Defeating the Public Interest One Bill at a Time: The ALERT Act (H.R. 1759)

by James Goodwin

April 14, 2015

Background:  Tomorrow, the full House Judiciary Committee will be holding a markup of the H.R. 1759, the All Economic Regulations are Transparent Act of 2015 (ALERT Act), sponsored by Rep. John Ratcliffe (R-Tex.).  The House of Representatives considered a similar bill during its last session.  (The hearing is also noteworthy, because the committee will be marking up H.R. 427, the Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act of 2015, or REINS Act.  For more information on the REINS Act, see here.)

What the ALERT Act does:  The bill would impose a series of new burdensome reporting requirements on agencies and the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) regarding the progress and impacts of the agencies’ pending rulemakings.  Once a month, agencies would have to provide detailed information about any rules that they are working on, while OIRA would have to issue an annual report detailing the cumulative costs of all rules that have been proposed or finalized during the previous 12 months.  Agencies also would be blocked from implementing their final rules for at least six months until after they have published certain information about the rules on the internet.

Why the ALERT Act is bad for the public interest:

  • The requirements that the bill imposes on agencies would be time-consuming and costly to carry out, wasting scarce agency resources and preventing agencies from carrying out their statutory missions in a timely fashion.

  • The bill would create less transparency about regulations, by inundating the public with reams of unhelpful data regarding pending regulations and their impacts.  Only the most economically powerful could meaningful sift through these data, putting the public and small businesses at a disadvantage.

  • Because the bill only presents information about regulatory costs—and no information about regulatory benefits—the effect of the bill’s reporting is to mislead the public about the value of pending agency rulemakings.   This biased presentation ensures that all regulations—no matter how beneficial to society on balance—appear to be a huge drain on society.

  • The bill would unnecessarily add a default six-month delay to all agency rulemakings.  The rulemaking process already moves too slow, resulting in needless harm to people, the environment, and the economy.

  • This bill would do nothing to address the biggest transparency problem in the regulatory system:  OIRA’s centralized review of regulations.

A detailed analysis on the ALERT Act is available here.

For detailed analyses of legislative attacks against the U.S. regulatory system, see here.

Be the first to comment on this entry.
We ask for your email address so that we may follow up with you, ask you to clarify your comment in some way, or perhaps alert you to someone else's response. Only the name you supply and your comment will be displayed on the site to the public. Our blog is a forum for the exchange of ideas, and we hope to foster intelligent, interesting and respectful discussion. We do not apply an ideological screen, however, we reserve the right to remove blog posts we deem inappropriate for any reason, but particularly for language that we deem to be in the nature of a personal attack or otherwise offensive. If we remove a comment you've posted, and you want to know why, ask us ( and we will tell you. If you see a post you regard as offensive, please let us know.

Also from James Goodwin

James Goodwin, J.D., M.P.P., is a Senior Policy Analyst with the Center for Progressive Reform. He joined CPR in May of 2008.

The Center for Progressive Reform

455 Massachusetts Ave., NW, #150-513
Washington, DC 20001

© Center for Progressive Reform, 2015