Join us.

We’re working to create a just society and preserve a healthy environment for future generations. Donate today to help.

Donate

County Prosecutor in Washington State Indicts Construction Company Owner for Trench Collapse Death

On the morning of January 26, 2016, Seattle police were called to a construction site where a worker, Harold Felton, was trapped in a collapsed trench. By the time officers arrived, the rescue operation had turned into a recovery; Felton, 36, had died at the scene. 

Felton was working as part of a two-man team employed by Alki Construction to replace a sewer line. According to the police report, 10 minutes before the trench collapsed, the man working alongside Felton had moved to another area about 40 feet away to work on another part of the pipe. He heard a worrisome clunk that he thought sounded like tools hitting the pipe, so he went to check on Felton. Unable to find him, he immediately started digging and made a call to his employer and Alki's owner, Phillip Numrich, who had left the worksite to buy lunch. Numrich instructed him to call the police, then headed back to the worksite, where he and the worker continued to dig in an attempt to rescue Felton until first responders arrived at the scene and recovered Felton's body.   

In the immediate aftermath of the tragedy, according to the police report, Numrich suggested to police that Felton was to blame for his own death, saying, "He must have fallen in the hole. That's the only thing that makes sense. He knew not to go in there. He knew to stay two feet back. Those are the rules." Later that day, Numrich went to Felton's family home, where he gave Felton's father-in-law a different explanation according to the police report. Felton's father-in-law told police that when he asked Numrich why Felton was in the trench, Numrich said he "probably went into the hole to urinate, explaining that in construction you have to go somewhere, and you can't go into houses when you're covered in dirt." 

Despite Numrich's efforts to blame Felton, the truth is that Numrich had sent Felton into a trench that lacked a variety of required safeguards. A Washington Department of Labor and Industries investigation found Numrich had willfully violated safety rules requiring safeguards to prevent trenches from collapsing – the kind of collapse that claimed Felton's life. In fact, investigators discovered three unsecured trenches at the site between four and seven feet in depth that posed a risk of caving in. Alki Construction was also cited for multiple serious violations, including for not having provided so much as a ladder in the trench to allow workers to safely exit. Numrich was cited for another serious violation for having no formal accident prevention program in place to train workers about safety hazards and how to mitigate them. 

The department further concluded that none of this was a surprise to Numrich. He had control of the site, had knowledge of the hazards to workers and himself while inside the trench in the event of a cave-in (crushing and/or death by asphyxiation), and had time to discover and correct the hazards but did not. 

Because of these numerous violations, the Washington Department of Labor and Industries assessed $51,500 in fines. Rather than accept responsibility and pay the fines, Numrich contested the citations. Ultimately, the fines were halved to $25,750, a common and lamentable practice in cases of workplace safety violations. 

The modest fines did not dissuade King County prosecutors from conducting a criminal investigation. Employers in the construction industry know all too well the dangers of trench collapses and the high probability of death should one occur while a worker is inside. (A cubic yard of dry soil weighs about one ton; wet soil is even heavier.) As a Labor and Industries official put it, "This company knew what the safety risks and requirements were, and ignored them." With that in mind, and after a thorough investigation into the incident, prosecutors charged Numrich with manslaughter in the second degree, a felony offense, and a violation of labor safety regulations resulting in a worker's death, a gross misdemeanor. The felony offense carries a maximum penalty of 10 years imprisonment and a $20,000 fine; however, under the Washington Sentencing Reform Act, because Numrich doesn't have a criminal history, he's facing a maximum of 27 months imprisonment if convicted. The gross misdemeanor charge carries a punishment of a fine up to $100,000 and/or up to six months imprisonment. 

At Numrich's arraignment earlier this month, prosecutors asked for bail to be set at $20,000 and for the court to issue a no-contact order between Numrich and Harold Felton's family, as well as between Numrich and the other witness who was working with Felton when he died. Numrich's defense lawyer objected to everything. The court issued the no-contact orders but didn't require him to post bail.

Significantly, this is the first case in which a Washington State employer has faced felony charges for a workplace fatality. While it's only the first for Washington, it reflects a growing trend across the country to pursue criminal charges in such cases. Prosecutors are beginning to recognize worker fatalities as potential crimes rather than fluke accidents. To learn more about these cases, visit CPR's Crimes Against Workers database.

Showing 2,914 results

Katie Tracy | February 1, 2018

County Prosecutor in Washington State Indicts Construction Company Owner for Trench Collapse Death

On the morning of January 26, 2016, Seattle police were called to a construction site where a worker, Harold Felton, was trapped in a collapsed trench. By the time officers arrived, the rescue operation had turned into a recovery; Felton, 36, had died at the scene.  Felton was working as part of a two-man team […]

James Goodwin | January 31, 2018

Government and Bureaucracy Play Essential, Fundamental Roles in American Life

President Trump’s first State of the Union address contained numerous outrageous claims and statements, rendering a full dissection and critique practically impossible. Many have already singled out one line of the speech as worthy of particular condemnation, so I’ll add mine. Early on, Trump made this statement to the rapturous applause of his conservative allies […]

Matthew Freeman | January 31, 2018

What Creates the Cost, Mr. President?

During the State of the Union address last night, no one was surprised to hear President Trump brag about all the work his administration has done slashing regulatory safeguards for health, safety, the environment, and financial security. It’s clearly one of his proudest first-year accomplishments — making us all less safe and more vulnerable to […]

William Funk | January 30, 2018

Breaking the Law: Many Trump Regulatory Rollbacks and Delays Are Unlawful

Progressives have rightfully taken issue with the Trump administration’s policy goals, from immigration to the environment, from health care to worker safety. Given the president’s decidedly unprogressive stances, one should not be surprised at the policy reversals from the prior administration. One might be surprised, however, and dismayed as well, at the cavalier disregard that […]

James Goodwin | January 29, 2018

The Congressional Review Act: Trump’s First-Year Participation Trophy

Perhaps because he has so few real accomplishments to his name, President Donald Trump has developed a nasty habit of embellishing his record. From the size of the crowd at his inauguration to the number of floors in Trump Tower, he simply won’t let a little thing like “reality” or “facts” or even “cardinal numbers” […]

Matt Shudtz | January 26, 2018

Looking Back on a Year of Trump’s Regulatory ‘Fire and Fury’

Next Tuesday, President Trump will share his view of the state of our union. And if his words correlate with his actions over the last year, the dominant theme will be one of division and disruption. Like no president in recent history, Donald Trump has pushed U.S. residents to cordon ourselves off into dueling tribes […]

Daniel Farber | January 25, 2018

Trump, EPA, and the Anti-Regulatory State

Originally published on The Regulatory Review. Reprinted with permission. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is a central instrument of the modern regulatory state. Whether from the perspective of environmental protection or regulatory economics, 2017 has not been a good year. Experience to date under the Trump Administration is suggestive of industry capture or reflexive […]

Dave Owen | January 22, 2018

Implications of the Supreme Court’s Clean Water Rule/WOTUS Ruling

Originally published on Environmental Law Prof Blog. Today, the United States Supreme Court decided National Association of Manufacturers v. Department of Defense, a case determining whether challenges to the "Clean Water Rule" or "Waters of the United States Rule" should be heard in federal district court or in the United States Court of Appeals for […]

Laurie Ristino | January 17, 2018

Farm Bill 2018: Down Payment on an Effective Conservation Title

This blog post is the first in a forthcoming series on the 2018 Farm Bill. As Congress begins the complex task of crafting the next Farm Bill, much is at stake – from conservation to “food stamps” to rural economies. This blog post is the first in a series addressing important policy considerations with an […]