I’ve been in Bangalore, India for about two months on a Fulbright fellowship to study Indian environmental law. While I knew India has major problems with air pollution and sanitation, I didn’t expect that one of the major environmental controversies here would be about greening the idol industry. Apparently, the gods in India can wreak havoc on the environment.
Each year, Indians sink millions of idols in rivers and lakes to celebrate various festivals. The biggest festival for idol sinking is Ganesh Chaturthi, held each August or September in honor of the elephant god Ganesh. Hindus sink Ganesh idols for a variety of reasons, including purifying the home, casting away misfortune, and returning the God to the earth.
The problem is that most of the idols are made of plaster of Paris and are decorated with brightly colored paints that contain dyes and heavy metals such as mercury and lead. The plaster of Paris gradually dissolves into the water bodies, making the water cloudy and alkaline and depleting oxygen for aquatic life. The paints and dyes make the water toxic.
Like most environmental problems in India, the numbers are immense. In just one neighborhood in Hyderabad last year, over 48,000 Ganesh idols were sunk in the lakes. In the city of Thane, 250,000 idols are believed to be at the bottom of the city’s waterways.
Indian environmental authorities began to crack down on plaster of Paris idols about three years ago, and within months, the controversy ended up in court. The gods don’t have standing to sue in India. The plaintiff in the case was a coalition of idol manufacturers, who argued that they have a “fundamental right to deal in trading/manufacturing of Plaster of Paris idols.”
In May 2013, India’s new National Green Tribunal gave a partial victory to the idol manufacturers, overturning some of the environmental restrictions and ruling that state pollution control authorities could ban plaster of Paris idols only if they could prove that plaster of Paris is a water pollutant under Indian law.
A case of environmental protection versus religious freedom? Not quite: The Tribunal observed that immersing plaster idols may not be a proper way of honoring the gods and goddesses after all. The court noted that “one who has seen mutilated PoP Plaster of Paris idols resurging on surface of the seawater, after the high-tide is over, will not forget its pathetic sight and plight…The sight of such mutilated idols . . . give serious jolt to the religious sentiments.”
Since the Green Tribunal’s ruling, states across India have been scrambling to assemble the latest scientific information on the polluting properties of idols. A complete ban on plaster of Paris idols will provide the most water quality benefits but can’t be enforced. The problem is that the public likes the brightly colored idols and has largely resisted earth-friendly alternatives, such as clay.
So what’s the solution? Reduce, re-use, recycle. The Maharashtra Pollution Control Board is urging the state to adopt a “one idol, one village” policy in which one huge statue would be sunk in each water body, preventing millions of citizens from individually sinking their idols in lakes. The Board is considering height restrictions on the idols, and it is urging the state to promote idols made of recycled materials, such as paper and cardboard.
The state of Andhra Pradesh is going one step further. It is conducting experiments to see if Ganesh idols can be made out of materials that actually clean the lakes and rivers -- a kind of divine remediation. One promising material is the seed of the Moringa tree, which absorbs dirt, particles, and heavy metals when immersed in water.
Like so many things in India, old traditions are rapidly eroding. Dirty industries are being replaced by high tech, and the age of the pollution-fighting idol is just around the corner.
Showing 2,916 results
| March 26, 2014
I’ve been in Bangalore, India for about two months on a Fulbright fellowship to study Indian environmental law. While I knew India has major problems with air pollution and sanitation, I didn’t expect that one of the major environmental controversies here would be about greening the idol industry. Apparently, the gods in India can wreak […]
James Goodwin | March 19, 2014
For years, Duke Energy has enjoyed virtual free rein to contaminate North Carolina’s surface and ground waters with arsenic, lead, selenium, and all of the other toxic ingredients in its coal ash waste in clear violation of the Clean Water Act and other federal environmental laws. And it seems that both North Carolina’s regulators and […]
Wendy Wagner | March 18, 2014
Basic disclosures of conflicts of interest have been required by the top science journals for decades. Yet most regulatory agencies – despite strong urging from a variety of bipartisan sources – have failed to require these disclosures for private research submitted to inform regulatory decisions. This omission is particularly alarming since, unlike journals, agencies used this […]
Anne Havemann | March 17, 2014
Maryland faces an important deadline in its long-running effort to clean up the Chesapeake Bay. By 2017, the state will be legally required to have put in place a number of specific measures to reduce the massive quantities of pollution that now flow into the Bay from a range of pollution sources in the state. […]
Rena Steinzor | March 13, 2014
A scant five days before the Department of Interior opens a new round of bids for oil leases in the Gulf of Mexico, the EPA has blinked, pronouncing BP, the incorrigible corporate scofflaw of the new millennium, once again fit to do business with the government. To get right to the point, the federal government’s […]
James Goodwin | March 10, 2014
If you’re harmed by an improperly labeled prescription drug you’ve taken, should your ability to hold the manufacturer accountable in court depend on whether that drug was “name brand” or “generic”? Strangely, it does matter, thanks to the 2011 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Pilva v. Mensing. There, the Court held that because of a […]
Anne Havemann | March 10, 2014
EPA’s budget is in free-fall. Members of Congress brag that they have slashed it 20 percent since 2010. President Obama’s proposed budget for 2015, released on Tuesday, continues the downward trend. The budget proposal would provide $7.9 billion for EPA, about $300 million, or 3.7 percent, less than the $8.2 billion enacted in fiscal year […]
David Driesen | March 7, 2014
The media has reported, erroneously, that the Obama Administration’s environmental impact statement concluded that the Keystone Pipeline would have no impact on global climate disruption. The facts are a bit more complicated, and much more interesting. Basically, the final EIS concedes that Keystone would increase greenhouse gas emissions, but it uses a silent political judgment […]
Daniel Farber | March 5, 2014
The regulatory process has become more opaque and less accountable. We need to fix that. Every year, thousands of law students take a course in administrative law. It’s a great course, and we wish even more students took it. But there’s a risk that students may come away with a vision of the regulatory process […]