Join us.

We’re working to create a just society and preserve a healthy environment for future generations. Donate today to help.

Donate

New Oxfam Report: Poultry Industry Denies Worker Requests for Bathroom Breaks

Can you imagine working for a boss who refuses you the dignity of taking a bathroom break? According to a revealing new report published today by Oxfam America, denial of bathroom breaks is a very real practice at poultry plants across the country, and line workers at these plants often "wait inordinately long times (an hour or more), then race to accomplish the task within a certain timeframe (e.g., ten minutes) or risk discipline." 

If you've never worked on an assembly or production line, you may wonder why workers need approval to use the bathroom in the first place. The processing line at a poultry plant moves rapidly, which means when one worker leaves the line, another must take his or her place to keep up with production. Typically, the employer will have a system in place for workers to signal when they need a break, and then a "relief worker" or "floater" will fill in. 

But according to Oxfam's report, No Relief: Denial of Bathroom Breaks in the Poultry Industry, poultry plants don't always employ enough relief workers for the system to function properly, resulting in workers being denied breaks to prevent disruptions on the line. In effect, as Oxfam puts it, "Workers are reduced to pieces of the machine, little more than body parts that hang, cut, trim, and load—rapidly and relentlessly." So, instead of granting requests for bathroom breaks, supervisors yell at workers, humiliate them, and threaten disciplinary action or even deportation. 

Oxfam found that workers are so fearful of losing their jobs or other adverse consequences that instead of asking for bathroom breaks, they try to eat and drink less to avoid needing to use the bathroom altogether. Current and former workers interviewed by Oxfam shared personal stories and stories of coworkers who were utterly humiliated when they accidentally urinated or defecated while standing on the processing line. Some workers started wearing diapers to avoid potential humiliation or retaliation. 

Denying workers reasonable access to the bathroom is not only an infringement on personal dignity, it is also a threat to workers' health and safety. Not using the bathroom when needed or wearing diapers can lead to urinary tract infections, and if left untreated, these can lead to serious kidney infections. Other health concerns include stomach pain, constipation, inflammation of the colon (diverticulitis), and hemorrhoids. 

For women, the risk of developing a urinary tract infection is 10 times greater than for men, and the risk is even higher for pregnant women. If a urinary tract infection progresses to a kidney infection during pregnancy, it can cause low birth weight and early labor. And the Oxfam report cites one study concluding that E. coli infections, another risk that line workers face, could also cause serious complications in pregnancy, including low birth weight, preterm birth, and miscarriage. 

When workers do get to take a bathroom break, Oxfam found they are often limited to five or ten minutes, in which they have to get to the restroom, remove their gear, use the restroom, put their gear back on, wash their hands, and return to the line. Given these time constraints, workers often have to run to the restroom, increasing their chance of injuries from falling on slippery plant floors. 

Oxfam also makes the case that denying bathroom breaks is not only bad for workers, it's also bad for business. Restricting bathroom access could increase a company's legal liability and potentially damage its reputation. Under the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's (OSHA) "sanitation standard," employers are required to provide workers access to toilet facilities promptly and without unreasonable restrictions or delays. Failure to do so is a regulatory violation subject to a fine. In fact, OSHA has recently increased its attention on the poultry industry, and in 2015, the agency cited a Delaware plant for a "serious" violation for denying bathroom breaks to its workers and proposed a $4,000 penalty. 

Oxfam argues that denying bathroom breaks may also violate U.S. anti-discrimination laws like the Americans with Disabilities Act and civil rights laws outlawing gender and sex discrimination, given that the harm is especially acute for women, especially pregnant women, and workers with disabilities. 

How can poultry companies fix this problem? Oxfam recommends a list of solutions, beginning with simply granting workers bathroom breaks when they need them. Among other things, Oxfam also recommends that companies: 

  • Develop written policies on bathroom breaks;
  • Train supervisors on company policies;
  • Conduct routine assessments on whether supervisors are complying with company policy;
  • Hire enough staff to relieve workers on the line without lengthy delays;
  • Allow workers a means of raising concerns without retaliation;
  • Investigate complaints; and
  • Regularly communicate with workers. 

