Earlier today, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) published a scathing report, criticizing the regulatory work and research conducted by the Small Business Administration’s (SBA) Office of Advocacy. For the past several years, CPR has worked to bring much-needed attention from policymakers, the press, and the public interest community to the SBA Office of Advocacy, which has long leveraged its powerful position in the rulemaking process to oppose stronger safeguards necessary for protecting people and the environment. Critically, as CPR’s work reveals, the beneficiaries of the SBA Office of Advocacy’s interventions have been large corporations and trade groups, to the detriment of the small businesses they are actually supposed to be helping.
The report, Office of Advocacy Needs to Improve Controls over Research, Regulatory, and Workforce Planning Activities, was conducted in response to a request for a review of “Advocacy’s activities” from the Subcommittee on Financial Services and General Government within the Senate Committee on Appropriations. The report notes that the subcommittee’s request was made because “questions have recently been raised about Advocacy's efforts to represent small businesses in regulatory activities and some of its research on small business issues.”
Some of the key findings that GAO made in its report include the following:
“Advocacy did not ensure that its staff monitored the quality of the information the office disseminated, as required. GAO reviewed 20 selected research products and found that in 16 cases a required quality review had not been documented.”
“Advocacy staff had not followed federal information quality guidelines to retain data and could not substantiate the quality of information in two cost-estimation reports—a research product it has contracted for every 5 years.”
Advocacy staff were not adequately documenting key aspects of their work related to rulemaking activities. For instance, Advocacy staff were not taking adequate steps to document that they had adequate data and information to support their case to intervene in individual rulemakings.
“Advocacy is not following its internal policies meant to ensure its roundtables are as open to the public as they could be.”
CPR has raised these and other criticisms of the SBA Office of Advocacy’s work in the past. A 2013 white paper, Distorting the Interests of Small Business: How the Small Business Administration Office of Advocacy's Politicization of Small Business Concerns Undermines Public Health and Safety, presented a comprehensive description of the antiregulatory role that the SBA Office of Advocacy plays in the rulemaking process. This white paper documented how Advocacy staff failed to justify their decisions to participate in individual rulemakings and the lack of transparency with which Advocacy staff conducted many of their activities, including the regulatory roundtables. CPR President Rena Steinzor testified about many of the criticisms in a March 2013 hearing before the House Small Business Committee’s Subcommittee on Investigations, Oversight and Regulations. Her testimony concluded by calling on the Subcommittee to request a GAO report exactly along the lines of the one released today. Finally, a 2011 white paper presented a comprehensive critique of the now-infamous “Crain and Crain report,” which was one of the SBA Office of Advocacy’s research projects that today’s GAO report singled out for particular criticism. As with today’s GAO report, CPR’s white paper specifically criticized the shoddy peer review process that the SBA Office of Advocacy employed before publishing this research project.
I applaud the GAO for completing such a thorough study and the Senate Appropriations Committee’s Subcommittee on Financial Services and General Government for requesting it. I hope this effort helps to prompt the long-overdue statutory and administrative reforms that are needed to ensure that the SBA Office of Advocacy actually pursues its stated mission of helping small businesses, and to do so in a way that does not undermine public health, safety, and the environment.
Showing 2,830 results
James Goodwin | July 22, 2014
Earlier today, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) published a scathing report, criticizing the regulatory work and research conducted by the Small Business Administration’s (SBA) Office of Advocacy. For the past several years, CPR has worked to bring much-needed attention from policymakers, the press, and the public interest community to the SBA Office of Advocacy, which […]
Erin Kesler | July 15, 2014
New legislation introduced by Senator Blumenthal (D-CT) and co-sponsored by Sens. Bob Casey (D-Pa.) and Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) would ensure that corporate executives who knowingly market life-threatening products or continue unsafe business practices are held criminally responsible when people die or are injured. Under the Hide No Harm Act, key corporate managers will be required […]
Anne Havemann | July 15, 2014
I will never look at a construction site the same way again. Certain types of pollution—mostly sediment, nitrogen, and phosphorus—run into the Chesapeake Bay and fuel algal blooms, creating dead zones where crabs, oysters and other Bay life cannot survive. Indeed, the Chesapeake is on track to have an above-average dead zone this year. Construction […]
Catherine O'Neill | July 14, 2014
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has gone to exceeding lengths to defer to states’ efforts to bring their water quality standards into the twenty-first century. But the state of Washington has shown the perils of this deferential posture, if the goals of the Clean Water Act (CWA) are ever to be reached for our nation’s […]
Matt Shudtz | July 11, 2014
Yesterday, USDA submitted its draft final rule on poultry slaughter “modernization” to OMB for formal review. This rule, as regular readers of CPR Blog will remember, would remove USDA inspectors from poultry slaughtering facilities, transfer some of their food safety and quality control duties to plant employees, and allow the plants to increase their line […]
Erin Kesler | July 11, 2014
Today, CPR President Rena Steinzor testifes at a House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on the Environment and the Economy Hearing entitled, “Constitutional Considerations: States vs. Federal Environmental Implementation Policy.” According to her testimony: As I understand the situation, the Subcommittee’s leadership called this hearing in part to explore the contradiction between the notion that legislation to reauthorize […]
Rena Steinzor | July 11, 2014
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) sent its benighted poultry processing rule to the White House for final review. The millions of consumers who eat undercooked chicken at their peril and the beleaguered workers in these dank, overcrowded, and dangerous plants can only hope the President’s people come to their senses over there and kill […]
Anne Havemann | July 2, 2014
Pennsylvania, the source of nearly half of the nitrogen that makes its way into the Chesapeake Bay, is falling dangerously behind in controlling the pollutant. Delaware is dragging its feet on issuing pollution-control permits to industrial animal farms and wastewater treatment plants. Maryland has fallen behind on reissuing expired stormwater permits and is not on […]
Erin Kesler | June 30, 2014
testv aagin