OSHA's New Silica Rule: CPR's Matt Shudtz Reacts

Matt Shudtz

March 24, 2016

Decades in the making, OSHA’s new silica rule will better protect millions of workers from a highly toxic, cancer-causing substance that has killed thousands while the rule slowly worked its way through the regulatory gauntlet, administration after administration. Today, in quarries, foundries, building sites, and kitchen rehab jobs across the country, workers can look forward to breathing cleaner air.

But today’s announcement is far from the end of the story. Next comes the inevitable litigation. Following their tired playbook, special interest groups will beg a court to put a hold on the rule, hoping to delay or undo it. Workers have waited long enough for this rule. It is high time industry made an investment in the future by establishing the protections this rule requires. Investing now in tools and policies to better protect workers will save hundreds of lives every year. That’s not just a number; these are real people who will not have to suffer the pain and indignity of gasping for breath simply because they went to work at a job where the hazards of silica dust were ignored because OSHA’s outdated standard required so little of their employers.

Ed. Note: Watch this space for a more thorough review of the rule's provisions.

Read More by Matt Shudtz
Posted in:
CPR HOMEPAGE
More on CPR's Work & Scholars.
June 23, 2022

Member Scholar Buzbee Leads Congressional Amicus in Crucial Supreme Court Clean Water Act Case

June 23, 2022

Justices Overturn Washington Workers' Compensation Law on a Strict Reading of Intergovernmental Immunity

June 22, 2022

Mapping the Future: California Weighs Pathways to Carbon Neutrality

June 22, 2022

Addressing Overburdened, Underserved Communities' Priorities Is Vital to Success of California Climate Plan

June 17, 2022

The Supreme Court's Demolition Agenda

June 14, 2022

Member Scholars Take Center Stage in Prestigious Environmental Law Anthology

June 9, 2022

Whose Interests Count? And How Much?