Join us.

We’re working to create a just society and preserve a healthy environment for future generations. Donate today to help.

Donate

Women’s History Month Q&A with Member Scholar Hannah Wiseman

Hannah Wiseman

To commemorate Women’s History Month, we’re interviewing women at the Center for Progressive Reform about how they’re building a more just America, whether by pursuing a just transition to clean energy, protections for food workers, or legal support for American Indians. This week, we spoke with Hannah Wiseman, a professor at Penn State University who teaches and writes about energy and environmental law and land use regulation. 

CPR: What motivated you to become an expert in energy law and a voice for a just energy transition in the United States? Is there historical context to this or a moment in history that stood out to you as motivation or inspiration? 

HW: When I was working in Texas in 2008, two types of energy development were booming: hydraulic fracturing (“fracking”) for natural gas (“gas”) and wind energy. It became clear that we were at a major transition point. We could choose continued reliance on fossil fuels or we could substantially ramp up renewable energy. It turns out that in the United States, we chose both. We became the world’s largest oil and gas producer due to fracking, and we also greatly expanded renewables, but not by enough.

One benefit of the natural gas boom is that it has weaned us off of coal, and gas provides a backup to intermittent renewables. But we’re again at a turning point — and a critical one. With battery storage now more feasible and affordable, it’s time to substantially wean ourselves off of gas and make renewables the primary source of U.S. power. We’ve long called natural gas a “bridge” fuel to more sustainable forms of power, and it’s time to be moving toward the other side of the bridge. 

CPR: What do you see as the highest priority in this field and what are the barriers to change?

HW: The highest priority in this field, as this country undergoes a rapid and major transition toward lower-carbon energy forms, is to engage with the communities with the highest energy burdens — communities in which energy makes up a large percentage of people’s budget. 

In these communities, people often have to choose between paying the electricity or fuel bill and buying medicine or food for their children. We need the energy opportunities being created now — weatherization and other energy efficiency projects, rooftop solar, and so on — to flow to these communities. We need to engage these communities to better understand how cleaner energy can help them, and we need to expand clean energy projects in these communities first. 

CPR: How does/might your work affect women in particular? Are there inequities you’ve witnessed that you’re working to change?

HW: Many single mothers face the highest energy burdens and have to make unthinkable and unacceptable choices among heat, electricity, food, and medicine for their children. 

With respect to the field of energy in general, there are a huge number of women working in the energy space now. I hear from my senior colleagues that they used to be outnumbered by men; now it’s common to have energy events where women are in the majority. I am the beneficiary of the women who paved the way ahead of me.

CPR: If you could have Congress or President Biden’s ear for an afternoon, what would you recommend? 

HW: I would recommend pushing even harder to expand low-carbon energy, but focusing even more heavily on small-scale measures that can directly benefit low-income residents. These measures include, for example, weatherization of apartment buildings and the construction of rooftop solar panels on these buildings. 

CPR: Who inspires you?

HW: Alexandra Klass [a CPR Member Scholar] and Hari Osofsky [Dean of Penn State Law and the Penn State School of International Affairs], who have long served as mentors to me and, more recently, co-authors; Shalanda Baker [CPR Member Scholar on leave to serve in the Biden administration]; Greta Thunberg [youth climate activist]; Audrey Zibelman [former chair of the New York Public Service Commission and current CEO of the primary grid operator in Australia].

CPR: Who in particular would benefit from the policy reform you seek? 

HW: If federal, state, and local green energy efforts focused even more heavily on local low-carbon projects, including community solar and wind, subsidized rooftop and parking lot solar, and energy efficiency measures, these could directly lower working single mothers’ energy bills. But these programs must be targeted properly. Historically, energy efficiency and rooftop solar have tended to focus on homes. But many people with high energy burdens live in apartments, not single family homes. 

Showing 2,834 results

Hannah Wiseman, Maggie Dewane | March 5, 2021

Women’s History Month Q&A with Member Scholar Hannah Wiseman

To commemorate Women’s History Month, we’re interviewing women at the Center for Progressive Reform about how they’re building a more just America.

