Steinzor Reacts to SCOTUS Chesapeake Bay Case

Rena Steinzor

Feb. 29, 2016

The Supreme Court today denied certiorari in a case challenging the watershed-wide effort led by the EPA to reduce pollution flowing into the Chesapeake Bay. The Court's action leaves standing a lower court ruling upholding the effort. CPR Member Scholar Rena Steinzor, Professor of Law at the University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law, issued the following reaction:

"The Supreme Court's decision is a milestone victory for the restoration of the Chesapeake Bay and the thousands of local waters in the Bay watershed. Today's decision should at last put an end to any efforts to evade responsibility for reducing nutrient and sediment pollution. The Bay cleanup effort still has a very long way to go, with a lot of tough decisions and hard work ahead, but the Court's ruling should give hope to the millions of people in this region who have had to live with degraded and polluted waters for decades. Moreover, the decision is a clear affirmation of the plain meaning of the Clean Water Act and EPA's authority to enforce it. As the Farm Bureau has argued, it has nationwide implications."

Read More by Rena Steinzor
CPR HOMEPAGE
More on CPR's Work & Scholars.
May 4, 2022

Clarifying the Congressional Review Act

May 2, 2022

Taking the Supreme Court's Temperature on Global Warming

April 27, 2022

New Report: Democratizing Our Regulatory System Is More Important Than Ever. Can FERC Lead the Way?

April 26, 2022

HBO Max Series Highlights Need for Stronger Regulation of Cosmetics Industry

April 25, 2022

Biden Undoes NEPA Rollback

April 22, 2022

The Clean Water Act's Midlife Crisis

April 21, 2022

Protecting Future Generations, Just as Earlier Ones Sought to Protect Us