Join us.

We’re working to create a just society and preserve a healthy environment for future generations. Donate today to help.

Donate

Obama’s Path to Progress: Protecting Families and Children Against Dangerous Food Imports

As I noted in an earlier post, families and friends all across the United States will gather to observe the Thanksgiving holiday tomorrow.   Compared to many other countries, we are lucky that during such occasions we are able to focus on the celebrations enjoyed in the company of our loved ones—and not have to worry so much about whether the meal might cause a foodborne illness.  This is because, while far from perfect, the United States has one of the best food safety systems in the world.

With the food supply chain becoming increasingly globalized, however, a strong system for ensuring the safety of domestically produced foods is no longer enough.  Already, 15 percent of the food consumed in the United States is imported.  Imports make up 91 percent of our seafood, 60 percent of our fruits and vegetables, and 61 percent of our honey.   Unfortunately, many of these imported foods come from countries—such as China, Vietnam, and Mexico—that lack effective health and safety regulation.

In all likelihood, the Thanksgiving meal you sit down to tomorrow will include several imported food items—perhaps garlic in mashed potatoes or stuffing, or perhaps the spices used in a pumpkin pie.

Despite the obvious risks of adulteration and contamination, the resource-strapped Food and Drug Administration (FDA) inspected only 2 percent of food imports and just 0.4 percent of foreign food facilities in 2011.  As the number of food imports increase, this plainly inadequate system for addressing imported food safety will only get worse, leaving more and more Americans at risk of illness or perhaps even premature death.

In part to address this growing threat of contaminated food imports, Congress and President Obama enacted in 2011 the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA).  The law directs the FDA to issue two key regulations to improve the safety of imported foods:  the Foreign Supplier Verification Program and the Accreditation of Third Parties to Conduct Food Safety Audits.  The first rule would require food importers to verify that their foreign suppliers have adequate measures in place to prevent adulteration and contamination, while the second would create an independent auditing system through which foreign food facilities could become “certified” as complying with U.S. food safety standards.  The basic goal of these two rules would be to ensure that imported foods are held to the same high standards that apply to foods produced domestically.

Together, the Foreign Supplier Verification Program and the Accreditation of Third Parties rules make up one of the “Essential 13” regulatory actions highlighted in a recent CPR Issue Alert that outlines an affirmative agenda for achieving progress on crucial public safeguards that the Obama Administration can and should accomplish during its remaining time in office.  Once in place, these rules will help to ensure meaningful protections for families and children against tainted imported foods, which can cause severe illness and even death.  The accomplishment of these safeguards will also help secure President Obama’s legacy as a president who made great strides in protecting public health and safety.

Despite their critical importance, both of these food import safety rules are already years behind schedule.  The FSMA instructed the FDA to issue the final Foreign Supplier Verification Program and the Accreditation of Third Parties rules by January 2012 and July 2012, respectively, yet both rules are still a long ways from completion.  Indeed, the agency didn’t finish the process of proposing these rules until just this past September.  Because of all of these delays, the FDA is now under a court order to complete both rules by no later than October 2015.

The FDA has plenty of time to complete the rule before the close of the Obama Administration, but it cannot allow any further delays.  Next month, the comment period for the latest round of proposals for each of the two rules is set to close, bringing the first test of whether President Obama will demonstrate the political will necessary for getting these rules across the finish line by next October.  At that point, the FDA must begin working toward finalizing the rules and cannot entertain requests for extending the comment period for either or both of the rules.  Any further delays beyond the October 2015 deadline would only increase the already high costs—measured in premature deaths, debilitating illnesses, and wasted money—that have already accrued as a result of not having an effective regulatory program in place to address the risks posed by dangerous food imports.

Showing 2,819 results

James Goodwin | November 26, 2014

Obama’s Path to Progress: Protecting Families and Children Against Dangerous Food Imports

As I noted in an earlier post, families and friends all across the United States will gather to observe the Thanksgiving holiday tomorrow.   Compared to many other countries, we are lucky that during such occasions we are able to focus on the celebrations enjoyed in the company of our loved ones—and not have to worry […]

Daniel Farber | November 26, 2014

The Death of Deference?

Yesterday, the Supreme Court granted cert. in several cases to hear the following question: “Whether the Environmental Protection Agency unreasonably refused to consider costs in determining whether it is appropriate to regulate hazardous air pollutants emitted by electric utilities.” The fundamental issue is whether it was unreasonable for EPA to interpret section 112 to preclude consideration […]

Rena Steinzor | November 26, 2014

EPA’s Long-Delayed Ozone Proposal

How much is it worth to save the life of a grandfather with lung disease or to keep an asthmatic child out of the hospital?  The ozone rule, which EPA proposes today after years of politically motivated delay and while staring down the barrel of a court order, responds to the urgent calls of a gold-standard […]

Erin Kesler | November 25, 2014

Rena Steinzor: Supreme Court Agrees to Review Challenge to EPA’s Mercury Pollution Rule

Today, the Supreme Court agreed to review a challenge to an EPA rule to reduce mercury pollution.  The Utility Air Regulatory Group and the National Mining Association, and twenty-one states, appealed an April 2-1 federal appeals court ruling that upheld EPA’s Mercury and Air Toxics Standards. According to Center for Progressive Reform President and University of Maryland School […]

Erin Kesler | November 25, 2014

Center for Progressive Reform Announces New Executive Director Matthew Shudtz

The Board of Directors of the Center for Progressive Reform today announced the selection of Matthew Shudtz as Executive Director of the 12-year-old organization. Shudtz, who succeeds Jake Caldwell, has been Acting Executive Director of CPR since July of this year. Shudtz joined CPR’s staff in 2006 as a Policy Analyst, and was subsequently promoted […]

Rena Steinzor | November 25, 2014

CPR is Hiring a Chesapeake Bay Policy Analyst

CPR is on the hunt for an energetic, organized, and dedicated advocate to join our staff as a Policy Analyst. The focus of this position is restoring the Chesapeake Bay through strong implementation of the Bay TMDL. We are especially interested in candidates who have a background in the legal and policy issues related to […]

James Goodwin | November 24, 2014

Obama’s Path to Progress: Safeguarding Families Against Tainted Processed Foods and Produce

Later this week, most of us in the United States will gather together for the simple but meaningful act of sharing a meal as a way to celebrate and reflect upon the relationships and blessings that enrich our lives.  The menus will differ from table to table, and family to family, of course.  But very […]

Sidney A. Shapiro | November 20, 2014

New Legislation: How the House of Representatives Would Use Scientific Uncertainty to Stop Environmental Legislation

The House of Representatives has passed legislation (H.R. 1422) that prohibits academic scientists on EPA’s Scientific Advisory committee from participating in “activities that directly or indirectly involve review of evaluation of their own work,” but allows scientists who work for industry to serve on the Board as long as they reveal their respective conflicts of […]

Matt Shudtz | November 19, 2014

Obama’s Path to Progress: Protecting Farmworker Kids

Next week in this space, we’ll ask you to think about the food on your Thanksgiving table and what FDA ought to do to keep it safe. Today, I want to focus on how the food gets there—in particular, the work children contribute to the farms where our food and other crops are grown. Many […]