What’s for Thanksgiving? Hopefully not more crippling pain for poultry workers! Learn more at upcoming webinar

by Rena Steinzor

November 20, 2013

When we all sit down for Thanksgiving dinner next week, we hope that the food we are feeding our families is wholesome and that the workers who produce it are safe.  Thanks to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), ever the mindless booster of corporate profits, that turkey at the center of the table already disappoints both expectations, and if USDA has its way, matters are about to get much worse.  Hiding behind disingenuous promises to “modernize” the food safety system, USDA has decided to pull federal food inspectors off the line at poultry processing plants across the nation.  No new preventative measures to ensure that poultry is free of salmonella would happen.  And already crowded, bloody, stinking lines would speed up dramatically—to as many as 175 birds per minute, or three birds/second. Workers who suffer grave ergonomic injuries from the repetitive motions of hanging, cutting, and packing the birds would endure conditions that are two or three times worse than the status quo 

The consequences of USDA’s de-regulatory scheme are well documented. Back in 2001, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) found significant food safety concerns in pilot plants authorized to test the new system and just this past summer slammed the USDA’s data in justifying the program. The Agency is using data cherry-picked from two-year snapshots over a 15-year period of the piloted system to justify the program and relying on old and inaccurate economic analysis.  

Groups like Food and Water Watch have amassed evidence of the puss and bile filled carcasses that result from the un-inspected poultry and the European Union has rejected imports from Australia, which uses the same weak approach to inspections. 

To make matters worse, the USDA program, called “HIMP,” would allow chlorine “baths” to substitute for human quality control for the poultry as it makes its way through the evisceration process. Kimberly Kindy of the Washington Post has documented the devastating health effects these chemicals have on inspectors and plant workers alike. 

The Southern Poverty Law Center has reported on the impacts punishing evisceration line speeds already have on the bodies of poultry workers. In a report put out earlier this year they found:

Nearly three-quarters of the poultry workers interviewed…described suffering some type of significant work-related injury or illness. In spite of many factors that lead to undercounting of injuries in poultry plants, the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) reported an injury rate of 5.9 percent for poultry processing workers in 2010, a rate that is more than 50 percent higher than the 3.8 percent injury rate for all U.S. workers. 

When the USDA proposal first came out, White House staff at the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) cleared it very quickly without checking with occupational disease experts at OSHA. Instead,  former OIRA head Cass Sunstein trotted out the $250 million saving to struggling corporations like Tysons, Perdue and Holly Farms.  That money will be taken out of the health of poultry workers.

It’s way past time that USDA  put the safety and security of workers and consumers ahead of Big Chicken.

Our friends at the Southern Poverty Law Center are hosting a webinar at 1:00 p.m. tomorrow (Thursday, November 21) on the problems with HIMP.

Tune in and hear from workers, inspectors and experts in the industry alike about what’s at stake this Thanksgiving. Details: here.


Be the first to comment on this entry.
We ask for your email address so that we may follow up with you, ask you to clarify your comment in some way, or perhaps alert you to someone else's response. Only the name you supply and your comment will be displayed on the site to the public. Our blog is a forum for the exchange of ideas, and we hope to foster intelligent, interesting and respectful discussion. We do not apply an ideological screen, however, we reserve the right to remove blog posts we deem inappropriate for any reason, but particularly for language that we deem to be in the nature of a personal attack or otherwise offensive. If we remove a comment you've posted, and you want to know why, ask us (info@progressivereform.org) and we will tell you. If you see a post you regard as offensive, please let us know.

Also from Rena Steinzor

Rena Steinzor is a Professor of Law at the University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law, and a past president of the Center for Progressive Reform. She is the author of Why Not Jail? Industrial Catastrophes, Corporate Malfeasance, and Government Inaction.

The Major Rules Doctrine -- A 'Judge-Empowering Proposition'

Steinzor | Oct 11, 2018 | Regulatory Policy

The Hill Op-Ed: Brett Kavanaugh's Opportunistic Corner Cutting

Steinzor | Aug 30, 2018 | Regulatory Policy

The Guidance Racket

Steinzor | Mar 27, 2018 | Regulatory Policy

The Center for Progressive Reform

2021 L St NW, #101-330
Washington, DC. 20036

© Center for Progressive Reform, 2015