Drywall News Update

by Ben Somberg

September 04, 2009

The AP reports:

A federal judge presiding over hundreds of lawsuits against Chinese drywall makers and installers said Thursday that he plans to hold the first trial in January for the cases, which claim the imported products emit sulfur, methane and other chemical compounds that have ruined homes and harmed residents' health.

U.S. District Judge Eldon Fallon told attorneys that he expects them to pick six plaintiffs whose cases could be tried in early 2010, with the first trial starting in January.

The Consumer Product Safety Commission, in its August drywall update, reported that new complaints continue to come in, and "the
majority of the reports continue to be from Florida, Louisiana, and Virginia." And:

To date, CPSC staff has confirmed 6,211,200 sheets of Chinese drywall were imported into the U.S., plus 28,778 sheets imported into Guam, Saipan, and American Samoa during 2006. The staff is continuing to verify more shipments.

Oh, and the whole notion that it's as simple as phosphogypsum? Not so fast, a group of federal and state scientists suggest. Here's what those scientists (from CPSC, EPA, CDC, as well as the health departments of Florida, Louisiana, and Virginia) said in an August memo after testing 21 drywall samples, from foreign and domestic sources, including from houses with pipes that had become corroded:

Based on the data from the two laboratories, the Technical Team concludes that there is no phosphogypsum contamination in the drywall samples tested. In particular, the levels of 226Ra found in these samples were generally more than a factor of 10 lower than those found in phosphogypsum (10 to 35 pCi/g), but comparable to levels found in other commonly used building materials including bricks and concrete.

...

The conclusions that can be reached are that there is no indication that these drywall samples contain phosphogypsum, there is no indication that imported drywall contains any more radioactive material than domestic sources, and drywall associated with these samples would not represent a significant source of radiation exposure.

But: "Results of these 21 drywall samples may not be representative of all domestic or all imported drywall."

 

Tagged as: drywall
Be the first to comment on this entry.
We ask for your email address so that we may follow up with you, ask you to clarify your comment in some way, or perhaps alert you to someone else's response. Only the name you supply and your comment will be displayed on the site to the public. Our blog is a forum for the exchange of ideas, and we hope to foster intelligent, interesting and respectful discussion. We do not apply an ideological screen, however, we reserve the right to remove blog posts we deem inappropriate for any reason, but particularly for language that we deem to be in the nature of a personal attack or otherwise offensive. If we remove a comment you've posted, and you want to know why, ask us (info@progressivereform.org) and we will tell you. If you see a post you regard as offensive, please let us know.

Also from Ben Somberg

Short Bio needs to be uploaded.

Simpler Government, or Secret and Unaccountable Government?

Somberg | Apr 04, 2013 | Regulatory Policy

Who Will Run the EPA?

Somberg | Apr 01, 2013 | Regulatory Policy

Mancini "Leads" OIRA as Deputy Administrator

Somberg | Mar 13, 2013 | Regulatory Policy

There is Now No OIRA Administrator

Somberg | Mar 11, 2013 | Regulatory Policy

Robert Glicksman Testifies in House Hearing on Regulatory Policy

Somberg | Feb 28, 2013 | Regulatory Policy

The Center for Progressive Reform

455 Massachusetts Ave., NW, #150-513
Washington, DC 20001
info@progressivereform.org
202.747.0698

© Center for Progressive Reform, 2015