Join us.

We’re working to create a just society and preserve a healthy environment for future generations. Donate today to help.

Donate

Hispanic Heritage Month and Climate and Environmental Justice

This post is the first in a series.

To recognize Hispanic Heritage Month this year, the Center for Progressive Reform asked Latino leaders in the environmental justice and climate movement to share personal reflections about their heritage and their work on a wide range of cross-cutting, intersectional issues that disproportionately affect Hispanic and Latino populations.

As part of this series, Jenny Hernandez from GreenLatinos, Jose Coronado Flores from CASA de Maryland, and Amy Tamayo from Alianza Nacional de Campesinas also shared calls to action for allied organizations to support solutions that empower Hispanic and Latino communities. But for our first post, we’d like to reflect on the contributions of Latino and Hispanic communities to struggles for climate justice.

The observance of Hispanic Heritage began as Hispanic Heritage Week in 1968 under President Lyndon B. Johnson and was expanded by President Ronald Reagan in 1988 to one month, running from September 15 to October 15. The month includes the anniversaries of the independence of several Latin American countries, including Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, and Nicaragua (September 15), Mexico (September 16), and Chile (September 18). It now also includes Latina Equal Pay Day (October 3), Indigenous People’s Day (October 12), and LGBT+ History Month (October).  

It is important to note that the term “Hispanic” — used for the first time in the 1970 U.S. Census — is a misnomer. It has had the harmful effect of excluding and erasing many distinct identities, particularly Indigenous ones, as some, but not all, Latinos share a colonial history with Europe and Spain. It is also worth pointing out that attempts to represent Hispanic and Latino communities as a monolithic group are inaccurate. 

In the next census in 2030, revisions to statistical data categories announced by the Office of Management and Budget will use one combined question for race and ethnicity and encourage respondents to select multiple options. The lack of specific categories obscures social, economic, environmental, and health disparities that are more pronounced among different ethnic groups of Latinos, including Afro-Latinos and non-Spanish speaking Latinos who speak Indigenous languages and dialects. More data disaggregation is needed to identify these and other disparities within the Latino community. 

Nevertheless, this month is an opportunity to reflect on this history and celebrate the role of Latinos in the United States for their contributions, particularly in the labor, environmental justice, and climate movements. 

Hispanic and Latino, Black, and Indigenous organizers continue to be at the forefront of progressive movements in the United States. Working-class Hispanic and Latino leaders have won victories — stronger unions, protections for workers, and safer and cleaner air, land, and water — that benefit all Americans. Dolores Huerta may be one of the better known figures, but there are many whose work remains obscure and unrecognized. 

Hispanic and Latino communities in the U.S. include people born within its borders, others born elsewhere, and descendants of Indigenous people who are native to North, Central, and South America. Some are from families who have been in the United States for multiple generations — some six or more — while others are recent immigrants. The 65 million Latinos in the United States make up 19 percent of the total population and are the second largest racial or ethnic group in the country. Between 2022 and 2023, Latinos accounted for 71 percent of overall population growth in the United States, and this growth will continue even if immigration decreases.  

Despite this, there have been persistent attempts to mischaracterize the existence of Hispanics and Latinos in the United States as “illegal” and to blame communities on the receiving end of bad housing, economic, and social policies — rather than the supporters of those policies — for political gain. These misconceptions also ignore a crucial part of 21st century immigration narratives: recent immigrants, not just from Latin America but from everywhere in the world, are fleeing (sometimes forcibly) the catastrophic impacts of climate change, including drought, extreme storms, and destabilized economies, that have been driven almost exclusively by the “developed nations” who are now keeping them from seeking safety. 

Latino communities also live on the frontlines of pollution and climate change, and Latino children are 3 times more likely to live in nature-deprived areas with polluted air than are white children. Latinos also represent the largest share of the essential and high-risk workers, in sectors like construction, outdoor agricultural work, and manufacturing, and they are overrepresented in heat-related deaths and workplace accidents — such as the recent collapse of the Francis Scott Key bridge in Baltimore, Maryland, which killed six workers.

This precarity is why Latinos are disproportionately affected by undemocratic and backward policies like Project 2025, which, among many things, seeks to strip workers of their civil rights, including the right to unionize. State laws that seek to make working conditions even more dangerous also disproportionately affect Latinos, including laws in Texas and Florida attempting to eliminate mandated water breaks for outdoor workers.

But firsthand experience of the impacts of climate change and a deep connection to nature are part of the lived experience and collective consciousness of Hispanic and Latino communities.

It is no coincidence that Latinos consistently have the highest rates of awareness about climate change. In the 2024 election, Latinos will be the second largest voting group by race after white voters, representing 30-50 million eligible voters, or 14 percent of the vote. Approximately every 30 seconds, a Latino in the United States turns 18 and becomes eligible to vote. 

Here at the Center, public protections, regulatory democracy, and climate justice are the foundations of our research and advocacy. This September, we participated with many other Latino Climate justice leaders in the 2024 Hispanic Health Summit, “Fortaleciendo Nuestra Salud,” hosted by Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra, himself the son of farmworkers, whose agency has been spearheading climate justice and public health initiatives

The strength of our democracy and democratic institutions is inextricably linked to successful outcomes for Latinos, who will continue to lead and build upon the sacrifices and contributions of previous generations to continue advancing social, economic, and environmental justice.