Sidney A. Shapiro | March 3, 2021

The Hill Op-ed: Attention, Lawmakers — Regulation Is More Popular Than You Think

Amid the Sturm und Drang (storm and stress) of politics these days, one fact stands out — a large majority of Americans want more regulatory protection in a wide variety of areas, according to a recent poll of likely voters. The results are consistent with previous polls that indicate that Americans understand the importance of government regulation in protecting them from financial and health risks beyond their control. They also indicate majority support for efforts by the Biden administration to renew government regulation — as well as a stark repudiation of former President Trump’s extreme anti-regulatory agenda.

Daniel Farber | March 2, 2021

Recalculating the Cost of Climate Change

"The social cost of carbon" isn't exactly a household phrase. It's an estimate of the harm caused by emitting a ton of carbon dioxide over the many decades it remains in the atmosphere. That's an important factor in calculating the costs and benefits of climate regulations. For an arcane concept, it has certainly caused a lot of controversy. The Obama administration came up with a set of estimates, which Trump then slashed by 90 percent. In an early executive order, Biden created a task force to revisit the issue. Last week, the task force issued its first report. It's an impressive effort given that Biden is barely a month into his presidency. The document provides a clear overview of the ways in which climate science and climate economics have advanced since the Obama estimates and makes the case for rejecting the Trump administration's revisions. At least one federal court has already rejected those revisions, as well.

Katlyn Schmitt | March 1, 2021

Achieving Meaningful Accountability for Polluters in Maryland

Businesses that violate environmental laws and permits damage our air, land, and water, sometimes irreparably. Yet too often, these polluters aren't held accountable for harming the environment and public health. In Maryland, state officials don't respond to all violations, and, when they do, they aren't always successful. Even when they are successful, fines and other penalties don't necessarily result in behavior change. As a result, Maryland polluters are largely off the hook for the "externalities" of doing business.

Daniel Farber | February 26, 2021

Three Ways of Dodging Responsibility

In the wake of the Texas blackouts, we're seeing a number of familiar moves to deflect blame by the usual suspects -- politicians, regulators, and CEOs. These evasive tactics all begin with a core truth: Eliminating all risk is impossible and would be too expensive even if it weren't. But then they spin that truth in various ways. The result is to obscure responsibility for the disaster and the steps that should be taken going forward.

Allison Stevens | February 25, 2021

Clean Water Is a Human Right. Let’s Start Treating It Like One.

Seven years ago, public officials in cash-strapped Flint, Michigan, cut city costs by tapping the Flint River as a source of public drinking water. So began the most egregious example of environmental injustice in recent U.S. history, according to Paul Mohai, a founder of the movement for environmental justice and a professor at the University of Michigan School for Environment and Sustainability.

Robert Verchick | February 24, 2021

Baton Rouge Advocate Op-ed: Louisiana Should Get Serious About Its Climate Crisis

Since I began serving on Louisiana’s Climate Initiatives Task Force, charged with finding a way to zero out net greenhouse-gas emissions by 2050, there is one question I get from people more than any other: "C'mon, are you serious?" It's not that Louisianans don't see the need. Sea-level rise could soon swallow our coast, and hurricanes souped up by climate change are now the new normal. The problem is how we see ourselves. Louisiana, I'm reminded, is an oil-and-gas state. Whatever were we thinking? My quick response is Louisiana is really an energy state, with more sun and offshore wind than most of our peers.

Richard E. Levy, Robert L. Glicksman | February 23, 2021

The Hill Op-ed: Biden Has the Power to Restore Good Governance

Since taking office, President Biden has pursued an active agenda to address many urgent matters that require his prompt attention. We hope one important initiative does not get lost in transition: restoring the norms of good governance.

Alexandra Klass | February 22, 2021

Lessons from the Texas Grid Disaster: Planning and Investing for a Different Future

It is now a week out from the start of the massive Texas grid failure that has resulted in numerous deaths; millions of people plunged into darkness; scores of communities without clean water or heat in record cold temperatures; and billions of dollars in catastrophic damage to homes, businesses and the physical infrastructure that supports them. Critical questions surround the causes of this massive disaster and how to plan for the future so that a tragedy of this scale does not happen again.