Mountaintop Removal Review Moves to Next Stage

by Holly Doremus

October 02, 2009

(Cross-posted by permission from LegalPlanet)

EPA finished September with a flourish. In addition to proposing New Source Review rules for greenhouse gas emissions and pushing for TSCA reform, the agency took the next step toward a crack-down on mountaintop removal. On September 11, EPA announced preliminary plans to review all 79 pending permit applications. This week, after considering public comment, it finalized that list, concluding that indeed all 79 require further review, based on concerns that the projects could more fully avoid or minimize impacts on aquatic resources; that they threaten to violate water quality standards; that their cumulative impacts have not been fully assessed; and that proposed mitigation efforts may not be effective.

Under the coordinated review procedures announced by EPA and the Corps in June, the next step is for the issuing Corps district and the appropriate regional office of EPA to review the permit applications together. That review is supposed to take no more than 60 days for any individual application, but does not have to being right away — the Corps will let EPA know when it is ready to deal with each permit application, based on workload, availability of information, and other factors.

The individual permit review process will give EPA a chance to fully air its concerns, and the Corps a chance to revise the permit conditions or even decline to issue the permit. The acid test will come at its conclusion. The Corps may still decide to issue a permit over EPA objections, but must provide a written explanation of its response to EPA’s concerns. At that point, EPA can either back off or exercise its § 404 veto power.

That EPA has decided to pursue further review of all 79 permit applications suggests that the agency is serious about fulfilling its statutory role of overseeing the Corps’ permitting decisions to make sure the nation’s waters are adequately protected. And it may soon have some added scientific tools for doing that job — Ken Ward’s Coal Tattoo blog reports that EPA’s National Center for Environmental Assessment is preparing a review of existing studies on the ecological impacts of mountaintop removal. A draft of the report is expected to be made public by the middle of November.

 

Be the first to comment on this entry.
We ask for your email address so that we may follow up with you, ask you to clarify your comment in some way, or perhaps alert you to someone else's response. Only the name you supply and your comment will be displayed on the site to the public. Our blog is a forum for the exchange of ideas, and we hope to foster intelligent, interesting and respectful discussion. We do not apply an ideological screen, however, we reserve the right to remove blog posts we deem inappropriate for any reason, but particularly for language that we deem to be in the nature of a personal attack or otherwise offensive. If we remove a comment you've posted, and you want to know why, ask us (info@progressivereform.org) and we will tell you. If you see a post you regard as offensive, please let us know.

Also from Holly Doremus

Holly Doremus is James H. House and Hiram H. Hurd Professor of Environmental Regulation; Faculty Co-Director, Center for Law, Energy & the Environment; and Director, Environmental Law Program at the University of California, Berkeley.

Mass. v. EPA bears fruit for environmental petitioners

Doremus | Oct 23, 2013 | Environmental Policy

What’s holding up the Clean Water Act jurisdictional guidance?

Doremus | May 20, 2013 | Environmental Policy

Jane Lubchenco's Legacy at NOAA

Doremus | Dec 14, 2012 | Good Government

What to Expect in the Logging Roads Case

Doremus | Nov 30, 2012 | Environmental Policy

Should We Revive an Extinct Galapagos Tortoise?

Doremus | Nov 29, 2012 | Environmental Policy

The Center for Progressive Reform

455 Massachusetts Ave., NW, #150-513
Washington, DC 20001
info@progressivereform.org
202.747.0698

© Center for Progressive Reform, 2015