Time and again in recent years, industry and its allies in Washington have distorted science and pressured scientists. The Bush Administration, for example, repeatedly substituted the ideological views of political appointees for the scientific assessments of agency experts, sometimes suppressing research, sometimes rewriting expert analysis. And just days after taking office, the Trump Administration issued orders to agency leaders that were interpreted as an effort to clamp down on the free flow of information from agency scientists and other experts.
The purpose of these anti-science efforts is almost always the same: to avoid taking needed steps to protect the environment, public health and safety. By suppressing data and scientific findings documenting the extent of climate change, for example, the Bush Administration hoped to forestall meaningful action on the issue, in an effort to protect its industry allies from the inconvenience and expense of changing their polluting ways. Similarly, by suppressing the results of scientific data about the environmental effects of their pesticides, manufacturers hope to avoid the statutory requirements of the nation’s anti-pollution laws.
Read about CPR Member Scholars’ work to rescue science from politics:
Comments on Obama Administration Science Policy. On May 13, 2009, after the White House formally opened the science policy development process up for public comment, CPR Member Scholar Reina Steinzor and Policy Analyst Matthew Shudtz submitted formal comments, expanding on some points in the April 3 letter (see below).
Congressional Testimony. On April 30, 2009, CPR President Rena Steinzor testified before the House Science and Technology Committee’s Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight on clean science and regulatory issues. Read the testimony. Read the news release.
Letter to White House Science Advisor. On April 3, 2009, CPR Member Scholars Rena Steinzor and Wendy Wagner sent a letter to White House Science Advisor John Holdren with several recommendations for protecting science from politics in the Obama Administration. Read the letter. Or read the news release.
Austin American-Statesman and Cleveland Plain Dealer Op-Ed. Read "Rescuing Science from Politics," by CPR Member Scholars Wendy Wagner and Rena Steinzor, in the March 23, 2009 Cleveland Plain Dealer, discussing steps the Obama Administration should take to protect science in the policymaking and regulatory realms from politicization and undue corporate influence. Also published in the Austin American-Statesman, March 23, 2009, "How to Save Science from Politics." Also in the March 30, 2009 Baltimore Sun, "Purifying Science."
CPR White Paper. Read Rena Steinzor and Matthew Shudtz's "Sequestered Science: Secrets Threatening Public Health" (273 kb download), on why government-sanctioned secrecy in science makes for bad policy, bad science, and bad public health. (CPR White Paper 703, April 2007)
Baltimore Sun Op-Ed. Read "Saving Science from Politicians" (329 kb download), an op-ed by Wendy Wagner and Rena Steinzor, published September 5, 2006 in the Baltimore Sun.
Rescuing Science: The Book. In August 2006, Cambridge University Press published Rescuing Science from Politics: Regulation and the Distortion of Scientific Research, edited by Wendy Wagner and Rena Steinzor, featuring chapter contributions from a number of CPR Member Scholars and others. The book is available from Cambridge University Press and Amazon.com. Or read a summary of the policy solutions offered in Rescuing Science from Politics: Regulation and the Distortion of Scientific Research, edited by Wendy Wagner and Rena Steinzor, featuring chapter contributions from CPR Scholars and others. (CPR White Paper 604, August 2006).