Join us.

We’re working to create a just society and preserve a healthy environment for future generations. Donate today to help.

Donate

Chemical Spills, Leaks, Fires, and Explosions Cry Out for Stronger Delaware River, Worker Protections

The Delaware River Basin is a vital ecosystem that provides drinking water for millions of people and supports diverse wildlife, recreation, and agriculture in Pennsylvania, New York, and New Jersey. Unfortunately, industrial activities in the basin contaminate the water with toxic pollutants, leading to a variety of negative impacts on human health and the environment and endangering industrial workers.

Wastewater treatment plants are one major source of industrial pollution in the Delaware River. These facilities often lack the capacity to properly treat industrial waste, leading to the release of harmful chemicals. Leakage and spills from pipelines and storage facilities also significantly pollute the Delaware. These incidents can release large quantities of toxic chemicals into the river, leading to fish kills and other negative impacts.

Industrial activities in the region also contribute to nutrient pollution, which can lead to the growth of harmful algal blooms and low oxygen conditions that make the river inhospitable to fish and other aquatic life.

Given the importance of the Delaware River, it is crucial for policymakers at all levels of government to prevent pollution and protect this valuable resource for all communities in the region. Some general solutions include:

More specifically, the Delaware River Basin Commission (DRBC), the interstate agency that oversees the health and environmental integrity of the watershed, should strengthen regulations to prevent toxic chemicals from being released into the basin. More robust regulations should include implementing stricter permit requirements for industrial facilities, monitoring the discharge of toxic chemicals, and increasing penalties for violations.

Protecting workers

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also plays a key role in protecting the watershed from toxic chemicals. The agency is responsible for enforcing federal environmental laws and regulations to protect the quality of surface water, including the Delaware River and its tributaries.

The EPA sets water quality standards for the Delaware River Basin and works with state and local agencies to monitor and enforce these standards. The agency also conducts research and provides technical assistance to help reduce pollution in the basin.

Beyond protecting downstream communities, such measures would benefit another important constituency: workers in industries that are the sources of toxic pollution. Workers in the manufacturing, agriculture, and construction sectors face some of the highest levels of exposure to toxic chemicals on a regular basis. Exposure to these chemicals can cause both acute and chronic health effects, depending on the type and level of exposure.

Acute effects can include symptoms such as headaches, dizziness, nausea, and respiratory problems. These symptoms can make it difficult for workers to perform their job duties and can lead to lost time from work. In severe cases, acute exposure can cause immediate and potentially life-threatening health effects.

Chronic exposure can lead to long-term health effects, such as cancer, reproductive problems, neurological disorders, and respiratory problems. These health effects can have a significant impact on workers' quality of life and can result in long-term disability or death.

Ideally, tighter pollution standards would encourage industries to adopt better practices that limit worker exposure — or better still, discourage companies from using hazardous chemicals altogether.

While pollution prevention strategies may protect workers, they underscore how inextricably intertwined worker and environmental protections are. This is a lesson that Americans have witnessed repeatedly in recent years, from the BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico in 2010 to the ongoing catastrophe of the toxic train derailment in East Palestine, Ohio.

It is also important given how fundamentally inadequate our major national worker protection law, the Occupational Safety and Health Act, has proven to be in protecting workers against hazardous chemicals. Until our government strengthens the act, environmental laws such as the Clean Water Act and the Toxic Substances Control Act are likely to offer the best options for safeguarding workers.

To stay up to date about this and other issues, read our blog and subscribe to our email list.

Showing 2,822 results

James Goodwin, Marcha Chaudry | March 15, 2023

Chemical Spills, Leaks, Fires, and Explosions Cry Out for Stronger Delaware River, Worker Protections

The Delaware River Basin is a vital ecosystem that provides drinking water for millions of people and supports diverse wildlife, recreation, and agriculture in Pennsylvania, New York, and New Jersey. Unfortunately, industrial activities in the basin contaminate the water with toxic pollutants, leading to a variety of negative impacts on human health and the environment and endangering industrial workers.

Marcha Chaudry | March 14, 2023

It’s Equal Pay Day. Or, Rather, Unequal Pay Day.

On average, women who work full-time earn 84 cents for every dollar that men earn. Addressing these barriers requires a multifaceted approach.

James Goodwin | March 13, 2023

Center Mounts Counteroffensive to Anti-Reg Efforts at U.S. House Hearing

The regulatory system is a vital part of our constitutional democracy; with smart reforms, it can empower the public and continue enforcing policies that make us all safer, healthier, and freer. That was the message that Member Scholars of the Center for Progressive Reform successfully conveyed during last Friday’s subcommittee hearing of the U.S. House Judiciary Committee.

Minor Sinclair | March 6, 2023

Center Taps Three New Board Members as Country Faces Unprecedented Challenges

As the Center for Progressive Reform enters our third decade of advocating for progressive policy for the public good, our country is facing wholly unprecedented challenges: A suffering climate. Unimaginable inequality and inequities that dispossess the majority. A faltering democracy. The Center is extremely gratified to have three new Board members join us and lend their deep expertise and wide range of experiences as we tackle these challenges and more.

Daniel Farber | March 2, 2023

Good News from the Land of 10,000 Lakes

The headline news is that Minnesota has adopted a 2040 deadline for a carbon-free grid. The headline is accurate, but the law in question contains a lot of other interesting features that deserve attention.

A scientist tests water quality in a marsh

Daniel Farber | March 1, 2023

Wetlands Regulation in the Political Swamp

Last December, the Biden administration issued a rule defining the scope of the federal government’s authority over streams and wetlands. Congressional Republicans vowed to overturn the rule, using a procedure created by the Congressional Review Act. If Congress is going to repeal something, it should be the Congressional Review Act rather than the Biden rule.

Richard Pierce, Jr. | February 28, 2023

Point: Ensuring Democratic Responsibility in the Administrative State

I recently accepted an invitation from Georgetown Journal of Law and Public Policy and the Pacific Legal Foundation to contribute to a symposium on “Ensuring Democratic Responsibility in the Administrative State.” I decided to begin with ideas that I borrowed from former U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice William Howard Taft and former Justice Stephen Breyer.

James Goodwin | February 28, 2023

Counterpoint: Does Centralized Regulatory Review Ensure Democratic Accountability?

In today's "point" post on this blog, Member Scholar Richard Pierce described how centralized regulatory review conducted by the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) is effective in ensuring the democratic accountability of the administrative state. In this companion post, I’ll offer a competing view of whether centralized review fulfills this objective in practice and what that means for the standards and safeguards designed to protect our health, safety, and lives.

Richard Pierce, Jr. | February 28, 2023

Rebuttal: The Benefits of Cost-Benefit Analysis

At the request of Senior Policy Analyst James Goodwin, I posted a brief summary of an essay in which I described the advantages that I see in expanding the scope of the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) and combining its use of cost-benefit analysis with some doctrines that the U.S. Supreme Court has already adopted. I did so, and Goodwin suggested pairing it with a "counterpoint" post he subsequently prepared and also gave me the opportunity to rebut that counterpoint. I do so here.