Clean Water Enforcement: Sharp Eyes Reveal Dull Tools

by Yee Huang

January 02, 2009

Chairmen Henry Waxman and James Oberstar have been busy sharpening water protection tools on the Congressional whetstone. In a memorandum to President-elect Obama, Waxman, chair of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, and Oberstar, chair of the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, detail serious deterioration of Clean Water Act (CWA) enforcement. The investigation found nearly 500 enforcement cases, brought to protect the nation’s waters, that have been negatively affected as a result of a divided 2006 Supreme Court ruling and subsequent Bush administration guidance. The memo is here.

Among key findings, the memo concluded that:

  • The Supreme Court’s 2006 decision in Rapanos v. United States and resulting EPA guidance for regional EPA offices to implement the decision have caused a decline in enforcing hundreds of CWA violations, contrary to sworn statements made by Bush Administration officials that the effects on CWA were “slight, not significant”;
  • The decline in enforcement cases includes 300 cases in which the EPA consciously decided to not pursue violations, 26 cases in which the civil penalty was reduced, and 80 cases that were significantly delayed; and
  • Because of the difficulties in implementing the Rapanos decision and subsequent guidance, fewer financial and staff resources are available to pursue new enforcement actions that prevent water pollution.

The Supreme Court’s 2006 plurality decision in Rapanos focused on which wetlands were covered by the CWA. With no clear majority opinion, most federal courts have adopted the jurisdictional test in Justice Anthony Kennedy’s opinion. This test requires a “significant nexus” between navigable waters and wetlands. Where this nexus or connection exists, the wetlands fall under the jurisdiction of the CWA. However, this test largely ignores science of hydrology and has been disastrously difficult to apply.

 

Following the Court’s decision, the EPA and the Army Corps of Engineers proposed initial guidelines that would have created broad protection for wetlands by making development activities subject to stricter permit requirements. However, developers’ associations and the agriculture industry protested, taking their complaints to the White House. After review by the White House, the final guidance issued in June 2007 ultimately chose a narrow interpretation of the Supreme Court opinion that diminishes protection for wetlands. This guidance requires a time- and resource-intensive approach to determine the status of a wetland. As a result, the guidance diminishes protection for wetlands by narrowing the coverage of the CWA and further straining limited resources by mandating a case-by-case determination of wetland status.

 

The investigation reinforces problems identified by CPR Member Scholar Bill Andreen and Policy Analyst Shana Jones in Clean Water Act: A Blueprint for Reform. The Blueprint notes that, despite a robust toolset of administrative, civil, and criminal penalties, “even the strongest tools are rendered ineffective by disuse.” In addition to the deterioration of CWA enforcement, the Blueprint identified enforcement obstacles such as heavy evidentiary burdens in citizen suits and immunity from civil penalties for federal facilities.

 

Environmental and water advocacy groups welcomed the results of the investigation. Ed Hopkins, Director of the Sierra Club's Environmental Quality Program, said:

The findings released today by Chairmen Waxman and Oberstar are dramatic proof that Congress should pass the Clean Water Restoration Act to re-establish the Clean Water Act's longstanding protections. We urge Congress to act early next year.

Ever since the Rapanos decision, CWA enforcement tools have been cast aside, growing dull with disuse. Now it is a relief to hear the buzz of the congressional whetstone cranking up, ready again to sharpen the tools most needed to protect the nation’s waters.
 

Excellent point! It is has been so frustrating watching this weakening of the EPA's commitment to protecting our nation's waterways. Short term gain has been so infuriatingly placed in front of long term stability in water management. I hope that more resources will be allocated to appropriately managing our water resources in the next 4 years.
— Matt Mino
We ask for your email address so that we may follow up with you, ask you to clarify your comment in some way, or perhaps alert you to someone else's response. Only the name you supply and your comment will be displayed on the site to the public. Our blog is a forum for the exchange of ideas, and we hope to foster intelligent, interesting and respectful discussion. We do not apply an ideological screen, however, we reserve the right to remove blog posts we deem inappropriate for any reason, but particularly for language that we deem to be in the nature of a personal attack or otherwise offensive. If we remove a comment you've posted, and you want to know why, ask us (info@progressivereform.org) and we will tell you. If you see a post you regard as offensive, please let us know.

Also from Yee Huang

Short Bio needs to be uploaded.

The Center for Progressive Reform

455 Massachusetts Ave., NW, #150-513
Washington, DC 20001
info@progressivereform.org
202.747.0698

© Center for Progressive Reform, 2015