The Oxfam America report is available online at https://www.oxfamamerica.org/explore/research-publications/no-relief/.

Showing 2,829 results

Katie Tracy | May 11, 2016

New Oxfam Report: Poultry Industry Denies Worker Requests for Bathroom Breaks

Can you imagine working for a boss who refuses you the dignity of taking a bathroom break? According to a revealing new report published today by Oxfam America, denial of bathroom breaks is a very real practice at poultry plants across the country, and line workers at these plants often “wait inordinately long times (an […]

Evan Isaacson | May 10, 2016

Trading Away the Benefits of Green Infrastructure

In the world of watershed restoration, there are multiple tools and tactics that government agencies, private landowners, and industry can use to reduce pollution and clean up our waterways. In Maryland, two of those approaches seem destined to collide. On the first track is nutrient trading, a least-cost pollution control concept predicated on the idea […]

James Goodwin | May 9, 2016

New Study Brings ‘Trickle Down’ Illogic to Regulatory ‘Costs’ Estimates

These days, it seems a week doesn’t go by without some conservative advocacy group releasing a new study that purports to measure the total annual costs of federal regulation. In this case, it’s literally true. Last week, the reliably anti-regulatory Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) put out its annual tally, provocatively titled “Ten Thousand Commandments,” which […]

Dave Owen | May 5, 2016

The Surprising Evolution of Federal Stream Protections

Originally published on Environmental Law Prof Blog by CPR Member Scholar Dave Owen. Right now, the United States' second-most-heated environmental controversy—behind only the Clean Power Plan—involves the Clean Water Rule, which seeks to clarify the scope of federal regulatory jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act. According to its many opponents, the rule is one big power grab. […]

Brian Gumm | May 4, 2016

New Paper: Americans Hurt By Forced Arbitration Agreements with Big Banks, Credit Card Companies

NEWS RELEASE: New Paper Shows Americans Hurt By Forced Arbitration Agreements with Big Banks, Credit Card Companies Forthcoming Rule from Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Offers Some Solutions, but More Can Be Done to Protect Consumers Opening a checking account or using a credit card is an essential, everyday activity for many Americans, but most financial […]

Daniel Farber | May 3, 2016

The Misleading Argument Against Delegation

It’s commonplace to say that agencies engage in lawmaking when they issue rules. Conservatives denounce this as a violation of the constitutional scheme; liberals celebrate it as an instrument of modern government. Both sides agree that in reality, though not in legal form, Congress has delegated its lawmaking power to agencies. But this is mistaking […]

James Goodwin | May 2, 2016

How Conservatives Sell Off the Federal Budget, Bit by Bit, to the Highest Bidder

Once upon a time, congressional conservatives pretended to care about the appearance, if not the reality, of corruption afflicting the federal budgeting process. Strangely, they chose to act on their sanctimonious outrage by banning earmarks – or legislative instructions that direct federal agencies to spend appropriated funds on certain specified projects – while leaving the […]

William Andreen | April 29, 2016

Climate Change Increases Need for Reform of Nonpoint Source Pollution and Stream Flow Approaches

The Clean Water Act has been a success in many ways. The discharge of pollutants from both industrial and municipal point sources has plummeted, the loss of wetlands has been cut decisively, and water quality has improved broadly across the entire nation. Despite all of that progress, many of our waters remain impaired. The primary […]

James Goodwin | April 28, 2016

CPR’s Mintz Outlines Flaws of House Bill That Would Undercut SEPs

Center for Progressive Reform Member Scholar Joel Mintz submitted written testimony to the House Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial, and Antitrust Law ahead of its hearing this morning on yet another ill-advised bill, the misleadingly named “Stop Settlement Funds Slush Funds Act of 2016.” The bill would place arbitrary limits on how the […]