Law Schools Doing Good

by Daniel Farber

November 04, 2015

How Law Schools Serve the Public

Most people probably think of law schools, when they think of them at all, as places that train future lawyers.  That’s true, and it’s important, but law schools do a lot more.  Faculty scholarship makes a difference — law review articles laid the foundation for many of the ideas now guiding judges (both on the Right and the Left).  But I’d like to focus here on another, more recent activity by law schools — the environmental law clinics and research centers that have sprung up in recent years. There are too many of these across the country to describe here.  Instead, I’ll stick to the University of California law schools. Even so, space allows a discussion of only a fraction of their activities.

One key activity is a joint project of Berkeley and UCLA, although it’s housed here.  The announced goal of the Climate Change and Business Initiative helping businesses prosper in an era of climate change.  In a series of projects, the Initiative has worked with stakeholders to find legal barriers that stand in the way of renewable energy, energy conservation, and other sustainability practices.  Working actively with California state government, the Initiative has issued a series of white papers advising how these barriers can be removed.  The Bank of America Foundation funds this project. Berkeley is also actively engaged in water-related issues, particularly groundwater.  One major effort resulted in a white paper on fracking and groundwater that helped shape California law on the subject. We are also undertaking several projects to address issues raised by the on-going California drought.  By the way, none of our efforts are funded by state money or student tuition.

UCLA is also active on several other fronts.  For instance, a recent report provides recommendations for California’s new database of adaptation efforts by coastal communities, in order to make the database a more effective tool for cities and counties on the coast.  Another important effort is a study of state public utility commissions to determine what factors lead to innovative energy policies. Students at the environmental law clinic helped draft new legislation to govern the Los Angeles river.  And of course, as noted above, UCLA and Berkeley are partners in the Climate Change and Business Initiative.

At the newest of the UC law schools, the Irvine environmental law clinic is already very active.  Among other activities, it has:

  • Investigated non-compliance with federal and state environmental laws to abate pollution;
  • Conferred with tribal leaders concerning threats to local tribal lands and resources; and
  • Provided training to non-profit organizations and individuals regarding state and federal environmental laws.

Meanwhile, at UC Davis, the environmental law center provides training on key environmental issues for attorneys, judges and legislators. It also convenes public policymakers to discuss and debate cutting-edge environmental issues and has ongoing partnerships with such organizations as the California League of Cities, the Environmental Law Institute and the Conference of Western Attorneys General. The Center’s environmental research and policy priorities include climate change law and policy; water allocation in the American West; property rights; environmental governance questions; renewable energy; and green technology.

Finally, there’s Hastings, which is autonomous from the rest of the UC system.  It has several clinical-style offerings that touch on environmental law.  The economic development clinic focuses on urban land use issues, often involving CEQA, and many students participate in environmental externships.

While I’m especially a fan of what we’re doing at the UC Schools, these programs are not unique.  There are dozens of clinics and research centers at law schools across the country, all hard at work trying to address pressing environmental issues.  And of course environmental law isn’t the only area of activity.  Law schools are addressing a whole range of issues from criminal justice to Internet privacy. It’s too bad that this important work doesn’t get the public attention it deserves.

This blog is cross-posted on Legal Planet.


Tagged as: legal education
Be the first to comment on this entry.
We ask for your email address so that we may follow up with you, ask you to clarify your comment in some way, or perhaps alert you to someone else's response. Only the name you supply and your comment will be displayed on the site to the public. Our blog is a forum for the exchange of ideas, and we hope to foster intelligent, interesting and respectful discussion. We do not apply an ideological screen, however, we reserve the right to remove blog posts we deem inappropriate for any reason, but particularly for language that we deem to be in the nature of a personal attack or otherwise offensive. If we remove a comment you've posted, and you want to know why, ask us ( and we will tell you. If you see a post you regard as offensive, please let us know.

Also from Daniel Farber

Daniel A. Farber is the Sho Sato Professor of Law and Director of the California Center for Law, Energy and the Environment at the University of California, Berkeley.

What Else Should Congress Investigate?

Farber | Apr 12, 2019 | Regulatory Policy

Economists vs. Environmentalists: Time for D├ętente?

Farber | Apr 09, 2019 | Regulatory Policy

Shackling EPA Risk Assessment

Farber | Apr 01, 2019 | Environmental Policy

Trump on the Environment: A Study in Falsehood

Farber | Mar 29, 2019 | Environmental Policy
Recommended Resources:
Climate Change
Time for Real Action on Global Warming

The Center for Progressive Reform

2021 L St NW, #101-330
Washington, DC. 20036

© Center for Progressive Reform, 2015