At midnight on April 13, Maryland’s 2021 legislative session closed out with the passage of a law (House Bill 1069) that will provide meaningful drinking water protections for tenants who rely on well water. The measure, sponsored by Del. Vaughn Stewart (D-Montgomery County), passed with bipartisan support in the Maryland Senate but faced hurdles in the House due to a last-minute filibuster attempt.
Public drinking water is regularly monitored and tested to meet certain safety standards set out by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) through the Safe Drinking Water Act. The safety of drinking water from a private well or smaller community system, on the other hand, is solely up to the owner of that well or system.
In CPR’s recent report, fellow Policy Analyst Darya Minovi and I found that Maryland lags far behind most states in terms of protections for well owners and users, who make up about a third of Maryland’s overall population. The report assessed 10 key policies and programs that states have implemented to protect private well owners and found that Maryland is one of five states with the fewest protections.
The report, which also assessed nitrate contamination in groundwater on Maryland’s Lower Eastern Shore, also found that the health of Maryland well users is at risk — especially given that many residents may not be aware of the importance of regularly testing their well water.
To protect the health of roughly 2 million Marylanders, Stewart introduced House Bill 1069. In a recent hearing on the measure, he said, “Safe drinking water is a basic right, and we’ve got to ensure that all Marylanders have access to it. This bill is a small and sensible step in that direction.”
While the original bill was intended to establish a broader well safety program to protect all well users and owners, it was ultimately amended to reduce the measure’s potential cost.
New Protections
Maryland’s new law requires landlords to:
The law comes with a civil penalty of up to $1,000 for landlords who fail to comply. It also requires MDE to submit a report to the General Assembly regarding any reports of contamination it receives.
This common-sense legislation seeks to protect renters or tenants who may not have control over the safety of their homes’ water supply but suffer the health consequences of possible contamination.
While this is a great win for Maryland tenants, the state must do more to provide safeguards for every person who relies on well water. Maryland legislators have expressed support for exploring a broader program in upcoming years. During a key Maryland Senate Education, Health, and Environmental Affairs Committee meeting, Chairman Paul Pinsky (D-Prince George’s County) voted in support of the measure with the idea to “entertain even sharper, tighter, more aggressive stuff in the next year or the year after.” He went on to say that without the passage of House Bill 1069, “harm might be taking place.”
Sen. Obie Patterson (D-Prince George’s County) conveyed that the measure did not go far enough in protecting tenants, but he ultimately voted in support of the bill “with the penalty and the fact that we are going to make this a top priority next year.”
Sen. Katie Fry Hester (D-Howard and Carroll Counties), who has been vocal in her support of the bill, stated, “At this point we have nothing. There is no reporting of private well water for renters. ... This is a huge problem in the state. So I fully support this bill as a first step toward protecting people’s health.”
With the passage of this bill, Maryland joins New Jersey, Connecticut, Florida, and Maine in providing key drinking water protections for renters who rely on well water.
Showing 2,817 results
Katlyn Schmitt | April 13, 2021
At midnight on April 13, Maryland’s 2021 legislative session closed out with the passage of House Bill 1069 that will provide meaningful drinking water protections for tenants who rely on well water.
Sarah Krakoff | April 6, 2021
A citizen of the Laguna Pueblo, Deborah Haaland is the first Native American woman to serve as Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior. Haaland will oversee the federal agencies that manage nearly 480 million acres of federal public lands, while the head of the U.S. Forest Service in the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) manages the remaining 190 million acres. Haaland and her colleague, Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack, have a tall double-order ahead. In his flurry of first-day executive orders, President Joe Biden announced the entwined goals of addressing racial, economic, and other forms of injustice, as well as tackling the country’s most serious environmental challenges.
Daniel Farber | April 5, 2021
Last Friday, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals issued an important decision in a lawsuit against the oil industry. New York City had sued oil companies for harms relating to climate change. The appeals court ordered the case dismissed, on the ground that any harm relating to fossil fuels is exclusively regulated by the Clean Air Act. The ruling is a setback for the plaintiffs in similar cases, though how much of a setback remains to be seen.
Minor Sinclair | April 2, 2021
A federal district court judge in Minnesota ruled that the USDA acted arbitrarily and capriciously when it eliminated line speed limits vacated the Trump-era rule, showing that there is a limit to high line speeds — and corporate rapaciousness.
Maxine A Burkett, Minor Sinclair | March 31, 2021
To commemorate Women’s History Month, we’re interviewing women at the Center for Progressive Reform about how they’re building a more just America. This week, we're speaking with Member Scholar Maxine Burkett.
Daniel Farber | March 30, 2021
Coal- and gas-fired power plants are a major source of U.S. carbon emissions. The Obama administration devised a perfectly sensible, moderate policy to cut those emissions. The Trump administration replaced it with a ridiculous token policy. The D.C. Circuit appeals court tossed that out. Now what?
Laurie Ristino, Maggie Dewane | March 26, 2021
To commemorate Women’s History Month, we’re interviewing women at the Center for Progressive Reform about how they’re building a more just America. This week, we're speaking with Board Member Laurie Ristino.
Daniel Farber | March 25, 2021
If you ask Supreme Court experts what keeps them up at night, the answer is likely to be the non-delegation doctrine. If you are among the 99.9 percent of Americans who've never heard of it, here's an explainer of the doctrine and what the 6-3 Court might do with it.
James Goodwin | March 24, 2021
In a little-noticed move on Day One, President Joe Biden issued a memo designed to institute a more progressive process for developing new regulations. Such an effort is essential, given that timely, effective regulations will play a key role in achieving Biden-Harris administration's policy agenda. To succeed, however, it must also tackle the conservative philosophy that guides our government's rulemaking process.