Seven Bright Spots of 2018

Daniel Farber

Dec. 31, 2018

A version of this post was originally published on Legal Planet.

Yes, it was a grim year in many ways. But there actually were some bright spots. Here are just the high points.

  1. Scott Pruitt. Pruitt resigned under fire. While his successor may be more successful in some ways, the fact remains that Pruitt was a disgrace. We're better off without him. Trump was apparently unfazed by his incompetence and aversion to hard work. But the succession of scandals and investigations – about personal travel at government expense, extravagance, the top-secret phone booth in his office, and so on and so on – eventually got to be too much of a distraction that threatened to undermine Trump's own monopoly on the spotlight.  
  2. Ryan Zinke. Yet another bad apple who was forced out. His acting replacement is equally wrong-headed and more competent but has multiple conflicts of interest that require him to recuse himself from many disputes. Which is probably a good thing.  
  3. Judicial rulings. The Trump administration continued to have a terrible record in court on environmental issues. According to Brookings, the administration's record is now one in eighteen. Apart from losing litigation over its efforts to postpone Obama-era rules without obeying the proper procedures, the administration also lost a couple of efforts to defend Obama-era efforts, resulting in mandates that it take regulatory action.  
  4. States. As I blogged previously, some states have responded to Trump by redoubling their commitments to addressing climate change. California and New York led the list, but they're far from the only ones. Just this month, nine Northeastern states and the District of Columbia agreed to create a cap-and-trade system for the transportation sector, and D.C. also created a 100 percent renewable mandate for 2032.  
  5. Regulations. Some Trump administration proposals have been derailed. That includes Rick Perry's efforts to justify subsidies for coal plants, either based on their supposed contribution to grid resiliency or as needed for national security. The administration seems to be powerless to halt the steady stream of coal power plant closures by utilities eager to shed uneconomic plants and modernize their operations.  
  6. 2018 elections. The Democrats retook the House and picked up seven governorships. Winning the House will allow genuine oversight of the administration for the first time, and governors can lead the charge on renewables.  
  7. The private sector. Like states, leading corporations from Apple to Wal-Mart are continuing to pursue renewable energy goals. And Ford and GM parted company with the administration on all or part of the rollback of CAFE full efficiency standards. Utilities in many states, red as well as blue, are investing enormous sums to modernize their grids in order to prepare for the new regime of solar and wind power. Meanwhile, basic economics is continuing to squeeze out coal-fired power plants, and renewables are becoming competitive even with natural gas.

Let's hope for more good news in 2019.

Read More by Daniel Farber
Tagged with:
renewable energy 2018
More on CPR's Work & Scholars.
Jan. 26, 2022

Slate Op-Ed: The Supreme Court's Plan to Block Climate Action We Haven't Even Taken Yet

Jan. 21, 2022

Key Federal Agency Takes Steps to Protect Public Lands, Curb Climate Change

Jan. 13, 2022

Will the 30 x 30 Initiative Protect 30 Percent of Freshwater Resources by 2030?

Jan. 12, 2022

States Should Act to Protect People and Our Environment from Unregulated Chemical Tanks

Jan. 6, 2022

The Quagmire of Clean Water Act Jurisdiction

Dec. 20, 2021

Democracy, Rulemaking, and Outpourings of Comments

Dec. 9, 2021

CPR, Partners Call for Climate Justice Reforms to the Chemical Industry