Join us.
We’re working to create a just society and preserve a healthy environment for future generations. Donate today to help.
Filter by Issue
Filter by Topic
Filter by Content Type
Filter by Author
Showing 1 results
Sort by Date: Newest First Date: Oldest First
Robert M. Hagan Endowed Chair for Water Resources Management and Policy
Karrigan Bork, Steph Tai, Thomas Harter | May 1, 2020
Last week, the Supreme Court decided a case involving discharge from a wastewater reclamation facility owned and operated by the County of Maui, which discharged 3 to 5 million gallons of treated wastewater per day into four injection wells about half a mile from the ocean. Recent research showed that much of the injected waste eventually discharges to the ocean. Environmental groups sued the county for not obtaining a Clean Water Act permit, arguing that point source discharge of pollutants that eventually reach surface water is governed under the Act. Justice Breyer, writing for the Court majority, wrote "we do not see how Congress could have intended to create such a large and obvious loop hole in one of the key regulatory innovations of the Clean Water Act." On the "fairly traceable" approach, the opinion stated that such interpretation "would require a permit in surprising, even bizarre circumstances".