Join us.

We’re working to create a just society and preserve a healthy environment for future generations. Donate today to help.

Donate

The Year Ahead

This post was originally published on Legal Planet. Reprinted with permission.

Here we are, starting another year. Last year turned out to have some major environmental developments. The most notable were the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in the West Virginia v. EPA case, striking down the Clean Power Plan, and the passage of the Inflation Reduction Act, with its huge economic incentives for clean energy. Here’s a quick rundown of what 2023 might hold in store.

  1. The Sackett case. A ruling in this case, now back in the Supreme Court a second time, could slash federal protection of wetlands and small streams, especially in the West.

  2. The Pork Producers case. The case involves a California law prohibiting sale of pork produced from pigs that were not humanely raised. Depending on how the opinion is written, it could also impact how much authority states have to limit the sale of electricity from fossil fuel generators or the sale of high-emissions vehicle fuels.

  3. Investigations. We’re going to see constant political theater in which House Republicans will haul administration officials in front of Congress for abuse and pepper them with burdensome document requests.

  4. EPA regulations. Because of West Virginia v. EPA, the agency will have to come up with a new approach to regulating carbon emissions from existing power plants. In addition, there are major air pollution rules in the works, which may lead to less use of fossil fuels.

  5. FERC transmission rules. New transmission lines are crucial to the energy transition. FERC is trying to come up with rules that will streamline the approval process, which at this point is tremendously cumbersome.

  6. Climate disclosure rules. The SEC has proposed rules requiring extensive disclosure relating to carbon emissions and climate risks by large companies. Biden has now proposed imposing similar rules on federal contractors. Expect litigation when these are finalized.

  7. Spending battles. The Republicans won’t be able to pass new legislation of their own given Biden’s veto power and Democratic control of the Senate. They do have the ability to cut budgets for agencies like EPA. They may also try to attach riders to must-pass laws, designed to suspend or roll back environmental requirements. Democrats will push back.

  8. Possible new energy legislation. We’re obviously not going to see major new legislation. There may be bipartisan support for targeted efforts to streamline permitting in order to allow rapid rollout of transmission and other energy infrastructure. We might also see legislation focused specifically on transmission issues.

  9. State climate and energy regulation. Blue states will forge ahead with their climate programs, if anything with more enthusiasm as pushback against Republicans in Congress. Other states are going to be trying to figure out how to respond to the massive new incentives for clean energy in the Inflation Reduction Act.

  10. Suits against oil companies. The Supreme Court will decide sometime in the spring whether to rule on a crucial procedural issue. Oil companies want to move climate change lawsuits from state to federal court, where the industry has a better chance of winning. That move could torpedo the lawsuits.

No doubt there will be some surprises, but for now, these seem to be the biggest things on the horizon. Stay tuned for further developments!

Showing 2,824 results

Daniel Farber | January 3, 2023

The Year Ahead

Here we are, starting another year. Last year turned out to have some major environmental developments. The most notable were the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in the West Virginia v. EPA case, striking down the Clean Power Plan, and the passage of the Inflation Reduction Act, with its huge economic incentives for clean energy. Here’s a quick rundown of what 2023 might hold in store.

Robert L. Glicksman | January 3, 2023

Op-Ed: How Climate Legislation Protects the Environment and Public Health

In August, with relatively little fanfare, President Biden signed into law the Inflation Reduction Act. While the act’s provisions do indeed have the potential to reduce inflation, it also represents the most significant measure Congress has ever adopted to combat climate change. The act’s measures to mitigate climate change have attracted some attention in the press, but what has been largely missing has been an analysis of its potential to deliver important protections against the myriad adverse public health consequences that scientists have linked to climate change.

climate protestors demanding climate and racial justice

Catalina Gonzalez, Katlyn Schmitt | December 15, 2022

Directing Federal Investments to Communities that Need Them Most

In 2021, President Joe Biden created the Justice40 Initiative, which directs at least 40 percent of federal investments in climate, energy, transit, workforce, infrastructure, and environment-related programs to “disadvantaged communities.” The benefits are far-reaching and range from reduced air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions, lower energy burdens (the share households spend on electric and other energy bills), improved public transportation, and the creation of clean energy jobs and training opportunities, among others.

Protestors holding a climate justice sign

Karen Sokol | December 14, 2022

What Comes After the Loss and Damage Fund for Responsibility and Repair in a Climate-Disrupted World?

Climate-driven geophysical shifts are driving geopolitical shifts that are putting increasing pressure on international law and global governance. The recent landmark decision to establish an international “loss and damage” fund offers a glimpse into the challenges and opportunities presented by these ongoing disruptions.

air pollution

Catalina Gonzalez | December 13, 2022

California Agency to Vote on Climate Change Plan

After a year and a half of work, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) is poised to vote on an updated statewide climate plan. The final draft of the plan incorporates ambitious targets for achieving carbon neutrality by 2045, which were updated in September to reflect new legislation and Governor Gavin Newsom’s push for stronger action.

Allison Stevens | December 9, 2022

Virginia’s ‘Gentle Giant’ Leaves Long Legacy in Environmental Justice

Gentle giant. These two words appear over and over again in tributes to the late Rep. Donald McEachin, who died on November 28 from complications from cancer. He was 61. The Virginia Democrat indeed stood tall in the halls of Congress, where he served constituents in and south of Richmond. But he was a giant in the figurative sense of the word, too, particularly when it came to racial equity and environmental justice — issues he championed over two decades in political office.

James Goodwin | December 8, 2022

OIRA Is Working to Improve Public Participation in the Regulatory System. Here Are Some Ideas.

Last month, the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) announced that it was conducting a public listening session to obtain ideas about how the Biden administration could strengthen the public’s ability to engage in the regulatory system. This is an issue we at the Center have been working hard on in recent years. So, we were happy to answer OIRA’s call.

U.S. Capitol in the sunshine in late autumn

Alice Kaswan, Allison Stevens, Emily Hammond, Karen Sokol | November 22, 2022

How Will the Midterm Elections Affect Climate Justice? Member Scholars Offer Expert Insights

We asked our Member Scholars how the election outcomes will affect policy going forward in our three priority policy areas. Today’s post covers the implications for climate justice.

US Capitol Building behind green trees

Allison Stevens, David Driesen, James Goodwin, Sidney A. Shapiro, Thomas McGarity | November 21, 2022

How Will the Midterm Elections Affect Regulation? Member Scholars and Staff Offer Expert Insights

We asked several of our Member Scholars how the midterm election outcomes will affect policy going forward in our three priority policy areas. Today’s post covers the implications for regulations.