Check back for additional posts in this series.

Showing 2,825 results

Catalina Gonzalez | October 28, 2024

Hispanic Heritage Month and Climate and Environmental Justice

To recognize Hispanic Heritage Month this year, the Center for Progressive Reform asked Latino leaders in the environmental justice and climate movement to share personal reflections about their heritage and their work on a wide range of cross-cutting, intersectional issues that disproportionately affect Hispanic and Latino populations.

air pollution

Daniel Farber | October 24, 2024

Six Sleeper Proposals in Project 2025

The Project 2025 report is 920 pages long, but only a few portions have gotten much public attention. The report’s significance is precisely that it goes beyond a few headline proposals to set a comprehensive agenda for a second Trump administration. There are dozens of significant proposals relating to energy and the environment. Although I can’t talk about all of them here, I want to flag a few of these sleeper provisions. They involve reduced protection for endangered species, eliminating energy efficiency rules, blocking new transmission lines, changing electricity regulation to favor fossil fuels, weakening air pollution rules, and encouraging sale of gas guzzlers.

Robin Kundis Craig | October 15, 2024

San Francisco Is Suing the EPA over How Specific Water Pollution Permits Should Be

The U.S. Supreme Court will test how flexible the EPA and states can be in regulating water pollution under the Clean Water Act when it hears oral argument in City and County of San Francisco v. Environmental Protection Agency on October 16. This case asks the court to decide whether federal regulators can issue permits that are effectively broad orders not to violate water quality standards, or instead may only specify the concentrations of individual pollutants that permit holders can release into water bodies.

Alice Kaswan, Catalina Gonzalez | October 9, 2024

Incorporating Environmental Justice in State Climate Planning, with Lessons from California

Around the country, in blue states and red, policymakers are engaging in climate action planning, guided by a far-seeing Inflation Reduction Act funding program — the Carbon Pollution Reduction Grant (CPRG) program — which has devoted $250 million to state, metropolitan, and Tribal planning efforts. A new report from the Center for Progressive Reform, Environmental Justice in State Climate Planning: Learning from California, offers critical insights to help policymakers and advocates working on these plans translate climate goals into action and advance environmental justice.

Joseph Tomain | September 24, 2024

The Postliberal Apocalypse: Reviewing American Apocalypse: The Six Far-Right Groups Waging War on Democracy

T.S. Eliot was wrong. April is not the “cruellest month.” June is. In slightly over two weeks at the end of June 2024, the United States Supreme Court made mass murder easier, criminalized homelessness, partially decriminalized insurrection, ignored air pollution and climate change by curtailing agency actions, made it more difficult to fine securities and investment frauds, and deregulated political corruption while failing to affirmatively protect women with possibly fatal pregnancies. To this list, add the Court’s July 1, 2024, ruling effectively giving Donald Trump a pathway to an authoritarian presidency by delaying his criminal trials and then, as extralegal protection, effectively immunizing him from the worst of possible crimes. How did we get here? Rena Steinzor's new book, American Apocalypse, makes an important contribution to the literature examining the Right by bringing together several movements that have landed us where we are today.

James Goodwin | September 19, 2024

The Right Has an Authoritarian Vision of the Administrative State. Now It’s Time for a Progressive Alternative.

A government that recognizes that it has an affirmative responsibility to address social and economic harms that threaten the stability of our democracy. An empowered and well-resourced administrative state that helps carry out this responsibility by, among other things, collaborating with affected members of the public, particularly members of structurally marginalized communities, while marshaling its own independent expertise. We believe that these are some of the core principles that should make up a progressive vision of an administrative state.

Sophie Loeb | September 17, 2024

New Policy Brief Urges Public Utilities Commissions to Rise to the Clean Energy Challenge

On September 17, the Center for Progressive Reform published a new policy brief, Rising to the Challenge: How State Public Utilities Commissions Can Use the Inflation Reduction Act to Advance Clean Energy. This brief examines the ability of public utilities commissions (PUCs) to incorporate Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) funding into their energy planning processes in order to expand the uptake of renewable energy resources at a lower cost to consumers.

Minor Sinclair, Spencer Green | September 12, 2024

Announcing Three New Member Scholars at the Center for Progressive Reform

The summer of 2024 will be remembered for many things, but here at the Center for Progressive Reform, what most struck us was that it was the year that the administrative state broke through into public consciousness. From the unexpected virality of, and backlash against, Project 2025 — a massive right-wing legal manifesto as aggressive as it was arcane — to the Supreme Court regulatory rulings that made headlines for weeks, this year’s political news drove home that the work we do to protect the environment, the workforce, and public health matters very much to we, the people when these things are under attack. In this context, we approach the task of inviting new members to join us in our work with seriousness, but also with much excitement. This spring, we reviewed nearly two dozen exceptional candidates from the fields of law and public policy. Today, we are pleased to announce that we have a cohort of three excellent scholars to add to our ranks.

Grayson Lanza | August 8, 2024

CAFO Lagoons in North Carolina: A Case Study in Advocacy and State Administrative Law

Eastern North Carolina’s landscape is pocked with artificial lagoons holding a noxious liquid that causes suffering both for local residents and the global climate. The liquid? Hog manure, held in giant, open-air pits that are used by large-scale industrial facilities called concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs), In CAFOs, operators raise large numbers of animals in confined spaces that allow for easier feeding and waste management — and higher profits.