

Rachel Mayo | October 12, 2022

Building a More Energy-Resilient Future for All

Our climate is changing quickly — and outpacing our nation’s ability to prevent or prepare for disruptions to our energy system. And, as is so often the case in the wake of natural disasters, low-wealth people and communities of color, who contribute the least to climate change, are most at risk.  Hurricane Ian, which last […]

A California neighborhood set in hills

Catalina Gonzalez | October 11, 2022

Environmental Justice Advocates Call for Stronger Climate Protections for Impacted California Communities

This is the second post in a three-part series on recent efforts to place justice and equity at the center of California’s climate plans. The first post and third post are also available on our blog. Environmental justice advocates are calling on California regulators to strengthen protections for underserved and overburdened communities — which are disproportionately […]

California State Capitol Building

Catalina Gonzalez | October 10, 2022

California Agency Strengthens Decarbonization Plan 

This is the first post in a three-part series on recent efforts to place justice and equity at the center of California’s climate plans. Part II and Part III will run October 11 and 12. In a major victory for climate justice, California regulators recently announced significant improvements to the statewide plan, the AB32 2022 Scoping Plan Update, to […]

A view from underwater

Allison Stevens | October 6, 2022

Verchick: To Build Climate Resilience, We Need to ‘Start Living with Water’ 

From Florida’s sea-battered coast to small mountain communities in landlocked Kentucky, nowhere, it seems, is safe from flooding these days. Even California’s Death Valley — the arid trough in the Mojave Desert known as “the hottest place on earth” — saw record floods this year.  Flooding is, of course, nothing new. The story of human civilization is […]

James Goodwin | September 29, 2022

The EPA Shows It Can Do Better Regulatory Analysis. Will Biden Follow?

Last month, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) released what is almost certainly the best regulatory analysis it has performed in over 40 years. (To be clear, though, the bar for these analyses is pretty low.) More importantly, it provides President Biden with new impetus to finally follow through with the long overdue implementation of his administration’s “Modernizing Regulatory Review” memorandum.

James Goodwin | September 28, 2022

Biden Has Fallen Behind on Regulatory Policy. Revesz’s Confirmation Won’t Change That.

What does President Joe Biden believe on regulatory policy? It is striking that after 20 months of his administration, we still do not know. Unfortunately, rather than shed light on this crucial issue, September 29th's Senate confirmation hearing to consider the nomination of law professor Richard Revesz as the next administrator of the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) is likely to raise more uncertainty.

The Founders of the Center stand together

Alexandra Rogan, Allison Stevens | September 28, 2022

The Center’s “Battery Pack”: Toasting our Member Scholars on Our 20th Anniversary

This month, three Member Scholars – Dave Owen, Rob Fischman, and Rob Glicksman – take center stage in the latest edition of Land Use and Environment Law Review (LUELR), an anthology of last year’s best writing on environmental law. In August, Member Scholar Rebecca Bratspies, earned the 2022 International Human Rights Award from the Centre for International Sustainable Development Law, and […]

A construction worker wipes sweat from his forehead

Marcha Chaudry, Sidney A. Shapiro | September 26, 2022

Congress Must Protect Workers from Extreme Heat — Now

As Cole Porter crooned in 1948, “It’s too darn hot.”  California and other parts of the American West are heading into another week of excessive heat that not only threatens public health and safety but also power shortages, which would cut millions off from the energy they need to fuel their lives. Workers, particularly those […]

Daniel Farber | September 22, 2022

Cost-Benefit Analysis and Deep Uncertainty

Since 1981, cost-benefit analysis has been at the core of the rulemaking process. The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), the so-called “regulatory czar” in the White House, must approve every significant regulation based on a review of its cost-benefit analysis. But cost-benefit analysis has had a major blind spot. It embodies techniques for analyzing possible harmful outcomes when the probability of those outcomes can be quantified with reasonable confidence. When those probabilities cannot be quantified (“deep uncertainty”), the analytic path is more difficult. This issue is especially important in the context of climate change, given the potential for tipping points to produce disastrous outcomes.