Join us.

We’re working to create a just society and preserve a healthy environment for future generations. Donate today to help.

Donate

It’s Equal Pay Day. Or, Rather, Unequal Pay Day.

While some progress has been made in recent years, women still earn less than men for similar work. 

Much less.

On average, women who work full-time earn 84 cents for every dollar that men earn, according to the American Association of University Women. In other words, women must work through today, March 14, to earn what men earned in 2022, according to the National Committee on Pay Equity, which bases its findings on the latest U.S. Census figures. 

Another way to look at it: Women have worked for free so far this year, at least when compared to men. It’s as if their labor doesn’t count. Literally. 

“Many women must work far longer into the year to catch up to men,” the committee notes on its website.

The situation is worse for women of color and moms.

Much worse.

Indeed, Some women must work until the last month of the year simply to catch up with non-Hispanic white men’s earnings the previous year, according to AAUW’s Equal Pay Calendar.

The gap translates into thousands and thousands of dollars that women don’t have but desperately need to cover the increasing costs of basic life necessities like housing, food, child care, electricity, gas, medicine, education, transportation, and more.

Multiple Causes

Several factors contribute to the gender pay gap, including:

A Multifaceted Solution

Addressing these barriers requires a multifaceted approach that includes policies such as equal pay laws, stronger anti-discrimination measures, and efforts to promote equal access to education and training opportunities for women. Additionally, promoting workplace flexibility and paid family leave policies can help support working parents, regardless of gender. 

Fortunately, some bills have been introduced in the past to address equal pay for women:

  1. The Paycheck Fairness Act: This is a federal bill that was first introduced in 1997 and has been reintroduced several times since then. The bill would strengthen the Equal Pay Act of 1963 by providing more effective remedies for victims of gender-based pay discrimination, increasing penalties for employers who violate the law, and improving the collection of pay data to identify and address pay disparities.
  1. The Fair Pay Act: This is another federal bill that has been introduced in multiple sessions of Congress. The bill would require employers to provide equal pay for work that is of equal value, regardless of gender, race, or national origin.
  1. State-level bills: Several states have introduced and passed their own equal pay bills, such as the California Fair Pay Act, the New York Equal Pay Act, and the Massachusetts Equal Pay Act. These bills typically require employers to provide equal pay for work that is substantially similar, rather than identical, and prohibit employers from retaliating against employees who discuss or inquire about their pay.

Policymakers continue to introduce legislation, often on Equal Pay Day, to call for equal pay for equal work. It’s an easy choice, and an overdue one.

Showing 2,821 results

Marcha Chaudry | March 14, 2023

It’s Equal Pay Day. Or, Rather, Unequal Pay Day.

On average, women who work full-time earn 84 cents for every dollar that men earn. Addressing these barriers requires a multifaceted approach.

James Goodwin | March 13, 2023

Center Mounts Counteroffensive to Anti-Reg Efforts at U.S. House Hearing

The regulatory system is a vital part of our constitutional democracy; with smart reforms, it can empower the public and continue enforcing policies that make us all safer, healthier, and freer. That was the message that Member Scholars of the Center for Progressive Reform successfully conveyed during last Friday’s subcommittee hearing of the U.S. House Judiciary Committee.

Minor Sinclair | March 6, 2023

Center Taps Three New Board Members as Country Faces Unprecedented Challenges

As the Center for Progressive Reform enters our third decade of advocating for progressive policy for the public good, our country is facing wholly unprecedented challenges: A suffering climate. Unimaginable inequality and inequities that dispossess the majority. A faltering democracy. The Center is extremely gratified to have three new Board members join us and lend their deep expertise and wide range of experiences as we tackle these challenges and more.

Daniel Farber | March 2, 2023

Good News from the Land of 10,000 Lakes

The headline news is that Minnesota has adopted a 2040 deadline for a carbon-free grid. The headline is accurate, but the law in question contains a lot of other interesting features that deserve attention.

A scientist tests water quality in a marsh

Daniel Farber | March 1, 2023

Wetlands Regulation in the Political Swamp

Last December, the Biden administration issued a rule defining the scope of the federal government’s authority over streams and wetlands. Congressional Republicans vowed to overturn the rule, using a procedure created by the Congressional Review Act. If Congress is going to repeal something, it should be the Congressional Review Act rather than the Biden rule.

Richard Pierce, Jr. | February 28, 2023

Point: Ensuring Democratic Responsibility in the Administrative State

I recently accepted an invitation from Georgetown Journal of Law and Public Policy and the Pacific Legal Foundation to contribute to a symposium on “Ensuring Democratic Responsibility in the Administrative State.” I decided to begin with ideas that I borrowed from former U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice William Howard Taft and former Justice Stephen Breyer.

James Goodwin | February 28, 2023

Counterpoint: Does Centralized Regulatory Review Ensure Democratic Accountability?

In today's "point" post on this blog, Member Scholar Richard Pierce described how centralized regulatory review conducted by the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) is effective in ensuring the democratic accountability of the administrative state. In this companion post, I’ll offer a competing view of whether centralized review fulfills this objective in practice and what that means for the standards and safeguards designed to protect our health, safety, and lives.

Richard Pierce, Jr. | February 28, 2023

Rebuttal: The Benefits of Cost-Benefit Analysis

At the request of Senior Policy Analyst James Goodwin, I posted a brief summary of an essay in which I described the advantages that I see in expanding the scope of the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) and combining its use of cost-benefit analysis with some doctrines that the U.S. Supreme Court has already adopted. I did so, and Goodwin suggested pairing it with a "counterpoint" post he subsequently prepared and also gave me the opportunity to rebut that counterpoint. I do so here.

Katlyn Schmitt | February 27, 2023

Advocating for Climate, Labor, and Environmental Equity in Maryland

Everyone should have a fair chance to live the healthiest life possible, but that’s not always the case for many of our communities. That's particularly true of overburdened communities that bear the brunt of pollution and toxic chemical exposures. But help may be on the way in Maryland in the form of the Climate, Labor, and Environmental Equity Act of 2023, and I testified in strong support of the bill on February 23.